导管测量的临床方面

J. Lederer
{"title":"导管测量的临床方面","authors":"J. Lederer","doi":"10.1111/J.1444-0938.1952.TB01964.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY \n \nDuctions (prism vergences, fusional reserves, fusional amplitudes) measure the visual mechanism's resistance to induced diplopia, i.e., the “strength of the fusion compulsion reflex.” The eye movements induced during duction measurements are artificially produced fusion movements of positive or negative “fusional” convergence and are essentially reflex (involuntary) in nature, although they can be increased, in some individuals at least, by voluntary effort. Only the horizontal ductions measured at 33 cm. from the eyes (near ductions) will be considered here. Viewed somewhat differently, these measure the degree to which the accommodation-convergence relationship can be embarrassed (by placing horizontal prisms of increasing strength before the eyes) before diplopia becomes manifest. Since the break and recovery point readings differ by an average of 10Δ, somewhat different mechanisms seem to be involved. It would appear that the break point is a measure of the resistance to increasing amounts of induced diplopia, whilst the recovery point is more directly related to the “fusion compulsion reflex,” i.e., the binocular fixation reflex.","PeriodicalId":88139,"journal":{"name":"The Australasian journal of optometry","volume":"12 1","pages":"441-444"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1952-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CLINICAL ASPECTS OF DUCTION MEASUREMENTS\",\"authors\":\"J. Lederer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1444-0938.1952.TB01964.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SUMMARY \\n \\nDuctions (prism vergences, fusional reserves, fusional amplitudes) measure the visual mechanism's resistance to induced diplopia, i.e., the “strength of the fusion compulsion reflex.” The eye movements induced during duction measurements are artificially produced fusion movements of positive or negative “fusional” convergence and are essentially reflex (involuntary) in nature, although they can be increased, in some individuals at least, by voluntary effort. Only the horizontal ductions measured at 33 cm. from the eyes (near ductions) will be considered here. Viewed somewhat differently, these measure the degree to which the accommodation-convergence relationship can be embarrassed (by placing horizontal prisms of increasing strength before the eyes) before diplopia becomes manifest. Since the break and recovery point readings differ by an average of 10Δ, somewhat different mechanisms seem to be involved. It would appear that the break point is a measure of the resistance to increasing amounts of induced diplopia, whilst the recovery point is more directly related to the “fusion compulsion reflex,” i.e., the binocular fixation reflex.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Australasian journal of optometry\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"441-444\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1952-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Australasian journal of optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1444-0938.1952.TB01964.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australasian journal of optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1444-0938.1952.TB01964.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

屈光度(棱镜辐角、融合储备、融合幅度)衡量视觉机制对诱发复视的抵抗,即“融合强迫反射的强度”。在感应测量期间引起的眼球运动是人工产生的正或负“融合”收敛的融合运动,本质上是反射(不自主)的,尽管它们可以增加,至少在一些个体中,通过自愿的努力。只有水平的凹槽测量为33厘米。从眼睛(近导管)将考虑在这里。从不同的角度来看,这些测量了在复视出现之前,调节-收敛关系可能会尴尬的程度(通过在眼睛前放置强度增加的水平棱镜)。由于中断点和恢复点读数平均相差10Δ,因此似乎涉及到一些不同的机制。由此看来,断点是对增加的诱导复视的抵抗程度的一种度量,而恢复点则与“融合强迫反射”,即双眼注视反射更直接相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CLINICAL ASPECTS OF DUCTION MEASUREMENTS
SUMMARY Ductions (prism vergences, fusional reserves, fusional amplitudes) measure the visual mechanism's resistance to induced diplopia, i.e., the “strength of the fusion compulsion reflex.” The eye movements induced during duction measurements are artificially produced fusion movements of positive or negative “fusional” convergence and are essentially reflex (involuntary) in nature, although they can be increased, in some individuals at least, by voluntary effort. Only the horizontal ductions measured at 33 cm. from the eyes (near ductions) will be considered here. Viewed somewhat differently, these measure the degree to which the accommodation-convergence relationship can be embarrassed (by placing horizontal prisms of increasing strength before the eyes) before diplopia becomes manifest. Since the break and recovery point readings differ by an average of 10Δ, somewhat different mechanisms seem to be involved. It would appear that the break point is a measure of the resistance to increasing amounts of induced diplopia, whilst the recovery point is more directly related to the “fusion compulsion reflex,” i.e., the binocular fixation reflex.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信