社会脆弱性的叙述。局内人对社会政策实践的批判性反思

Q3 Social Sciences
Wilma Numans, Juliette Boog, Tine Van Regenmortel, R. Schalk
{"title":"社会脆弱性的叙述。局内人对社会政策实践的批判性反思","authors":"Wilma Numans, Juliette Boog, Tine Van Regenmortel, R. Schalk","doi":"10.1921/swssr.v23i3.1837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite social policies’ aim to realize an inclusive society, social exclusion of vulnerable groups happens. We analyse the experiences of vulnerable persons with practices of implementation of social policies. The analysis of data of in-depth interviews brings to the fore critical notes of vulnerable persons’ interactions with social policy practitioners. This insider’s perspective provides insight in how they experience access to social rights. Respondents report feelings of intensified vulnerability, a confrontation with too much bureaucracy, and a range of insufficiencies in practitioners’ approaches. The bureaucratic contexts often fail to meet persons needs due to protocols and budget restrictions. In order to implement a more individualized approach practitioners need discretionary space in which they can apply moral-ethical considerations, and are responsive to personal requests. Based on the acknowledgment of the insider’s perspective and addressing the shortcomings of the social policy practice, practitioners can pave the way for more social justice.","PeriodicalId":53681,"journal":{"name":"Social Work and Social Sciences Review","volume":"94 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Narratives of societal vulnerability. An insider’s critical reflection on social policy practice\",\"authors\":\"Wilma Numans, Juliette Boog, Tine Van Regenmortel, R. Schalk\",\"doi\":\"10.1921/swssr.v23i3.1837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite social policies’ aim to realize an inclusive society, social exclusion of vulnerable groups happens. We analyse the experiences of vulnerable persons with practices of implementation of social policies. The analysis of data of in-depth interviews brings to the fore critical notes of vulnerable persons’ interactions with social policy practitioners. This insider’s perspective provides insight in how they experience access to social rights. Respondents report feelings of intensified vulnerability, a confrontation with too much bureaucracy, and a range of insufficiencies in practitioners’ approaches. The bureaucratic contexts often fail to meet persons needs due to protocols and budget restrictions. In order to implement a more individualized approach practitioners need discretionary space in which they can apply moral-ethical considerations, and are responsive to personal requests. Based on the acknowledgment of the insider’s perspective and addressing the shortcomings of the social policy practice, practitioners can pave the way for more social justice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Work and Social Sciences Review\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Work and Social Sciences Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v23i3.1837\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Work and Social Sciences Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v23i3.1837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管社会政策的目标是实现一个包容的社会,但弱势群体的社会排斥却在发生。我们分析弱势群体的经验与实施社会政策的做法。对深度访谈数据的分析,突出了弱势群体与社会政策实践者互动的关键注意事项。这个内部人士的观点提供了他们如何获得社会权利的见解。受访者报告说,他们感到更加脆弱,面对太多的官僚主义,以及从业人员方法的一系列不足。由于协议和预算限制,官僚环境往往不能满足人的需要。为了实施更加个性化的方法,从业者需要自由裁量的空间,在其中他们可以应用道德-伦理考虑,并对个人要求作出反应。在承认局内人视角的基础上,解决社会政策实践的不足,从业者可以为更多的社会正义铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Narratives of societal vulnerability. An insider’s critical reflection on social policy practice
Despite social policies’ aim to realize an inclusive society, social exclusion of vulnerable groups happens. We analyse the experiences of vulnerable persons with practices of implementation of social policies. The analysis of data of in-depth interviews brings to the fore critical notes of vulnerable persons’ interactions with social policy practitioners. This insider’s perspective provides insight in how they experience access to social rights. Respondents report feelings of intensified vulnerability, a confrontation with too much bureaucracy, and a range of insufficiencies in practitioners’ approaches. The bureaucratic contexts often fail to meet persons needs due to protocols and budget restrictions. In order to implement a more individualized approach practitioners need discretionary space in which they can apply moral-ethical considerations, and are responsive to personal requests. Based on the acknowledgment of the insider’s perspective and addressing the shortcomings of the social policy practice, practitioners can pave the way for more social justice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Work and Social Sciences Review
Social Work and Social Sciences Review Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信