从临床心理学家的角度解读精神病理学

Kasomo Daniel
{"title":"从临床心理学家的角度解读精神病理学","authors":"Kasomo Daniel","doi":"10.5923/J.IJAP.20110101.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I wish to address the question of the nature of psychopathology. It might naturally be felt that we already know a great deal about psychopathology, and thus that such a paper would be primarily a review and discussion of the literature; I will argue, however, that the most fundamental form of the question concerning the nature of psychopa- thology is rarely posed in the literature, that it is prevented from being posed by presuppositions inherent in standard theo- retical approaches, and that, on those rare occasions when it does get addressed, it has received inadequate answers. Therefore, the paper will have more of the character of a conceptual explication and theoretical exegesis than it will of a review of the literature.","PeriodicalId":91505,"journal":{"name":"International journal of applied psychology","volume":"44 1","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Exegesis of Psychopathology a Clinical Psychologist Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Kasomo Daniel\",\"doi\":\"10.5923/J.IJAP.20110101.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper I wish to address the question of the nature of psychopathology. It might naturally be felt that we already know a great deal about psychopathology, and thus that such a paper would be primarily a review and discussion of the literature; I will argue, however, that the most fundamental form of the question concerning the nature of psychopa- thology is rarely posed in the literature, that it is prevented from being posed by presuppositions inherent in standard theo- retical approaches, and that, on those rare occasions when it does get addressed, it has received inadequate answers. Therefore, the paper will have more of the character of a conceptual explication and theoretical exegesis than it will of a review of the literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of applied psychology\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of applied psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5923/J.IJAP.20110101.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of applied psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5923/J.IJAP.20110101.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我想谈谈精神病理学的本质问题。人们可能会很自然地觉得,我们已经对精神病理学有了很大的了解,因此,这样一篇论文将主要是对文献的回顾和讨论;然而,我要说的是,关于精神病理学本质的问题的最基本形式很少在文献中提出,它被标准理论方法固有的预设所阻止,而且,在极少数情况下,当它得到解决时,它得到了不充分的答案。因此,这篇论文将有更多的概念解释和理论注释的特征,而不是对文献的回顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Exegesis of Psychopathology a Clinical Psychologist Perspective
In this paper I wish to address the question of the nature of psychopathology. It might naturally be felt that we already know a great deal about psychopathology, and thus that such a paper would be primarily a review and discussion of the literature; I will argue, however, that the most fundamental form of the question concerning the nature of psychopa- thology is rarely posed in the literature, that it is prevented from being posed by presuppositions inherent in standard theo- retical approaches, and that, on those rare occasions when it does get addressed, it has received inadequate answers. Therefore, the paper will have more of the character of a conceptual explication and theoretical exegesis than it will of a review of the literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信