全球供应链中的选择性脱钩:越南服装厂社会问题的利益相关者突出视角

Trai Le
{"title":"全球供应链中的选择性脱钩:越南服装厂社会问题的利益相关者突出视角","authors":"Trai Le","doi":"10.1080/16258312.2022.2102935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Decoupling – a managerial strategy to buffer a company’s social sustainability policy from its daily business practices in order to minimise the impact on operations – has long been studied in sustainable supply chain management (SSCM). While the SSCM literature offers many examples of buyers’ decoupling, few publications focus on decoupling by suppliers, who are under pressure from buyers to adopt formal structures, i.e. social sustainability policies. There are even fewer studies exploring workers’ claims related to social issues in this regard. Our study, drawing on the concept of policy-practice decoupling, investigates how suppliers navigate the different expectations of buyers and factory-level workers to find ‘decouple-able’ policies when practising social sustainability. We apply the stakeholder salience theoretical lens to analyse 44 interviews from fieldwork in Vietnam to uncover who and what really counts for local supplier managers in selective decoupling. Along with enriching our understanding of decoupling done by local suppliers, our study uncovers the influence of workers on their managers in shaping and reshaping decoupling.","PeriodicalId":22004,"journal":{"name":"Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unpacking selective decoupling in global supply chains: a stakeholder salience perspective on social issues in Vietnam’s garment factories\",\"authors\":\"Trai Le\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16258312.2022.2102935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Decoupling – a managerial strategy to buffer a company’s social sustainability policy from its daily business practices in order to minimise the impact on operations – has long been studied in sustainable supply chain management (SSCM). While the SSCM literature offers many examples of buyers’ decoupling, few publications focus on decoupling by suppliers, who are under pressure from buyers to adopt formal structures, i.e. social sustainability policies. There are even fewer studies exploring workers’ claims related to social issues in this regard. Our study, drawing on the concept of policy-practice decoupling, investigates how suppliers navigate the different expectations of buyers and factory-level workers to find ‘decouple-able’ policies when practising social sustainability. We apply the stakeholder salience theoretical lens to analyse 44 interviews from fieldwork in Vietnam to uncover who and what really counts for local supplier managers in selective decoupling. Along with enriching our understanding of decoupling done by local suppliers, our study uncovers the influence of workers on their managers in shaping and reshaping decoupling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2022.2102935\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2022.2102935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

解耦-一种管理策略,以缓冲公司的社会可持续发展政策从其日常业务实践,以尽量减少对运营的影响-长期以来一直在可持续供应链管理(SSCM)研究。虽然SSCM文献提供了许多买家脱钩的例子,但很少有出版物关注供应商的脱钩,供应商在买家的压力下采取正式的结构,即社会可持续性政策。在这方面,探讨工人与社会问题相关的诉求的研究就更少了。我们的研究借鉴了政策-实践脱钩的概念,研究了供应商在实践社会可持续性时如何驾驭买家和工厂工人的不同期望,以找到“可解耦”的政策。我们运用利益相关者显著性理论视角分析了越南44个实地访谈,以揭示在选择性脱钩中,谁和什么对当地供应商经理真正重要。在丰富我们对本地供应商的脱钩理解的同时,我们的研究揭示了工人对其管理者在形成和重塑脱钩方面的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unpacking selective decoupling in global supply chains: a stakeholder salience perspective on social issues in Vietnam’s garment factories
ABSTRACT Decoupling – a managerial strategy to buffer a company’s social sustainability policy from its daily business practices in order to minimise the impact on operations – has long been studied in sustainable supply chain management (SSCM). While the SSCM literature offers many examples of buyers’ decoupling, few publications focus on decoupling by suppliers, who are under pressure from buyers to adopt formal structures, i.e. social sustainability policies. There are even fewer studies exploring workers’ claims related to social issues in this regard. Our study, drawing on the concept of policy-practice decoupling, investigates how suppliers navigate the different expectations of buyers and factory-level workers to find ‘decouple-able’ policies when practising social sustainability. We apply the stakeholder salience theoretical lens to analyse 44 interviews from fieldwork in Vietnam to uncover who and what really counts for local supplier managers in selective decoupling. Along with enriching our understanding of decoupling done by local suppliers, our study uncovers the influence of workers on their managers in shaping and reshaping decoupling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信