托马斯·阿奎那关于作为上帝意象的人的单一论和二元论的人类学观点

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY
Petr Slováček
{"title":"托马斯·阿奎那关于作为上帝意象的人的单一论和二元论的人类学观点","authors":"Petr Slováček","doi":"10.18778/1689-4286.50.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present text deals with two layers of philosophic psychology/anthropology in the works of Thomas Aquinas and strives to examine the mutual relationships and interrelated meanings between these layers while paying particular attention to the biblical image of a human being as imago Dei. With respect to this aim, the paper contains a justification of the distinction between philosophic psychology, which understands soul as a substantial form of the human being, and dualistic philosophic psychology, which views soul as the subject of activities, or as incomplete substance. This distinction is then confirmed as confronted with the way Thomas Aquinas delimits the human being as imago Dei in his Summa Theologiae, by which means the way we understand this expression becomes more exact, and the importance of Thomas's dualistic terminology, which we encounter in his works, is emphasised at the same time.","PeriodicalId":30478,"journal":{"name":"HYBRIS Revista de Filosofia","volume":"146 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unitary and dualistic aspects of anthropology by Thomas Aquinas in relation to a human being as imago dei\",\"authors\":\"Petr Slováček\",\"doi\":\"10.18778/1689-4286.50.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present text deals with two layers of philosophic psychology/anthropology in the works of Thomas Aquinas and strives to examine the mutual relationships and interrelated meanings between these layers while paying particular attention to the biblical image of a human being as imago Dei. With respect to this aim, the paper contains a justification of the distinction between philosophic psychology, which understands soul as a substantial form of the human being, and dualistic philosophic psychology, which views soul as the subject of activities, or as incomplete substance. This distinction is then confirmed as confronted with the way Thomas Aquinas delimits the human being as imago Dei in his Summa Theologiae, by which means the way we understand this expression becomes more exact, and the importance of Thomas's dualistic terminology, which we encounter in his works, is emphasised at the same time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HYBRIS Revista de Filosofia\",\"volume\":\"146 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HYBRIS Revista de Filosofia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.50.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HYBRIS Revista de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.50.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将讨论托马斯·阿奎那作品中哲学心理学/人类学的两个层面,并努力研究这些层面之间的相互关系和相互关联的意义,同时特别关注圣经中人类作为上帝意象的形象。关于这一目的,本文对哲学心理学和二元论哲学心理学之间的区别进行了论证,哲学心理学认为灵魂是人的实体形式,而哲学心理学认为灵魂是活动的主体,或不完整的实体。这一区别在托马斯·阿奎那在他的《神学大全》中将人类界定为上帝的意象时得到了证实,这意味着我们理解这种表达的方式变得更加准确,同时,我们在他的作品中遇到的托马斯二元术语的重要性也得到了强调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unitary and dualistic aspects of anthropology by Thomas Aquinas in relation to a human being as imago dei
The present text deals with two layers of philosophic psychology/anthropology in the works of Thomas Aquinas and strives to examine the mutual relationships and interrelated meanings between these layers while paying particular attention to the biblical image of a human being as imago Dei. With respect to this aim, the paper contains a justification of the distinction between philosophic psychology, which understands soul as a substantial form of the human being, and dualistic philosophic psychology, which views soul as the subject of activities, or as incomplete substance. This distinction is then confirmed as confronted with the way Thomas Aquinas delimits the human being as imago Dei in his Summa Theologiae, by which means the way we understand this expression becomes more exact, and the importance of Thomas's dualistic terminology, which we encounter in his works, is emphasised at the same time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信