两种低剂量强力霉素治疗慢性牙周炎的临床疗效评价

A. Lafzi, R. Amid
{"title":"两种低剂量强力霉素治疗慢性牙周炎的临床疗效评价","authors":"A. Lafzi, R. Amid","doi":"10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.43611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statement of Problems: Incomplete therapy of periodontal diseases treated with scalling and root planning (SRP) has been resulted in improvement of host- modulated therapy (HMT) as a new method. Purpuse: Introducing an adjunctive therapy in addition to SRP in managing of destructive preiodontal therapy was the main purpose of this study. Materials and Method: Fifteen patients suffered from chronic periodontitis were randomly assigned to test and control groups. Treatment consisted of: SRP+ placebo (control group), SRP+ low dose doxycycline (LDD) twice daily for six months (continous LDD), and SRP+LDD twice daily for first and third two months after completion of phase I (cyclic LDD). Gingival indices including: probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), modified gingival index (MGI), and O’leary plaque index were measured and recorded at baseline and at one and six months after the completion of therapy. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: Probing depth reduction in both of LDD groups were significantly greater than control group (p<0.01). However, this reduction happened between baseline and follow-up oppointments. In other word, the differences between the 1-and 6-month evaluation were not significant (p=0.25). Continous LDD regimen showed an additional PD reduction (from 5.40 to 2.06mm) for pockets greater than 5mm in comparison to the other groups. Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, the results showed that adjunctive continous and cyclic regimen of low-dose doxycycline can improve the clinical efficacy of conventional therapy, even in patients with less than favorable plaque control. Key words: Chronic periodontitis, Antibiotic, Doxycycline, Adjunctive therapy.","PeriodicalId":15562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences","volume":"53 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVALUATION OF CLINICAL EFFICACY OF TWO LOW-DOSE DOXYCYCLINE REGIMEN IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC PERIODONTITIS\",\"authors\":\"A. Lafzi, R. Amid\",\"doi\":\"10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.43611\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Statement of Problems: Incomplete therapy of periodontal diseases treated with scalling and root planning (SRP) has been resulted in improvement of host- modulated therapy (HMT) as a new method. Purpuse: Introducing an adjunctive therapy in addition to SRP in managing of destructive preiodontal therapy was the main purpose of this study. Materials and Method: Fifteen patients suffered from chronic periodontitis were randomly assigned to test and control groups. Treatment consisted of: SRP+ placebo (control group), SRP+ low dose doxycycline (LDD) twice daily for six months (continous LDD), and SRP+LDD twice daily for first and third two months after completion of phase I (cyclic LDD). Gingival indices including: probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), modified gingival index (MGI), and O’leary plaque index were measured and recorded at baseline and at one and six months after the completion of therapy. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: Probing depth reduction in both of LDD groups were significantly greater than control group (p<0.01). However, this reduction happened between baseline and follow-up oppointments. In other word, the differences between the 1-and 6-month evaluation were not significant (p=0.25). Continous LDD regimen showed an additional PD reduction (from 5.40 to 2.06mm) for pockets greater than 5mm in comparison to the other groups. Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, the results showed that adjunctive continous and cyclic regimen of low-dose doxycycline can improve the clinical efficacy of conventional therapy, even in patients with less than favorable plaque control. Key words: Chronic periodontitis, Antibiotic, Doxycycline, Adjunctive therapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.43611\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.43611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题的陈述:牙周病的不完全治疗,导致了宿主调节治疗(HMT)作为一种新方法的改进。目的:本研究的主要目的是介绍一种除SRP外的辅助治疗方法来管理破坏性的牙前治疗。材料与方法:将15例慢性牙周炎患者随机分为试验组和对照组。治疗包括:SRP+安慰剂(对照组),SRP+低剂量多西环素(LDD)每天两次,持续6个月(连续LDD),在I期结束后的第一个和第三个两个月(循环LDD), SRP+LDD每天两次。在基线和治疗结束后1个月和6个月测量并记录牙龈指标,包括:探探深度(PD)、临床附着水平(CAL)、改良牙龈指数(MGI)和O 'leary菌斑指数。数据分析采用单因素方差分析和Kruskal-Wallis检验。结果:LDD组和LDD组的探查深度减小均显著大于对照组(p<0.01)。然而,这种减少发生在基线和随访期间。换句话说,1个月和6个月的评估差异不显著(p=0.25)。与其他组相比,连续LDD方案显示口袋大于5mm的PD额外减少(从5.40到2.06mm)。结论:在本研究的局限性范围内,即使在斑块控制不佳的患者中,低剂量强力霉素辅助连续循环方案也能提高常规治疗的临床疗效。关键词:慢性牙周炎,抗生素,强力霉素,辅助治疗
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EVALUATION OF CLINICAL EFFICACY OF TWO LOW-DOSE DOXYCYCLINE REGIMEN IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC PERIODONTITIS
Statement of Problems: Incomplete therapy of periodontal diseases treated with scalling and root planning (SRP) has been resulted in improvement of host- modulated therapy (HMT) as a new method. Purpuse: Introducing an adjunctive therapy in addition to SRP in managing of destructive preiodontal therapy was the main purpose of this study. Materials and Method: Fifteen patients suffered from chronic periodontitis were randomly assigned to test and control groups. Treatment consisted of: SRP+ placebo (control group), SRP+ low dose doxycycline (LDD) twice daily for six months (continous LDD), and SRP+LDD twice daily for first and third two months after completion of phase I (cyclic LDD). Gingival indices including: probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), modified gingival index (MGI), and O’leary plaque index were measured and recorded at baseline and at one and six months after the completion of therapy. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: Probing depth reduction in both of LDD groups were significantly greater than control group (p<0.01). However, this reduction happened between baseline and follow-up oppointments. In other word, the differences between the 1-and 6-month evaluation were not significant (p=0.25). Continous LDD regimen showed an additional PD reduction (from 5.40 to 2.06mm) for pockets greater than 5mm in comparison to the other groups. Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, the results showed that adjunctive continous and cyclic regimen of low-dose doxycycline can improve the clinical efficacy of conventional therapy, even in patients with less than favorable plaque control. Key words: Chronic periodontitis, Antibiotic, Doxycycline, Adjunctive therapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信