治疗关系中四个特定共同因素的可能神经生物学相关关系

Eugenio Gallo, Giuseppe Berti Ceroni
{"title":"治疗关系中四个特定共同因素的可能神经生物学相关关系","authors":"Eugenio Gallo,&nbsp;Giuseppe Berti Ceroni","doi":"10.1016/j.quip.2010.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Four specific therapeutic factors (previously considered non-specific) that are common to all care activities seem to be correlated with treatment outcomes. Our hypothesis is that each factor has specific neurobiological underpinnings. Using an operationalized definition of each of the four factors, we conducted a search of the Medline database for neuroimaging and neurobiological studies conducted during the past decade.</p></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><p>On the basis of our review, we argue that the <em>clinician's communication style</em> could affect activity in the mirror neuron system and in theory of mind brain areas of both the patient and therapist, based on mutual comprehension. <em>Attention to patient history</em> could activate the patient's episodic memory. Transformation of memories to working memory could 1) allow the patient to become aware of them; 2) render mnestic traces usually stored in a long-term memory labile and therefore available for modification; and 3) facilitate calibration of emotions by cognitive conflict-induced activation of the anterior-dorsal cingulate cortex with inhibition of the ventral one. <em>Calibration of expectations</em> could activate in advance the neural networks on which the expected response depends and “reward circuits,” thereby avoiding the so-called nocebo effect. The <em>therapeutic alliance</em> includes two interacting components: 1) cooperation, which depends on prefrontal cortex inhibition of behavior aimed at immediate reward, and 2) attachment, which might involve modulation of the anxiety and “theory of mind” networks. The neurobiological hypotheses presented above seem to support the view that each factor plays a partly specific role in the therapeutic process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101052,"journal":{"name":"Quaderni Italiani di Psichiatria","volume":"30 1","pages":"Pages 43-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.quip.2010.12.002","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Possibili correlati neurobiologici di quattro specifici fattori comuni della relazione terapeutica\",\"authors\":\"Eugenio Gallo,&nbsp;Giuseppe Berti Ceroni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.quip.2010.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Four specific therapeutic factors (previously considered non-specific) that are common to all care activities seem to be correlated with treatment outcomes. Our hypothesis is that each factor has specific neurobiological underpinnings. Using an operationalized definition of each of the four factors, we conducted a search of the Medline database for neuroimaging and neurobiological studies conducted during the past decade.</p></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><p>On the basis of our review, we argue that the <em>clinician's communication style</em> could affect activity in the mirror neuron system and in theory of mind brain areas of both the patient and therapist, based on mutual comprehension. <em>Attention to patient history</em> could activate the patient's episodic memory. Transformation of memories to working memory could 1) allow the patient to become aware of them; 2) render mnestic traces usually stored in a long-term memory labile and therefore available for modification; and 3) facilitate calibration of emotions by cognitive conflict-induced activation of the anterior-dorsal cingulate cortex with inhibition of the ventral one. <em>Calibration of expectations</em> could activate in advance the neural networks on which the expected response depends and “reward circuits,” thereby avoiding the so-called nocebo effect. The <em>therapeutic alliance</em> includes two interacting components: 1) cooperation, which depends on prefrontal cortex inhibition of behavior aimed at immediate reward, and 2) attachment, which might involve modulation of the anxiety and “theory of mind” networks. The neurobiological hypotheses presented above seem to support the view that each factor plays a partly specific role in the therapeutic process.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quaderni Italiani di Psichiatria\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 43-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.quip.2010.12.002\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quaderni Italiani di Psichiatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S039306451000071X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaderni Italiani di Psichiatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S039306451000071X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

所有护理活动共有的四个特定治疗因素(以前认为是非特异性的)似乎与治疗结果相关。我们的假设是,每个因素都有特定的神经生物学基础。使用四个因素的操作化定义,我们在Medline数据库中搜索了过去十年中进行的神经影像学和神经生物学研究。结果和结论基于我们的综述,我们认为临床医生的沟通方式可以影响镜像神经元系统的活动,以及基于相互理解的患者和治疗师的心理脑区域的理论活动。注意病史可以激活患者的情景记忆。将记忆转化为工作记忆可以1)让病人意识到它们;2)使通常存储在长期记忆中的记忆轨迹变得不稳定,因此可以修改;3)认知冲突诱导的前背扣带皮层激活和腹侧扣带皮层抑制促进情绪校准。预期的校准可以提前激活预期反应所依赖的神经网络和“奖励回路”,从而避免所谓的反安慰剂效应。治疗联盟包括两个相互作用的组成部分:1)合作,它依赖于前额叶皮层对以即时奖励为目标的行为的抑制;2)依恋,它可能涉及焦虑和“心理理论”网络的调节。以上提出的神经生物学假说似乎支持这样一种观点,即每个因素在治疗过程中都起着部分特定的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Possibili correlati neurobiologici di quattro specifici fattori comuni della relazione terapeutica

Introduction

Four specific therapeutic factors (previously considered non-specific) that are common to all care activities seem to be correlated with treatment outcomes. Our hypothesis is that each factor has specific neurobiological underpinnings. Using an operationalized definition of each of the four factors, we conducted a search of the Medline database for neuroimaging and neurobiological studies conducted during the past decade.

Results and conclusions

On the basis of our review, we argue that the clinician's communication style could affect activity in the mirror neuron system and in theory of mind brain areas of both the patient and therapist, based on mutual comprehension. Attention to patient history could activate the patient's episodic memory. Transformation of memories to working memory could 1) allow the patient to become aware of them; 2) render mnestic traces usually stored in a long-term memory labile and therefore available for modification; and 3) facilitate calibration of emotions by cognitive conflict-induced activation of the anterior-dorsal cingulate cortex with inhibition of the ventral one. Calibration of expectations could activate in advance the neural networks on which the expected response depends and “reward circuits,” thereby avoiding the so-called nocebo effect. The therapeutic alliance includes two interacting components: 1) cooperation, which depends on prefrontal cortex inhibition of behavior aimed at immediate reward, and 2) attachment, which might involve modulation of the anxiety and “theory of mind” networks. The neurobiological hypotheses presented above seem to support the view that each factor plays a partly specific role in the therapeutic process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信