M. Yusuf , N. Yogiswara , M.A. Soebadi , G.W.K. Duarsa , S. Wirjopranoto
{"title":"阴茎骨折的即时和延迟手术干预的长期结果比较:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"M. Yusuf , N. Yogiswara , M.A. Soebadi , G.W.K. Duarsa , S. Wirjopranoto","doi":"10.1016/j.sexol.2022.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p><span>Penile fracture is a rare </span>urological trauma that needs immediate repair. However, several reports stated that a delayed surgical repair might be acceptable. Thus, we aim to evaluate the long-term outcomes of immediate and delayed surgical intervention for penile fracture treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews<span> and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines to perform this meta-analysis. A comprehensive search through PubMed, Scopus, and Science-direct was performed using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH®) Terms. The primary outcome analyzed in this study was long-term complications, including erectile dysfunction<span> (ED), penile curvature, penile pain, and palpable plaque. The publication bias was assessed using funnel plot and Harbord's test. All analyses were performed using STATA® 16 and the protocol for the meta-analysis has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022315154).</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 10 studies were included in the analysis, comprising 2 prospective studies, 5 retrospective studies, and 3 case series, for a total of 531 patients with penile fractures. From the pooled analysis, lower ED incidence in the immediate surgical repair group was significant on less than 12 months follow-up (OR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.89, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.03). However, this difference was not significant on longer follow-up (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 0.29 to 6.58, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.68). No significant difference was found in the incidence of palpable plaque (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.26 to 2.12, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.57). Additionally, penile pain/paresthesia (OR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.51, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.01) and penile curvature incidence (OR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.47, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.01) was also significantly lower in the immediate repair group than the delayed approach group. The funnel plot analysis and Harbord's test did not suggest any publication bias (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.804).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Immediate surgical intervention remains the best option for penile fracture treatment due to reduced risk of long-term complications, including penile pain and penile curvature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45416,"journal":{"name":"Sexologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term outcomes comparison of immediate and delayed surgical intervention for penile fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"M. Yusuf , N. Yogiswara , M.A. Soebadi , G.W.K. Duarsa , S. Wirjopranoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sexol.2022.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p><span>Penile fracture is a rare </span>urological trauma that needs immediate repair. However, several reports stated that a delayed surgical repair might be acceptable. Thus, we aim to evaluate the long-term outcomes of immediate and delayed surgical intervention for penile fracture treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews<span> and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines to perform this meta-analysis. A comprehensive search through PubMed, Scopus, and Science-direct was performed using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH®) Terms. The primary outcome analyzed in this study was long-term complications, including erectile dysfunction<span> (ED), penile curvature, penile pain, and palpable plaque. The publication bias was assessed using funnel plot and Harbord's test. All analyses were performed using STATA® 16 and the protocol for the meta-analysis has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022315154).</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 10 studies were included in the analysis, comprising 2 prospective studies, 5 retrospective studies, and 3 case series, for a total of 531 patients with penile fractures. From the pooled analysis, lower ED incidence in the immediate surgical repair group was significant on less than 12 months follow-up (OR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.89, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.03). However, this difference was not significant on longer follow-up (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 0.29 to 6.58, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.68). No significant difference was found in the incidence of palpable plaque (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.26 to 2.12, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.57). Additionally, penile pain/paresthesia (OR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.51, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.01) and penile curvature incidence (OR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.47, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.01) was also significantly lower in the immediate repair group than the delayed approach group. The funnel plot analysis and Harbord's test did not suggest any publication bias (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.804).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Immediate surgical intervention remains the best option for penile fracture treatment due to reduced risk of long-term complications, including penile pain and penile curvature.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexologies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1158136022000858\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1158136022000858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
前言与目的阴茎骨折是一种罕见的泌尿外科创伤,需要立即修复。然而,一些报告指出,延迟手术修复可能是可以接受的。因此,我们的目的是评估阴茎骨折治疗的即时和延迟手术干预的长期结果。材料和方法我们遵循系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA) 2020指南进行本荟萃分析。通过PubMed、Scopus和Science-direct进行综合搜索,使用医学主题标题(MeSH®)术语。本研究分析的主要结局是长期并发症,包括勃起功能障碍(ED)、阴茎弯曲、阴茎疼痛和可触及的斑块。采用漏斗图和Harbord检验评估发表偏倚。所有分析均使用STATA®16进行,meta分析方案已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42022315154)。结果共纳入10项研究,其中前瞻性研究2项,回顾性研究5项,病例系列3项,共纳入531例阴茎骨折患者。从汇总分析来看,在不到12个月的随访中,立即手术修复组ED发生率较低(OR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.15 ~ 0.89, P = 0.03)。然而,在更长时间的随访中,这种差异不显著(OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 0.29 ~ 6.58, P = 0.68)。两组可触及斑块的发生率无显著差异(OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.26 ~ 2.12, P = 0.57)。此外,阴茎疼痛/感觉异常(OR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.06 ~ 0.51, P <0.01)和阴茎弯曲发生率(OR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.06 ~ 0.47, P <0.01),即刻修复组明显低于延迟入路组。漏斗图分析和Harbord检验未发现任何发表偏倚(P = 0.804)。结论立即手术治疗仍然是阴茎骨折治疗的最佳选择,因为手术可以减少阴茎疼痛和阴茎弯曲等长期并发症的风险。
Long-term outcomes comparison of immediate and delayed surgical intervention for penile fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Introduction and objectives
Penile fracture is a rare urological trauma that needs immediate repair. However, several reports stated that a delayed surgical repair might be acceptable. Thus, we aim to evaluate the long-term outcomes of immediate and delayed surgical intervention for penile fracture treatment.
Materials and methods
We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines to perform this meta-analysis. A comprehensive search through PubMed, Scopus, and Science-direct was performed using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH®) Terms. The primary outcome analyzed in this study was long-term complications, including erectile dysfunction (ED), penile curvature, penile pain, and palpable plaque. The publication bias was assessed using funnel plot and Harbord's test. All analyses were performed using STATA® 16 and the protocol for the meta-analysis has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022315154).
Results
A total of 10 studies were included in the analysis, comprising 2 prospective studies, 5 retrospective studies, and 3 case series, for a total of 531 patients with penile fractures. From the pooled analysis, lower ED incidence in the immediate surgical repair group was significant on less than 12 months follow-up (OR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.89, P = 0.03). However, this difference was not significant on longer follow-up (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 0.29 to 6.58, P = 0.68). No significant difference was found in the incidence of palpable plaque (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.26 to 2.12, P = 0.57). Additionally, penile pain/paresthesia (OR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.51, P < 0.01) and penile curvature incidence (OR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.47, P < 0.01) was also significantly lower in the immediate repair group than the delayed approach group. The funnel plot analysis and Harbord's test did not suggest any publication bias (P = 0.804).
Conclusion
Immediate surgical intervention remains the best option for penile fracture treatment due to reduced risk of long-term complications, including penile pain and penile curvature.
期刊介绍:
Sexologies offers a large panel of information to all health professionals working in the field of sexuality: anatomophysiological and basic research; psychodynamic, cognitive, behavioural and relational evaluations of sexual difficulties; epidemiological, sociological, forensic data; information on new sexoactive molecules; research on sexual physiology, reports on specialized congresses; press and books reviews; ethical aspects; calendar of major events of sexology around the world.