Maṇḍanamiśra婆罗门教中的解放主义

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Paweł Sajdek
{"title":"Maṇḍanamiśra婆罗门教中的解放主义","authors":"Paweł Sajdek","doi":"10.24917/20841043.9.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issue of liberation is a recurrent theme in all schools of Indian classical thought. In case of \nadvaita-vedānta it is deeply rooted in ontology. The problem of ontological status of the world \nwas the bone of contention for two competing non‑dualist schools of vedānta — vivaraṇa and \nbhāmatī. Maṇḍana’s Brahmasiddhi can be regarded as an important source of inspiration for \nthe latter. The present paper is an analysis of Maṇḍana’s statements pertaining to the issue of \nmukti (or mokṣa) in contrast with those of Śankara, the exponent of advaita commonly (though \nerroneously) considered the creator and the most prominent representative of the school.","PeriodicalId":30403,"journal":{"name":"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The liberation doctrine in Brahmasiddhi of Maṇḍanamiśra\",\"authors\":\"Paweł Sajdek\",\"doi\":\"10.24917/20841043.9.1.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The issue of liberation is a recurrent theme in all schools of Indian classical thought. In case of \\nadvaita-vedānta it is deeply rooted in ontology. The problem of ontological status of the world \\nwas the bone of contention for two competing non‑dualist schools of vedānta — vivaraṇa and \\nbhāmatī. Maṇḍana’s Brahmasiddhi can be regarded as an important source of inspiration for \\nthe latter. The present paper is an analysis of Maṇḍana’s statements pertaining to the issue of \\nmukti (or mokṣa) in contrast with those of Śankara, the exponent of advaita commonly (though \\nerroneously) considered the creator and the most prominent representative of the school.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24917/20841043.9.1.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24917/20841043.9.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在印度古典思想的各个流派中,解放问题是一个反复出现的主题。以advaita-vedānta为例,它深深植根于本体。世界的本体论地位问题是两个相互竞争的非二元论学派vedānta - vivaraṇa和bhāmatī争论的焦点。Maṇḍana的Brahmasiddhi可以被视为后者的重要灵感来源。本文是对Maṇḍana关于mukti(或mokṣa)问题的陈述的分析,与Śankara的陈述形成对比,Śankara通常(尽管错误地)被认为是该学派的创造者和最突出的代表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The liberation doctrine in Brahmasiddhi of Maṇḍanamiśra
The issue of liberation is a recurrent theme in all schools of Indian classical thought. In case of advaita-vedānta it is deeply rooted in ontology. The problem of ontological status of the world was the bone of contention for two competing non‑dualist schools of vedānta — vivaraṇa and bhāmatī. Maṇḍana’s Brahmasiddhi can be regarded as an important source of inspiration for the latter. The present paper is an analysis of Maṇḍana’s statements pertaining to the issue of mukti (or mokṣa) in contrast with those of Śankara, the exponent of advaita commonly (though erroneously) considered the creator and the most prominent representative of the school.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Argument  Biannual Philosophical Journal
Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信