在工业检测的单类机器学习模型中寻找人类干预的最佳决策边界

IF 0.8 4区 工程技术 Q4 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
Timo Zander, Ziyan Pan, Pascal Birnstill, J. Beyerer
{"title":"在工业检测的单类机器学习模型中寻找人类干预的最佳决策边界","authors":"Timo Zander, Ziyan Pan, Pascal Birnstill, J. Beyerer","doi":"10.1515/teme-2023-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Anomaly detection with machine learning in industrial inspection systems for manufactured products relies on labelled data. This raises the question of how the labelling by humans should be conducted. Moreover, such a system will most likely always be imperfect and potentially need a human fall-back mechanism for ambiguous cases. We consider the case where we want to optimise the cost of the combined inspection process done by humans together with a pre-trained algorithm. This gives improved combined performance and increases the knowledge of the performance of the pre-trained model. We focus on so-called one-class classification problems which produce a continuous outlier score. After establishing some initial setup mechanisms ranging from using prior knowledge to calibrated models, we then define some cost model for machine inspection with a possible second inspection of the sample done by a human. Further, we discuss in this cost model how to select two optimal boundaries of the outlier score, where in between these two boundaries human inspection takes place. Finally, we frame this established knowledge into an applicable algorithm and conduct some experiments for the validity of the model.","PeriodicalId":56086,"journal":{"name":"Tm-Technisches Messen","volume":"2 1","pages":"478 - 488"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finding optimal decision boundaries for human intervention in one-class machine-learning models for industrial inspection\",\"authors\":\"Timo Zander, Ziyan Pan, Pascal Birnstill, J. Beyerer\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/teme-2023-0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Anomaly detection with machine learning in industrial inspection systems for manufactured products relies on labelled data. This raises the question of how the labelling by humans should be conducted. Moreover, such a system will most likely always be imperfect and potentially need a human fall-back mechanism for ambiguous cases. We consider the case where we want to optimise the cost of the combined inspection process done by humans together with a pre-trained algorithm. This gives improved combined performance and increases the knowledge of the performance of the pre-trained model. We focus on so-called one-class classification problems which produce a continuous outlier score. After establishing some initial setup mechanisms ranging from using prior knowledge to calibrated models, we then define some cost model for machine inspection with a possible second inspection of the sample done by a human. Further, we discuss in this cost model how to select two optimal boundaries of the outlier score, where in between these two boundaries human inspection takes place. Finally, we frame this established knowledge into an applicable algorithm and conduct some experiments for the validity of the model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tm-Technisches Messen\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"478 - 488\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tm-Technisches Messen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/teme-2023-0010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tm-Technisches Messen","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/teme-2023-0010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要工业产品检测系统中的机器学习异常检测依赖于标记数据。这就提出了人类应该如何进行标签的问题。此外,这样的系统很可能总是不完美的,并且可能需要一个人为的后备机制来处理模棱两可的情况。我们考虑这样一种情况,我们想要优化由人类和预训练算法一起完成的组合检查过程的成本。这提高了综合性能,并增加了预训练模型的性能知识。我们专注于所谓的一类分类问题,它产生一个连续的异常值得分。在建立了从使用先验知识到校准模型的一些初始设置机制之后,我们然后定义了一些用于机器检查的成本模型,并可能由人类完成对样品的第二次检查。此外,我们在这个成本模型中讨论了如何选择离群值的两个最优边界,在这两个边界之间进行人工检查。最后,我们将这些已建立的知识框架化为一种适用的算法,并对模型的有效性进行了实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Finding optimal decision boundaries for human intervention in one-class machine-learning models for industrial inspection
Abstract Anomaly detection with machine learning in industrial inspection systems for manufactured products relies on labelled data. This raises the question of how the labelling by humans should be conducted. Moreover, such a system will most likely always be imperfect and potentially need a human fall-back mechanism for ambiguous cases. We consider the case where we want to optimise the cost of the combined inspection process done by humans together with a pre-trained algorithm. This gives improved combined performance and increases the knowledge of the performance of the pre-trained model. We focus on so-called one-class classification problems which produce a continuous outlier score. After establishing some initial setup mechanisms ranging from using prior knowledge to calibrated models, we then define some cost model for machine inspection with a possible second inspection of the sample done by a human. Further, we discuss in this cost model how to select two optimal boundaries of the outlier score, where in between these two boundaries human inspection takes place. Finally, we frame this established knowledge into an applicable algorithm and conduct some experiments for the validity of the model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tm-Technisches Messen
Tm-Technisches Messen 工程技术-仪器仪表
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal promotes dialogue between the developers of application-oriented sensors, measurement systems, and measurement methods and the manufacturers and measurement technologists who use them. Topics The manufacture and characteristics of new sensors for measurement technology in the industrial sector New measurement methods Hardware and software based processing and analysis of measurement signals to obtain measurement values The outcomes of employing new measurement systems and methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信