孤独症儿童介词反应的接受性习得和概化:两种过程的比较

Andrew L. Egel, Michael S. Shafer, Nancy A. Neef
{"title":"孤独症儿童介词反应的接受性习得和概化:两种过程的比较","authors":"Andrew L. Egel,&nbsp;Michael S. Shafer,&nbsp;Nancy A. Neef","doi":"10.1016/0270-4684(84)90006-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This investigation compared the effectiveness of two strategies with respect to the receptive acquisition and generalization of prepositional concepts in four autistic children. During “position self” training, the student was instructed to place himself in a specific relation to an object; “position object” training involved the student placing an object in a specific prepositional relation to another object. Data on the acquisition of the prepositional concepts showed that both strategies were effective, with prepositions trained in the “position object” condition acquired in slightly fewer sessions. For three of the students, specific programming was required before responding generalized to novel stimuli and/or across response topographies. Implications of these findings with respect to the training of generalized receptive comprehension of prepositions are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100080,"journal":{"name":"Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0270-4684(84)90006-5","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Receptive acquisition and generalization of prepositional responding in autistic children: A comparison of two procedures\",\"authors\":\"Andrew L. Egel,&nbsp;Michael S. Shafer,&nbsp;Nancy A. Neef\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0270-4684(84)90006-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This investigation compared the effectiveness of two strategies with respect to the receptive acquisition and generalization of prepositional concepts in four autistic children. During “position self” training, the student was instructed to place himself in a specific relation to an object; “position object” training involved the student placing an object in a specific prepositional relation to another object. Data on the acquisition of the prepositional concepts showed that both strategies were effective, with prepositions trained in the “position object” condition acquired in slightly fewer sessions. For three of the students, specific programming was required before responding generalized to novel stimuli and/or across response topographies. Implications of these findings with respect to the training of generalized receptive comprehension of prepositions are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0270-4684(84)90006-5\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0270468484900065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0270468484900065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

本研究比较了两种策略对四名自闭症儿童介词概念的接受性习得和概化的效果。在“定位自我”训练中,学生被指示将自己置于与对象的特定关系中;“定位对象”训练涉及学生将一个对象与另一个对象放在一个特定的介词关系中。关于介词概念习得的数据表明,这两种策略都是有效的,在“位置对象”条件下训练的介词习得次数略少。其中三名学生在对新刺激和/或跨反应地形作出广义反应之前,需要进行特定的编程。讨论了这些发现对介词的广义接受性理解训练的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Receptive acquisition and generalization of prepositional responding in autistic children: A comparison of two procedures

This investigation compared the effectiveness of two strategies with respect to the receptive acquisition and generalization of prepositional concepts in four autistic children. During “position self” training, the student was instructed to place himself in a specific relation to an object; “position object” training involved the student placing an object in a specific prepositional relation to another object. Data on the acquisition of the prepositional concepts showed that both strategies were effective, with prepositions trained in the “position object” condition acquired in slightly fewer sessions. For three of the students, specific programming was required before responding generalized to novel stimuli and/or across response topographies. Implications of these findings with respect to the training of generalized receptive comprehension of prepositions are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信