测量小儿人群闭塞效应的有效元音刺激

H. Shetty, S. Narasimhan, Sharath Mahanthesh
{"title":"测量小儿人群闭塞效应的有效元音刺激","authors":"H. Shetty, S. Narasimhan, Sharath Mahanthesh","doi":"10.3390/ohbm4020007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Past studies have reported that there are higher sound-pressure levels for each vowel in a child’s ear canal than those in adults due to reduced volume and a shorter ear canal. Furthermore, longer vocal tracts are associated with lower formant frequencies, and vice versa. The structural differences in this regard may reflect the difference in the occlusion effect. Thus, the present study compares the sound pressure levels (SPLs) and first formant frequencies of children and adults with normal hearing and determines the best vowel stimulus to assess the occlusion effect. A repeated measures research design was utilized to investigate the best stimulus with which to measure the occlusion effect among children and adults. Group 1 included ten children, and Group 2 comprised ten adults with normal hearing. The SPLs at frequencies between 200 Hz and 1000 Hz for three uttered vowels, with steps of 100 Hz, were measured using a hearing aid analyzer. The recorded vowels were saved in a ‘.wav’ format for formant frequency analysis. Furthermore, a paired comparison method was used to identify the vowel stimulus that most effectively induced the occlusion effect. A significantly higher SPL was observed for children compared to adults for each vowel. The formant frequency F1 value was higher for children than adults for each vowel, constituting a significant finding. In the paired comparison, the occlusion effect was reported to be significantly greater with respect to the vowel /u/ among adults, while it was reported to be greater in relation to the vowel /i/ among children. The vowel /u/ was the best stimulus with which to assess the occlusion effect among adults. The vowel /i/ was the best stimulus with which to assess the occlusion effect among children.","PeriodicalId":73883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of otorhinolaryngology, hearing and balance medicine","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective Vowel Stimuli for Measuring Occlusion Effect in the Pediatric Population\",\"authors\":\"H. Shetty, S. Narasimhan, Sharath Mahanthesh\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ohbm4020007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Past studies have reported that there are higher sound-pressure levels for each vowel in a child’s ear canal than those in adults due to reduced volume and a shorter ear canal. Furthermore, longer vocal tracts are associated with lower formant frequencies, and vice versa. The structural differences in this regard may reflect the difference in the occlusion effect. Thus, the present study compares the sound pressure levels (SPLs) and first formant frequencies of children and adults with normal hearing and determines the best vowel stimulus to assess the occlusion effect. A repeated measures research design was utilized to investigate the best stimulus with which to measure the occlusion effect among children and adults. Group 1 included ten children, and Group 2 comprised ten adults with normal hearing. The SPLs at frequencies between 200 Hz and 1000 Hz for three uttered vowels, with steps of 100 Hz, were measured using a hearing aid analyzer. The recorded vowels were saved in a ‘.wav’ format for formant frequency analysis. Furthermore, a paired comparison method was used to identify the vowel stimulus that most effectively induced the occlusion effect. A significantly higher SPL was observed for children compared to adults for each vowel. The formant frequency F1 value was higher for children than adults for each vowel, constituting a significant finding. In the paired comparison, the occlusion effect was reported to be significantly greater with respect to the vowel /u/ among adults, while it was reported to be greater in relation to the vowel /i/ among children. The vowel /u/ was the best stimulus with which to assess the occlusion effect among adults. The vowel /i/ was the best stimulus with which to assess the occlusion effect among children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of otorhinolaryngology, hearing and balance medicine\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of otorhinolaryngology, hearing and balance medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ohbm4020007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of otorhinolaryngology, hearing and balance medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ohbm4020007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过去的研究表明,儿童耳道中每个元音的声压水平比成人高,这是由于儿童耳道体积较小,耳道较短。此外,较长的声道与较低的峰频率有关,反之亦然。这方面的结构差异可能反映了遮挡效果的差异。因此,本研究比较了听力正常的儿童和成人的声压级(SPLs)和第一形成峰频率,确定了最佳的元音刺激来评估闭塞效果。采用重复测量研究设计来研究儿童和成人中测量闭塞效应的最佳刺激。第1组10名儿童,第2组10名听力正常的成人。使用助听器分析仪测量了三个元音在200 Hz和1000 Hz频率之间的声压差,步长为100 Hz。所记录的元音以“。wav”格式保存,以便进行形成峰频率分析。此外,采用配对比较的方法来识别最有效地诱导闭塞效应的元音刺激。在每个元音上,儿童的声压级明显高于成人。对于每个元音,儿童的形成峰频率F1值高于成人,这是一个重要的发现。在配对比较中,据报道,在成人中,对元音/u/的闭塞效应明显更大,而在儿童中,对元音/i/的闭塞效应更大。元音/u/是评价成人咬合效果的最佳刺激物。元音/i/是评估儿童咬合效果的最佳刺激物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effective Vowel Stimuli for Measuring Occlusion Effect in the Pediatric Population
Past studies have reported that there are higher sound-pressure levels for each vowel in a child’s ear canal than those in adults due to reduced volume and a shorter ear canal. Furthermore, longer vocal tracts are associated with lower formant frequencies, and vice versa. The structural differences in this regard may reflect the difference in the occlusion effect. Thus, the present study compares the sound pressure levels (SPLs) and first formant frequencies of children and adults with normal hearing and determines the best vowel stimulus to assess the occlusion effect. A repeated measures research design was utilized to investigate the best stimulus with which to measure the occlusion effect among children and adults. Group 1 included ten children, and Group 2 comprised ten adults with normal hearing. The SPLs at frequencies between 200 Hz and 1000 Hz for three uttered vowels, with steps of 100 Hz, were measured using a hearing aid analyzer. The recorded vowels were saved in a ‘.wav’ format for formant frequency analysis. Furthermore, a paired comparison method was used to identify the vowel stimulus that most effectively induced the occlusion effect. A significantly higher SPL was observed for children compared to adults for each vowel. The formant frequency F1 value was higher for children than adults for each vowel, constituting a significant finding. In the paired comparison, the occlusion effect was reported to be significantly greater with respect to the vowel /u/ among adults, while it was reported to be greater in relation to the vowel /i/ among children. The vowel /u/ was the best stimulus with which to assess the occlusion effect among adults. The vowel /i/ was the best stimulus with which to assess the occlusion effect among children.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信