第三条道路的路线图

A. Barrientos, Martin Powell
{"title":"第三条道路的路线图","authors":"A. Barrientos, Martin Powell","doi":"10.7765/9781526137883.00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the ‘Third Way’ has had many previous incarnations, the current version is generally said to have originated with the New Democrats and the Clinton administration, from 1992 in the USA,1 and been taken up by Blair’s New Labour Government in the UK. However, there remains widespread debate over whether the term is applicable only to the Anglo-Saxon ‘liberal’ welfare states of the UK and the USA, or whether it is meaningful for the ‘social democratic’ and ‘Christian democratic’ countries of continental Europe. The main aim of this chapter is to place the debate about the Third Way in the wider context of European social policy. According to Merkel,2 at the end of the twentieth century the debate about the Third Way has become the most important reform discourse in the European party landscape. Giddens3 claims that almost all Centre-Left parties have restructured their doctrines in response to it. Callinicos4 writes that the Third Way has set the agenda for the moderate Left on a European, and indeed a global, scale. Gould5 claims that it is ‘now arguably the dominant political approach throughout the world’. The Third Way is seen as a trail-blazer for a new global social policy, a new model for a new millenium.6 As President Clinton’s former Secretary for Labour Robert Reich puts it: ‘We are all third-wayers now.’ However, if the Third Way is important, it is also difficult to define.7 As Pierson8 puts it, the Third Way has been hotly contested but consistently underspecified. Clift9 argues that it needs more rigourous definition before firm conclusions can be drawn about its compatibility with contemporary European social democracy. In the words of Przeworski,10 how many ways can be third? Merkel11 claims that there are four distinct ‘Third Way models’ in Europe. Giddens12 argues that social democratic parties in Germany, France and perhaps the Scandinavian countries have been following their own ‘Third Ways’. Etzioni13 sees the countries of continental Europe, the UK and the USA as ‘different Third Way societies’. He points out that while societies such as the French and the Italian drive more in the Left lane with others such as the USA more on the Right, HALE MAKE-UP 23/10/03 8:21 am Page 9","PeriodicalId":22973,"journal":{"name":"The Third Way and beyond","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The route map of the Third Way\",\"authors\":\"A. Barrientos, Martin Powell\",\"doi\":\"10.7765/9781526137883.00006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although the ‘Third Way’ has had many previous incarnations, the current version is generally said to have originated with the New Democrats and the Clinton administration, from 1992 in the USA,1 and been taken up by Blair’s New Labour Government in the UK. However, there remains widespread debate over whether the term is applicable only to the Anglo-Saxon ‘liberal’ welfare states of the UK and the USA, or whether it is meaningful for the ‘social democratic’ and ‘Christian democratic’ countries of continental Europe. The main aim of this chapter is to place the debate about the Third Way in the wider context of European social policy. According to Merkel,2 at the end of the twentieth century the debate about the Third Way has become the most important reform discourse in the European party landscape. Giddens3 claims that almost all Centre-Left parties have restructured their doctrines in response to it. Callinicos4 writes that the Third Way has set the agenda for the moderate Left on a European, and indeed a global, scale. Gould5 claims that it is ‘now arguably the dominant political approach throughout the world’. The Third Way is seen as a trail-blazer for a new global social policy, a new model for a new millenium.6 As President Clinton’s former Secretary for Labour Robert Reich puts it: ‘We are all third-wayers now.’ However, if the Third Way is important, it is also difficult to define.7 As Pierson8 puts it, the Third Way has been hotly contested but consistently underspecified. Clift9 argues that it needs more rigourous definition before firm conclusions can be drawn about its compatibility with contemporary European social democracy. In the words of Przeworski,10 how many ways can be third? Merkel11 claims that there are four distinct ‘Third Way models’ in Europe. Giddens12 argues that social democratic parties in Germany, France and perhaps the Scandinavian countries have been following their own ‘Third Ways’. Etzioni13 sees the countries of continental Europe, the UK and the USA as ‘different Third Way societies’. He points out that while societies such as the French and the Italian drive more in the Left lane with others such as the USA more on the Right, HALE MAKE-UP 23/10/03 8:21 am Page 9\",\"PeriodicalId\":22973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Third Way and beyond\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Third Way and beyond\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137883.00006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Third Way and beyond","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137883.00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

虽然“第三条道路”有很多以前的化身,但目前的版本通常被认为起源于1992年美国的新民主党和克林顿政府,并被布莱尔的英国新工党政府所采用。然而,关于这个术语是否只适用于英国和美国的盎格鲁-撒克逊“自由”福利国家,或者它是否对欧洲大陆的“社会民主主义”和“基督教民主主义”国家有意义,仍然存在广泛的争论。本章的主要目的是将关于第三条道路的辩论置于欧洲社会政策的更广泛背景下。默克尔认为,20世纪末,关于“第三条道路”的辩论已成为欧洲政党格局中最重要的改革话语。吉登斯声称,几乎所有的中左翼政党都为此调整了自己的理论。Callinicos4写道,第三条道路为欧洲乃至全球范围内的温和左派设定了议程。Gould5声称,它“现在可以说是世界上占主导地位的政治方式”。“第三条道路”被视为新的全球社会政策的先驱,是新千年的新模式正如克林顿总统的前劳工部长罗伯特·赖克(Robert Reich)所说:“我们现在都是第三条道路。”然而,如果第三条道路很重要,它也很难定义正如皮尔森所说,“第三条道路”一直受到激烈的争论,但一直没有得到充分说明。克利夫特认为,在确定其与当代欧洲社会民主的兼容性之前,它需要更严格的定义。用普热沃斯基的话说,有多少种方法可以成为第三?默克尔声称欧洲有四种不同的“第三条道路”模式。吉登斯12认为,德国、法国或许还有斯堪的纳维亚国家的社会民主党一直在遵循自己的“第三条道路”。Etzioni13认为欧洲大陆国家、英国和美国是“不同的第三条道路社会”。他指出,虽然法国和意大利等社会更倾向于左车道行驶,而美国等其他社会则更倾向于右车道行驶
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The route map of the Third Way
Although the ‘Third Way’ has had many previous incarnations, the current version is generally said to have originated with the New Democrats and the Clinton administration, from 1992 in the USA,1 and been taken up by Blair’s New Labour Government in the UK. However, there remains widespread debate over whether the term is applicable only to the Anglo-Saxon ‘liberal’ welfare states of the UK and the USA, or whether it is meaningful for the ‘social democratic’ and ‘Christian democratic’ countries of continental Europe. The main aim of this chapter is to place the debate about the Third Way in the wider context of European social policy. According to Merkel,2 at the end of the twentieth century the debate about the Third Way has become the most important reform discourse in the European party landscape. Giddens3 claims that almost all Centre-Left parties have restructured their doctrines in response to it. Callinicos4 writes that the Third Way has set the agenda for the moderate Left on a European, and indeed a global, scale. Gould5 claims that it is ‘now arguably the dominant political approach throughout the world’. The Third Way is seen as a trail-blazer for a new global social policy, a new model for a new millenium.6 As President Clinton’s former Secretary for Labour Robert Reich puts it: ‘We are all third-wayers now.’ However, if the Third Way is important, it is also difficult to define.7 As Pierson8 puts it, the Third Way has been hotly contested but consistently underspecified. Clift9 argues that it needs more rigourous definition before firm conclusions can be drawn about its compatibility with contemporary European social democracy. In the words of Przeworski,10 how many ways can be third? Merkel11 claims that there are four distinct ‘Third Way models’ in Europe. Giddens12 argues that social democratic parties in Germany, France and perhaps the Scandinavian countries have been following their own ‘Third Ways’. Etzioni13 sees the countries of continental Europe, the UK and the USA as ‘different Third Way societies’. He points out that while societies such as the French and the Italian drive more in the Left lane with others such as the USA more on the Right, HALE MAKE-UP 23/10/03 8:21 am Page 9
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信