拥有四大经验的审计合伙人的市场溢价

A. Zimmerman, Kenneth L. Bills, Monika Causholli
{"title":"拥有四大经验的审计合伙人的市场溢价","authors":"A. Zimmerman, Kenneth L. Bills, Monika Causholli","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3084770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study investigates how non-Big 4 firm audit partners' Big 4 experience is valued by the audit market. The Big 4 audit firms have differentiated themselves as nationally recognized firms for whose services companies are willing to pay a premium. It is unclear, however, whether this reputation follows individual auditors when they move to a non-Big 4 audit firm. We find that audit fees are higher for non-Big 4 audit partners with Big 4 experience with the fee premium ranging from 17 to 26 percent depending on the extent of experience when they are employed by small audit firms but find no evidence of a fee premium for Big 4 experience at the second-tier audit firms. Furthermore, in additional analyses, we do not find strong, consistent evidence that audit quality is higher for clients of non-Big 4 audit partners with Big 4 experience than their counterparts without Big 4 experience.\n Data Availability: Data were obtained from publicly available sources identified in the paper.\n JEL Classifications: M42.","PeriodicalId":12319,"journal":{"name":"Financial Accounting eJournal","volume":"261 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Market Premium for Audit Partners with Big 4 Experience\",\"authors\":\"A. Zimmerman, Kenneth L. Bills, Monika Causholli\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3084770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study investigates how non-Big 4 firm audit partners' Big 4 experience is valued by the audit market. The Big 4 audit firms have differentiated themselves as nationally recognized firms for whose services companies are willing to pay a premium. It is unclear, however, whether this reputation follows individual auditors when they move to a non-Big 4 audit firm. We find that audit fees are higher for non-Big 4 audit partners with Big 4 experience with the fee premium ranging from 17 to 26 percent depending on the extent of experience when they are employed by small audit firms but find no evidence of a fee premium for Big 4 experience at the second-tier audit firms. Furthermore, in additional analyses, we do not find strong, consistent evidence that audit quality is higher for clients of non-Big 4 audit partners with Big 4 experience than their counterparts without Big 4 experience.\\n Data Availability: Data were obtained from publicly available sources identified in the paper.\\n JEL Classifications: M42.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Financial Accounting eJournal\",\"volume\":\"261 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Financial Accounting eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3084770\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Accounting eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3084770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

本研究探讨了审计市场如何评价非四大会计师事务所审计合伙人的四大经验。四大会计师事务所已经将自己区分为全国公认的事务所,其服务公司愿意为其支付溢价。然而,目前尚不清楚的是,当个别审计师跳槽到非四大会计师事务所时,这种声誉是否也会随之而来。我们发现,拥有“四大”经验的非“四大”审计合伙人的审计费用更高,其费用溢价从17%到26%不等,具体取决于他们受雇于小型审计事务所时的经验程度,但没有证据表明,拥有“四大”经验的合伙人在二线审计事务所会有费用溢价。此外,在其他分析中,我们没有发现强有力的、一致的证据表明,具有四大经验的非四大审计合伙人的客户比没有四大经验的同行的审计质量更高。数据可用性:数据来自论文中确定的公开来源。JEL分类:M42。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Market Premium for Audit Partners with Big 4 Experience
This study investigates how non-Big 4 firm audit partners' Big 4 experience is valued by the audit market. The Big 4 audit firms have differentiated themselves as nationally recognized firms for whose services companies are willing to pay a premium. It is unclear, however, whether this reputation follows individual auditors when they move to a non-Big 4 audit firm. We find that audit fees are higher for non-Big 4 audit partners with Big 4 experience with the fee premium ranging from 17 to 26 percent depending on the extent of experience when they are employed by small audit firms but find no evidence of a fee premium for Big 4 experience at the second-tier audit firms. Furthermore, in additional analyses, we do not find strong, consistent evidence that audit quality is higher for clients of non-Big 4 audit partners with Big 4 experience than their counterparts without Big 4 experience. Data Availability: Data were obtained from publicly available sources identified in the paper. JEL Classifications: M42.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信