e-Learning中开源学习管理系统软件的评价

A. Imran, M. Ahmed, S. Farid, M. D. Khattak
{"title":"e-Learning中开源学习管理系统软件的评价","authors":"A. Imran, M. Ahmed, S. Farid, M. D. Khattak","doi":"10.26692/surj/2020.03.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of e-learning is increasing in the educational sector. New tools and technologies are being introduced to blend the technology within educational boundaries. The most important tools used to implement e-learning is the Learning Management System. There are large number of LMS available which are being used by the universities, colleges and schools. The selection of LMS is critical for the success of any e-learning system. This paper compares seven open source LMS i.e. Moodle, ATutor, Chamilo, Claroline, Efront, Docebo and Dokeos. The comparison is made on the basis of technical parameters and the communication tools. It has been made through practical installation and literature review. The results show that all the LMS are cross platform and based on PHP technology. All of the them have My Sql as the backend database. MOODLE and Atutor have additional support for Microsoft and Oracle. Both of them also provide the maximum communication sub tools. The specifications of e-learning standards were found to be more diversely described in different LMS. The comparison will help the administrators and educators to set a criterion according to their needs and adopt LMS which is suitable for their requirements.","PeriodicalId":21859,"journal":{"name":"Sindh University Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Evaluation of Open Source Learning Management System Software in e-Learning\",\"authors\":\"A. Imran, M. Ahmed, S. Farid, M. D. Khattak\",\"doi\":\"10.26692/surj/2020.03.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of e-learning is increasing in the educational sector. New tools and technologies are being introduced to blend the technology within educational boundaries. The most important tools used to implement e-learning is the Learning Management System. There are large number of LMS available which are being used by the universities, colleges and schools. The selection of LMS is critical for the success of any e-learning system. This paper compares seven open source LMS i.e. Moodle, ATutor, Chamilo, Claroline, Efront, Docebo and Dokeos. The comparison is made on the basis of technical parameters and the communication tools. It has been made through practical installation and literature review. The results show that all the LMS are cross platform and based on PHP technology. All of the them have My Sql as the backend database. MOODLE and Atutor have additional support for Microsoft and Oracle. Both of them also provide the maximum communication sub tools. The specifications of e-learning standards were found to be more diversely described in different LMS. The comparison will help the administrators and educators to set a criterion according to their needs and adopt LMS which is suitable for their requirements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sindh University Research Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sindh University Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26692/surj/2020.03.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sindh University Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26692/surj/2020.03.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教育部门越来越多地使用电子学习。正在引入新的工具和技术,将技术融入教育范围。用于实施电子学习的最重要工具是学习管理系统。有大量的LMS可供大学、学院和学校使用。LMS的选择对于任何电子学习系统的成功都是至关重要的。本文比较了Moodle、attutor、Chamilo、Claroline、Efront、Docebo和Dokeos这七种开源LMS。在技术参数和通信工具的基础上进行了比较。通过实际安装和文献综述得出结论。结果表明,所有LMS都是跨平台的,并且基于PHP技术。他们都有mysql作为后端数据库。MOODLE和attutor对Microsoft和Oracle有额外的支持。它们都提供了最大限度的通信子工具。研究发现,在不同的LMS中,对电子学习标准规范的描述更为多样化。通过比较,可以帮助管理人员和教育工作者根据自己的需要制定标准,采用适合自己需求的LMS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Evaluation of Open Source Learning Management System Software in e-Learning
The use of e-learning is increasing in the educational sector. New tools and technologies are being introduced to blend the technology within educational boundaries. The most important tools used to implement e-learning is the Learning Management System. There are large number of LMS available which are being used by the universities, colleges and schools. The selection of LMS is critical for the success of any e-learning system. This paper compares seven open source LMS i.e. Moodle, ATutor, Chamilo, Claroline, Efront, Docebo and Dokeos. The comparison is made on the basis of technical parameters and the communication tools. It has been made through practical installation and literature review. The results show that all the LMS are cross platform and based on PHP technology. All of the them have My Sql as the backend database. MOODLE and Atutor have additional support for Microsoft and Oracle. Both of them also provide the maximum communication sub tools. The specifications of e-learning standards were found to be more diversely described in different LMS. The comparison will help the administrators and educators to set a criterion according to their needs and adopt LMS which is suitable for their requirements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信