{"title":"解剖学","authors":"R. Berry","doi":"10.1136/bmj.c4272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In view of the opinion so frequently expressed, that the science of human anatomy reached finality many generations ago, and that further progress in this direction is to-day an impossibility, it may not be amiss to take the opportunity afforded by the Centenary issue of this Journal to review the facts themselves, and to see what degree of truth, or the reverse, there is in the above-mentioned currently expressed opinion. It may be stated at once that all those who believe human anatomy to be an effete science are not","PeriodicalId":11487,"journal":{"name":"Edinburgh Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anatomy\",\"authors\":\"R. Berry\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmj.c4272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In view of the opinion so frequently expressed, that the science of human anatomy reached finality many generations ago, and that further progress in this direction is to-day an impossibility, it may not be amiss to take the opportunity afforded by the Centenary issue of this Journal to review the facts themselves, and to see what degree of truth, or the reverse, there is in the above-mentioned currently expressed opinion. It may be stated at once that all those who believe human anatomy to be an effete science are not\",\"PeriodicalId\":11487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Edinburgh Medical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Edinburgh Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c4272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edinburgh Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c4272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In view of the opinion so frequently expressed, that the science of human anatomy reached finality many generations ago, and that further progress in this direction is to-day an impossibility, it may not be amiss to take the opportunity afforded by the Centenary issue of this Journal to review the facts themselves, and to see what degree of truth, or the reverse, there is in the above-mentioned currently expressed opinion. It may be stated at once that all those who believe human anatomy to be an effete science are not
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
