{"title":"Republican Imperialisms","authors":"Christina B. Carroll","doi":"10.3167/fpcs.2018.360308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the 1880s and 1890s, a wave of histories of colonial empire\nappeared in France. But even though they were produced by members of similar\nrepublican colonial advocacy groups, these accounts narrated the history\nof empire in contradictory ways. Some positioned “colonial empire” as an\nenterprise with ancient roots, while others treated modern colonization as\ndistinct. Some argued that French colonial empire was a unique enterprise in\nline with republican ideals, but others insisted that it was a European-wide\nproject that transcended domestic political questions. By tracing the differences\nbetween these accounts, this article highlights the flexibility that characterized\nlate nineteenth-century republican understandings of empire. It\nalso points to the ways republican advocates for colonial expansion during\nthis period looked both historically and comparatively to legitimize their\nvisions for empire’s future in France.","PeriodicalId":35271,"journal":{"name":"French Politics, Culture & Society","volume":"1720 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"French Politics, Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/fpcs.2018.360308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
In the 1880s and 1890s, a wave of histories of colonial empire
appeared in France. But even though they were produced by members of similar
republican colonial advocacy groups, these accounts narrated the history
of empire in contradictory ways. Some positioned “colonial empire” as an
enterprise with ancient roots, while others treated modern colonization as
distinct. Some argued that French colonial empire was a unique enterprise in
line with republican ideals, but others insisted that it was a European-wide
project that transcended domestic political questions. By tracing the differences
between these accounts, this article highlights the flexibility that characterized
late nineteenth-century republican understandings of empire. It
also points to the ways republican advocates for colonial expansion during
this period looked both historically and comparatively to legitimize their
visions for empire’s future in France.
期刊介绍:
French Politics, Culture & Society explores modern and contemporary France from the perspectives of the social sciences, history, and cultural analysis. It also examines France''s relationship to the larger world, especially Europe, the United States, and the former French Empire. The editors also welcome pieces on recent debates and events, as well as articles that explore the connections between French society and cultural expression of all sorts (such as art, film, literature, and popular culture). Issues devoted to a single theme appear from time to time. With refereed research articles, timely essays, and reviews of books in many disciplines, French Politics, Culture & Society provides a forum for learned opinion and the latest scholarship on France.