双字算法的形式化及对“双字算法基本构件的严格与严格误差界”的评析

J. Muller, L. Rideau
{"title":"双字算法的形式化及对“双字算法基本构件的严格与严格误差界”的评析","authors":"J. Muller, L. Rideau","doi":"10.1145/3484514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, a complete set of algorithms for manipulating double-word numbers (some classical, some new) was analyzed [16]. We have formally proven all the theorems given in that article, using the Coq proof assistant. The formal proof work led us to: (i) locate mistakes in some of the original paper proofs (mistakes that, however, do not hinder the validity of the algorithms), (ii) significantly improve some error bounds, and (iii) generalize some results by showing that they are still valid if we slightly change the rounding mode. The consequence is that the algorithms presented in [16] can be used with high confidence, and that some of them are even more accurate than what was believed before. This illustrates what formal proof can bring to computer arithmetic: beyond mere (yet extremely useful) verification, correction, and consolidation of already known results, it can help to find new properties. All our formal proofs are freely available.","PeriodicalId":7036,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS)","volume":"258 1","pages":"1 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formalization of Double-Word Arithmetic, and Comments on “Tight and Rigorous Error Bounds for Basic Building Blocks of Double-Word Arithmetic”\",\"authors\":\"J. Muller, L. Rideau\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3484514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently, a complete set of algorithms for manipulating double-word numbers (some classical, some new) was analyzed [16]. We have formally proven all the theorems given in that article, using the Coq proof assistant. The formal proof work led us to: (i) locate mistakes in some of the original paper proofs (mistakes that, however, do not hinder the validity of the algorithms), (ii) significantly improve some error bounds, and (iii) generalize some results by showing that they are still valid if we slightly change the rounding mode. The consequence is that the algorithms presented in [16] can be used with high confidence, and that some of them are even more accurate than what was believed before. This illustrates what formal proof can bring to computer arithmetic: beyond mere (yet extremely useful) verification, correction, and consolidation of already known results, it can help to find new properties. All our formal proofs are freely available.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS)\",\"volume\":\"258 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3484514\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3484514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

最近,对一套完整的处理双字数的算法(有些是经典的,有些是新的)进行了分析。我们已经使用Coq证明助手正式证明了那篇文章中给出的所有定理。正式证明工作使我们:(i)找到了一些原始纸质证明中的错误(然而,这些错误并不妨碍算法的有效性),(ii)显着改善了一些错误界限,(iii)通过表明如果我们稍微改变舍入模式,它们仍然有效来推广一些结果。结果是[16]中提出的算法可以高置信度地使用,其中一些算法甚至比以前认为的更准确。这说明了形式证明可以给计算机算法带来什么:除了对已知结果的简单(但非常有用的)验证、纠正和巩固之外,它还可以帮助发现新的性质。我们所有的正式证明都是免费提供的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Formalization of Double-Word Arithmetic, and Comments on “Tight and Rigorous Error Bounds for Basic Building Blocks of Double-Word Arithmetic”
Recently, a complete set of algorithms for manipulating double-word numbers (some classical, some new) was analyzed [16]. We have formally proven all the theorems given in that article, using the Coq proof assistant. The formal proof work led us to: (i) locate mistakes in some of the original paper proofs (mistakes that, however, do not hinder the validity of the algorithms), (ii) significantly improve some error bounds, and (iii) generalize some results by showing that they are still valid if we slightly change the rounding mode. The consequence is that the algorithms presented in [16] can be used with high confidence, and that some of them are even more accurate than what was believed before. This illustrates what formal proof can bring to computer arithmetic: beyond mere (yet extremely useful) verification, correction, and consolidation of already known results, it can help to find new properties. All our formal proofs are freely available.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信