Nicholas Cowan, Eiko Nemitz, John T Walker, David Fowler, John J Finnigan, Helen N Webster, Peter Levy, Marsailidh Twigg, Sim Y Tang, Nuria Bachiller-Jareno, Philip Trembath, Robert P Kinnersley, Christine F Braban
{"title":"以英国为重点,回顾评估复杂地形上活性氮污染物沉积的方法。","authors":"Nicholas Cowan, Eiko Nemitz, John T Walker, David Fowler, John J Finnigan, Helen N Webster, Peter Levy, Marsailidh Twigg, Sim Y Tang, Nuria Bachiller-Jareno, Philip Trembath, Robert P Kinnersley, Christine F Braban","doi":"10.1039/d2ea00012a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review is a summary of the most up-to-date knowledge regarding assessment of atmospheric deposition of reactive nitrogen (<i>N</i> <sub>r</sub>) pollutants across complex terrain in the UK. Progress in the understanding of the mechanisms and quantification of <i>N</i> <sub>r</sub> deposition in areas of complex topography is slow, as no concerted attempts to measure the components of <i>N</i> <sub>r</sub> in complex terrain have been made in the last decade. This is likely due to the inherent complexity of the atmospheric processes and chemical interactions which contribute to deposition in these areas. More than 300 studies have been reviewed, and we have consulted with a panel of international experts which we assembled for that purpose. We report here on key findings and knowledge gaps identified regarding measurement and modelling techniques used to quantify deposition of <i>N</i> <sub>r</sub> across complex terrain in the UK, which depending on definition, may represent up to 60% of land coverage across Great Britain. The large body of peer reviewed papers, reports and other items reviewed in this study has highlighted both the strengths and weaknesses in the tools available to scientists, regulators and policy makers. This review highlights that there is no coherent global research effort to constrain the uncertainties in <i>N</i> <sub>r</sub> deposition over complex terrain, despite the clearly identified risk of <i>N</i> deposition to ecosystems and water quality. All evidence identified that enhanced <i>N</i> <sub>r</sub> deposition across complex terrain occurs, and magnitude of the enhancement is not known; however, there are major uncertainties particularly in the differences between modelled and measured wet deposition in complex terrain and representing accurate surface interactions in models. Using simplified estimates for <i>N</i> <sub>r</sub> deposition, based on current understanding of current measurement and model approaches, an enhancement across UK complex terrain in the range of a factor of 1.4-2.5 (<i>i.e</i>. 40-150% larger than current estimates) is likely over complex upland terrain. If at the upper limits of this, then significantly more ecosystems in the UK would be at a direct risk of degradation, and the potential for long-term non-remediable water quality issues increased.</p>","PeriodicalId":20333,"journal":{"name":"Powder Diffraction","volume":"20 1","pages":"829-851"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492904/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of methods for assessing deposition of reactive nitrogen pollutants across complex terrain with focus on the UK.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Cowan, Eiko Nemitz, John T Walker, David Fowler, John J Finnigan, Helen N Webster, Peter Levy, Marsailidh Twigg, Sim Y Tang, Nuria Bachiller-Jareno, Philip Trembath, Robert P Kinnersley, Christine F Braban\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/d2ea00012a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This review is a summary of the most up-to-date knowledge regarding assessment of atmospheric deposition of reactive nitrogen (<i>N</i> <sub>r</sub>) pollutants across complex terrain in the UK. Progress in the understanding of the mechanisms and quantification of <i>N</i> <sub>r</sub> deposition in areas of complex topography is slow, as no concerted attempts to measure the components of <i>N</i> <sub>r</sub> in complex terrain have been made in the last decade. This is likely due to the inherent complexity of the atmospheric processes and chemical interactions which contribute to deposition in these areas. More than 300 studies have been reviewed, and we have consulted with a panel of international experts which we assembled for that purpose. We report here on key findings and knowledge gaps identified regarding measurement and modelling techniques used to quantify deposition of <i>N</i> <sub>r</sub> across complex terrain in the UK, which depending on definition, may represent up to 60% of land coverage across Great Britain. The large body of peer reviewed papers, reports and other items reviewed in this study has highlighted both the strengths and weaknesses in the tools available to scientists, regulators and policy makers. This review