主键一致性查询应答

Paraschos Koutris, J. Wijsen
{"title":"主键一致性查询应答","authors":"Paraschos Koutris, J. Wijsen","doi":"10.1145/2949741.2949746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the complexity of consistent query answering with respect to primary key violations, for self-join-free conjunctive queries. A repair of a possibly inconsistent database is obtained by selecting a maximal number of tuples without selecting two distinct tuples with the same primary key value. For any Boolean query q, CERTAINTY(q) is the problem that takes a database as input, and asks whether q is true in every repair of the database. The complexity of this problem has been extensively studied for q ranging over the class of self-join-free Boolean conjunctive queries. A research challenge is to determine, given q, whether CERTAINTY(q) belongs to complexity classes FO, P, or coNP-complete. We show that for any self-join-free Boolean conjunctive query q, it can be decided whether or not CERTAINTY(q) is in FO. Further, CERTAINTY(q) is either in P or coNP-complete, and the complexity dichotomy is effective. This settles a research question of practical relevance that has been open for ten years.","PeriodicalId":21740,"journal":{"name":"SIGMOD Rec.","volume":"3637 1","pages":"15-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consistent Query Answering for Primary Keys\",\"authors\":\"Paraschos Koutris, J. Wijsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2949741.2949746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study the complexity of consistent query answering with respect to primary key violations, for self-join-free conjunctive queries. A repair of a possibly inconsistent database is obtained by selecting a maximal number of tuples without selecting two distinct tuples with the same primary key value. For any Boolean query q, CERTAINTY(q) is the problem that takes a database as input, and asks whether q is true in every repair of the database. The complexity of this problem has been extensively studied for q ranging over the class of self-join-free Boolean conjunctive queries. A research challenge is to determine, given q, whether CERTAINTY(q) belongs to complexity classes FO, P, or coNP-complete. We show that for any self-join-free Boolean conjunctive query q, it can be decided whether or not CERTAINTY(q) is in FO. Further, CERTAINTY(q) is either in P or coNP-complete, and the complexity dichotomy is effective. This settles a research question of practical relevance that has been open for ten years.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SIGMOD Rec.\",\"volume\":\"3637 1\",\"pages\":\"15-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SIGMOD Rec.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2949741.2949746\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGMOD Rec.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2949741.2949746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

我们研究了关于主键违反的一致性查询应答的复杂性,对于自连接无连接查询。通过选择最大数量的元组,而不选择具有相同主键值的两个不同的元组,可以修复可能不一致的数据库。对于任何布尔查询q,确定性(q)是将数据库作为输入的问题,并在每次修复数据库时询问q是否为真。这个问题的复杂性已经被广泛地研究了q类自连接无布尔合查询。一个研究挑战是,给定q,确定确定性(q)是否属于复杂度类FO, P,或coNP-complete。证明了对于任意自连接无布尔合查询q,可以判定确定性(q)是否在FO中。进一步,确定性(q)要么是P完备的,要么是conp完备的,并且复杂度二分法是有效的。这就解决了一个存在了十年的具有实际意义的研究问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consistent Query Answering for Primary Keys
We study the complexity of consistent query answering with respect to primary key violations, for self-join-free conjunctive queries. A repair of a possibly inconsistent database is obtained by selecting a maximal number of tuples without selecting two distinct tuples with the same primary key value. For any Boolean query q, CERTAINTY(q) is the problem that takes a database as input, and asks whether q is true in every repair of the database. The complexity of this problem has been extensively studied for q ranging over the class of self-join-free Boolean conjunctive queries. A research challenge is to determine, given q, whether CERTAINTY(q) belongs to complexity classes FO, P, or coNP-complete. We show that for any self-join-free Boolean conjunctive query q, it can be decided whether or not CERTAINTY(q) is in FO. Further, CERTAINTY(q) is either in P or coNP-complete, and the complexity dichotomy is effective. This settles a research question of practical relevance that has been open for ten years.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信