日语和韩语词缀与助动词功能词头的比较研究

Hiroshi Aoyagi
{"title":"日语和韩语词缀与助动词功能词头的比较研究","authors":"Hiroshi Aoyagi","doi":"10.21820/23987073.2023.1.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is true that languages differ, but they can only be different as the universal principles and parameters allow. Professor Hiroshi Aoyagi is interested in linguistic curiosities and the universality of language. He and his research team in Japan are investigating the possibility that\n proto-Korean and proto-Japonic languages branched off from a common source thousands of years ago. Japanese and Korean have grammatical similarities but the typological relationship between the two is yet to be determined. Aoyagi is seeking to substantiate the hypothesis of a common origin\n for the two languages and, in doing so, will contribute to the typology of the three major languages in the Far East: Japanese, Korean and Ryukyuan. In his 1999 book, Shiro Hattori stated that Korean may have a kinship relation with Japanese (next to Ryukyuan) and the two languages must have\n split more than 4,000 years ago. Aoyagi believes that this conjecture, if tenable, accounts for the presence of double causatives, the absence of the benefactive auxiliary verbs and the absence of exclusive/adversity use of the passive morphemes in Korean and Ryukyuan. His studies involve\n an explanation of the core morpho-syntactic characteristics of the Japanese and Korean languages. A similarity between Japanese and Korean is that they are both head-final agglutinative languages. Aoyagi will conduct a comparative study of how functional morphemes are combined in Japanese\n and Korean. In his work, he is using the principles and parameters approach proposed by Noam Chomsky; namely Universal Grammar (UG).","PeriodicalId":88895,"journal":{"name":"IMPACT magazine","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study on verbal affixes and auxiliary verbs as functional heads in Japanese and Korean\",\"authors\":\"Hiroshi Aoyagi\",\"doi\":\"10.21820/23987073.2023.1.41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is true that languages differ, but they can only be different as the universal principles and parameters allow. Professor Hiroshi Aoyagi is interested in linguistic curiosities and the universality of language. He and his research team in Japan are investigating the possibility that\\n proto-Korean and proto-Japonic languages branched off from a common source thousands of years ago. Japanese and Korean have grammatical similarities but the typological relationship between the two is yet to be determined. Aoyagi is seeking to substantiate the hypothesis of a common origin\\n for the two languages and, in doing so, will contribute to the typology of the three major languages in the Far East: Japanese, Korean and Ryukyuan. In his 1999 book, Shiro Hattori stated that Korean may have a kinship relation with Japanese (next to Ryukyuan) and the two languages must have\\n split more than 4,000 years ago. Aoyagi believes that this conjecture, if tenable, accounts for the presence of double causatives, the absence of the benefactive auxiliary verbs and the absence of exclusive/adversity use of the passive morphemes in Korean and Ryukyuan. His studies involve\\n an explanation of the core morpho-syntactic characteristics of the Japanese and Korean languages. A similarity between Japanese and Korean is that they are both head-final agglutinative languages. Aoyagi will conduct a comparative study of how functional morphemes are combined in Japanese\\n and Korean. In his work, he is using the principles and parameters approach proposed by Noam Chomsky; namely Universal Grammar (UG).\",\"PeriodicalId\":88895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IMPACT magazine\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IMPACT magazine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21820/23987073.2023.1.41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IMPACT magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21820/23987073.2023.1.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

诚然,语言是不同的,但只有在普遍原则和参数允许的情况下,它们才能有所不同。青木浩教授对语言的好奇心和语言的普遍性很感兴趣。他和他在日本的研究小组正在调查一种可能性,即原始朝鲜语和原始日语在几千年前从一个共同的来源中分离出来。日语和韩语在语法上有相似之处,但两者之间的类型关系尚未确定。青木正试图证实这两种语言有共同起源的假设,这样做将有助于远东三种主要语言的类型学:日语、朝鲜语和琉球语。服部四郎在1999年出版的书中说:“韩国语和日语(琉球语旁边)可能有亲缘关系,这两种语言在4000多年前就已经分裂了。”Aoyagi认为,这一猜想如果成立的话,就可以解释韩语和琉球语中双重使役的存在、助动词的缺失以及被动语素的排除/逆境使用的缺失。他的研究包括对日语和韩语的核心词法特征的解释。日语和韩语的相似之处在于它们都是头尾粘合语言。青木将对日语和韩语的功能语素组合进行比较研究。在他的工作中,他使用了诺姆·乔姆斯基提出的原则和参数方法;即通用语法(UG)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study on verbal affixes and auxiliary verbs as functional heads in Japanese and Korean
It is true that languages differ, but they can only be different as the universal principles and parameters allow. Professor Hiroshi Aoyagi is interested in linguistic curiosities and the universality of language. He and his research team in Japan are investigating the possibility that proto-Korean and proto-Japonic languages branched off from a common source thousands of years ago. Japanese and Korean have grammatical similarities but the typological relationship between the two is yet to be determined. Aoyagi is seeking to substantiate the hypothesis of a common origin for the two languages and, in doing so, will contribute to the typology of the three major languages in the Far East: Japanese, Korean and Ryukyuan. In his 1999 book, Shiro Hattori stated that Korean may have a kinship relation with Japanese (next to Ryukyuan) and the two languages must have split more than 4,000 years ago. Aoyagi believes that this conjecture, if tenable, accounts for the presence of double causatives, the absence of the benefactive auxiliary verbs and the absence of exclusive/adversity use of the passive morphemes in Korean and Ryukyuan. His studies involve an explanation of the core morpho-syntactic characteristics of the Japanese and Korean languages. A similarity between Japanese and Korean is that they are both head-final agglutinative languages. Aoyagi will conduct a comparative study of how functional morphemes are combined in Japanese and Korean. In his work, he is using the principles and parameters approach proposed by Noam Chomsky; namely Universal Grammar (UG).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信