highlights that there is no coherent global research effort to constrain the uncertainties in <i>N</i> <sub>r</sub> deposition over complex terrain, despite the clearly identified risk of <i>N</i> deposition to ecosystems and water quality. All evidence identified that enhanced <i>N</i> <sub>r</sub> deposition across complex terrain occurs, and magnitude of the enhancement is not known; however, there are major uncertainties particularly in the differences between modelled and measured wet deposition in complex terrain and representing accurate surface interactions in models. Using simplified estimates for <i>N</i> <sub>r</sub> deposition, based on current understanding of current measurement and model approaches, an enhancement across UK complex terrain in the range of a factor of 1.4-2.5 (<i>i.e</i>. 40-150% larger than current estimates) is likely over complex upland terrain. If at the upper limits of this, then significantly more ecosystems in the UK would be at a direct risk of degradation, and the potential for long-term non-remediable water quality issues increased.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Powder Diffraction\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"829-851\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492904/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Powder Diffraction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ea00012a\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Powder Diffraction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ea00012a","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本综述总结了有关英国复杂地形中活性氮(N r)污染物大气沉积评估的最新知识。由于在过去十年中没有对复杂地形中的 N r 成分进行过协调一致的测量,因此在了解复杂地形区域的 N r 沉积机理和量化方面进展缓慢。这可能是由于造成这些地区沉积的大气过程和化学相互作用本身的复杂性造成的。我们对 300 多项研究进行了审查,并为此咨询了我们组建的国际专家小组。根据不同的定义,英国复杂地形的氮沉积可能占整个大不列颠陆地覆盖面积的 60%,我们在此报告用于量化英国复杂地形氮沉积的测量和建模技术的主要发现和知识差距。本研究中审查的大量同行评审论文、报告和其他项目都强调了科学家、监管者和政策制定者可用工具的优点和缺点。本综述强调,尽管已明确氮沉积对生态系统和水质造成风险,但目前还没有协调一致的全球研究工作来限制复杂地形上氮沉积的不确定性。所有证据都表明,复杂地形上的 N r 沉积会增加,但增加的幅度尚不清楚;然而,存在着重大的不确定性,尤其是在复杂地形上模拟和测量的湿沉积之间的差异,以及在模型中准确反映地表相互作用方面。根据目前对当前测量和模型方法的理解,使用简化的 N r 沉积估算值,英国复杂地形上复杂高地的 N r 沉积可能会增加 1.4-2.5 倍(即比当前估算值多 40-150%)。如果达到该系数的上限,那么英国将有更多的生态系统面临退化的直接风险,长期不可修复的水质问题的可能性也将增加。
Review of methods for assessing deposition of reactive nitrogen pollutants across complex terrain with focus on the UK.
This review is a summary of the most up-to-date knowledge regarding assessment of atmospheric deposition of reactive nitrogen (Nr) pollutants across complex terrain in the UK. Progress in the understanding of the mechanisms and quantification of Nr deposition in areas of complex topography is slow, as no concerted attempts to measure the components of Nr in complex terrain have been made in the last decade. This is likely due to the inherent complexity of the atmospheric processes and chemical interactions which contribute to deposition in these areas. More than 300 studies have been reviewed, and we have consulted with a panel of international experts which we assembled for that purpose. We report here on key findings and knowledge gaps identified regarding measurement and modelling techniques used to quantify deposition of Nr across complex terrain in the UK, which depending on definition, may represent up to 60% of land coverage across Great Britain. The large body of peer reviewed papers, reports and other items reviewed in this study has highlighted both the strengths and weaknesses in the tools available to scientists, regulators and policy makers. This review highlights that there is no coherent global research effort to constrain the uncertainties in Nr deposition over complex terrain, despite the clearly identified risk of N deposition to ecosystems and water quality. All evidence identified that enhanced Nr deposition across complex terrain occurs, and magnitude of the enhancement is not known; however, there are major uncertainties particularly in the differences between modelled and measured wet deposition in complex terrain and representing accurate surface interactions in models. Using simplified estimates for Nr deposition, based on current understanding of current measurement and model approaches, an enhancement across UK complex terrain in the range of a factor of 1.4-2.5 (i.e. 40-150% larger than current estimates) is likely over complex upland terrain. If at the upper limits of this, then significantly more ecosystems in the UK would be at a direct risk of degradation, and the potential for long-term non-remediable water quality issues increased.
期刊介绍:
Powder Diffraction is a quarterly journal publishing articles, both experimental and theoretical, on the use of powder diffraction and related techniques for the characterization of crystalline materials. It is published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) for the International Centre for Diffraction Data (ICDD).