PrinType:通过指纹识别的文本输入

Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1145/3569491

Zongjian Liu, Jieling He, Jianjiang Feng, Jie Zhou

{"title":"PrinType:通过指纹识别的文本输入","authors":"Zongjian Liu, Jieling He, Jianjiang Feng, Jie Zhou","doi":"10.1145/3569491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A 12-person user study was conducted to evaluate the performance of different strategies. Our user evaluation showed that participants achieved an average of 29.56, 32.38, and 34.22 WPM with 0.79%, 0.20%, and 0.21% not corrected error rate in the three strategies. In addition, we provided a detailed analysis of various micro metrics to further understand user performance and technical characteristics. Overall, PrinType is favored by users for its usability, efficiency, and novelty.","PeriodicalId":20463,"journal":{"name":"Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol.","volume":"6 1","pages":"174:1-174:31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PrinType: Text Entry via Fingerprint Recognition\",\"authors\":\"Zongjian Liu, Jieling He, Jianjiang Feng, Jie Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3569491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A 12-person user study was conducted to evaluate the performance of different strategies. Our user evaluation showed that participants achieved an average of 29.56, 32.38, and 34.22 WPM with 0.79%, 0.20%, and 0.21% not corrected error rate in the three strategies. In addition, we provided a detailed analysis of various micro metrics to further understand user performance and technical characteristics. Overall, PrinType is favored by users for its usability, efficiency, and novelty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol.\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"174:1-174:31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3569491\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3569491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

我们进行了一项12人的用户研究，以评估不同策略的表现。我们的用户评价显示，参与者的平均得分为29.56、32.38和34.22 WPM，三种策略的未纠正错误率分别为0.79%、0.20%和0.21%。此外，我们还提供了各种微观指标的详细分析，以进一步了解用户性能和技术特征。总的来说，PrinType因其可用性、效率和新颖性而受到用户的青睐。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

PrinType: Text Entry via Fingerprint Recognition

A 12-person user study was conducted to evaluate the performance of different strategies. Our user evaluation showed that participants achieved an average of 29.56, 32.38, and 34.22 WPM with 0.79%, 0.20%, and 0.21% not corrected error rate in the three strategies. In addition, we provided a detailed analysis of various micro metrics to further understand user performance and technical characteristics. Overall, PrinType is favored by users for its usability, efficiency, and novelty.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol.

自引率

0.00%

发文量