浮动肘关节损伤的治疗

Jr-Yi Wang, Ying-Chao Chou, Po-Cheng Lee, Yi-Hsun Yu, W. Yeh, Chi-Chuan Wu
{"title":"浮动肘关节损伤的治疗","authors":"Jr-Yi Wang, Ying-Chao Chou, Po-Cheng Lee, Yi-Hsun Yu, W. Yeh, Chi-Chuan Wu","doi":"10.6492/FJMD.2015.0601.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A floating elbow injury (FEI, concomitant ipsilateral fractures of the humerus, ulna, and radius shafts) is rare and difficult to treat. The optimal methods for treating this complex injury have not been well defined. Materials and methods: Twenty-six adult patients with a FEI were treated between 2004 and 2010. Twenty patients were followed for at least one year and were included in this study. Each forearm fracture was treated with open reduction and plate fixation. Humeral fractures were treated with internal fixation using a plate or intramedullary nail. 6 patients received one stage operation and 14 patients were staged operation. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score was used to evaluate elbow function. Prognostic factors were studied according to injury severity and treatment methods. Results: Twenty patients (77%, 20/26) were followed for at least one year (average, 25.8 ± 10.2 month) and were included in this study. The rate of open forearm fractures (45%, 9/20) was higher than that of humeral fractures (30%, 6/20); moreover, 66.7% (10/15) of these open fractures were Gustilo type III open fractures. The union rates of the humerus, radius, and ulna were 95%, 90% and 85%, respectively. The average union times of the humerus, radius, and ulna were 17.7 ± 8.6, 25.9 ± 10, and 25.1 ± 10.8 weeks, respectively. The union time of the humerus was significantly shorter than that of the radius (p=0.008) and ulna (p=0.01). Satisfactory elbow function was observed in 13 patients (65%, 13/20). Eleven patients (55%, 11/20) had isolated or multiple nerve injuries. Radial nerve injury was most common (40%, 8/20). Recovery may be spontaneous in 62.5% of all radial nerve injury cases and 100% in patient with isolated radial nerve injury. In univariate analysis (Mann-Whitney U test), open fractures, vascular injury, nonunion, and deep infection were found to significantly associated with unsatisfactory elbow functions. Based on a Kruskal Wallis test, BPI or multiple nerve injuries was associated with significantly poorer surgical outcomes than no nerve injury and transient nerve palsy (p=0.01). Conclusions: A FEI is difficult to treat and only 65% of patients may achieve satisfactory elbow function. An unsatisfactory prognosis may be related to open fractures, BPI or multiple nerve injuries, vascular injury, nonunion, and deep infection. Radial nerve injury was most common (40%, 8/20). Recovery may be spontaneous in 62.5% of all radial nerve injury cases and 100% in patient with isolated radial nerve injury. Humeral fractures may heal faster than radial or ulnar fractures.","PeriodicalId":100551,"journal":{"name":"Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"65 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of Floating Elbow Injury\",\"authors\":\"Jr-Yi Wang, Ying-Chao Chou, Po-Cheng Lee, Yi-Hsun Yu, W. Yeh, Chi-Chuan Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.6492/FJMD.2015.0601.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: A floating elbow injury (FEI, concomitant ipsilateral fractures of the humerus, ulna, and radius shafts) is rare and difficult to treat. The optimal methods for treating this complex injury have not been well defined. Materials and methods: Twenty-six adult patients with a FEI were treated between 2004 and 2010. Twenty patients were followed for at least one year and were included in this study. Each forearm fracture was treated with open reduction and plate fixation. Humeral fractures were treated with internal fixation using a plate or intramedullary nail. 6 patients received one stage operation and 14 patients were staged operation. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score was used to evaluate elbow function. Prognostic factors were studied according to injury severity and treatment methods. Results: Twenty patients (77%, 20/26) were followed for at least one year (average, 25.8 ± 10.2 month) and were included in this study. The rate of open forearm fractures (45%, 9/20) was higher than that of humeral fractures (30%, 6/20); moreover, 66.7% (10/15) of these open fractures were Gustilo type III open fractures. The union rates of the humerus, radius, and ulna were 95%, 90% and 85%, respectively. The average union times of the humerus, radius, and ulna were 17.7 ± 8.6, 25.9 ± 10, and 25.1 ± 10.8 weeks, respectively. The union time of the humerus was significantly shorter than that of the radius (p=0.008) and ulna (p=0.01). Satisfactory elbow function was observed in 13 patients (65%, 13/20). Eleven patients (55%, 11/20) had isolated or multiple nerve injuries. Radial nerve injury was most common (40%, 8/20). Recovery may be spontaneous in 62.5% of all radial nerve injury cases and 100% in patient with isolated radial nerve injury. In univariate analysis (Mann-Whitney U test), open fractures, vascular injury, nonunion, and deep infection were found to significantly associated with unsatisfactory elbow functions. Based on a Kruskal Wallis test, BPI or multiple nerve injuries was associated with significantly poorer surgical outcomes than no nerve injury and transient nerve palsy (p=0.01). Conclusions: A FEI is difficult to treat and only 65% of patients may achieve satisfactory elbow function. An unsatisfactory prognosis may be related to open fractures, BPI or multiple nerve injuries, vascular injury, nonunion, and deep infection. Radial nerve injury was most common (40%, 8/20). Recovery may be spontaneous in 62.5% of all radial nerve injury cases and 100% in patient with isolated radial nerve injury. Humeral fractures may heal faster than radial or ulnar fractures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6492/FJMD.2015.0601.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6492/FJMD.2015.0601.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:漂浮肘关节损伤(FEI,伴随肱骨、尺骨和桡骨轴的同侧骨折)是罕见且难以治疗的。治疗这种复杂损伤的最佳方法尚未得到很好的定义。材料与方法:2004 - 2010年间,对26例成人FEI患者进行治疗。20例患者随访至少一年,纳入本研究。每例前臂骨折均行切开复位钢板固定。肱骨骨折采用钢板或髓内钉内固定治疗。一期手术6例,分期手术14例。使用Mayo肘关节功能评分评估肘关节功能。根据损伤严重程度及治疗方法,探讨影响预后的因素。结果:20例(77%,20/26)患者随访1年以上(平均25.8±10.2个月),纳入本研究。前臂开放性骨折发生率(45%,9/20)高于肱骨开放性骨折发生率(30%,6/20);66.7%(10/15)为Gustilo III型开放性骨折。肱骨、桡骨和尺骨愈合率分别为95%、90%和85%。肱骨、桡骨和尺骨的平均愈合时间分别为17.7±8.6周、25.9±10周和25.1±10.8周。肱骨愈合时间明显短于桡骨愈合时间(p=0.008)和尺骨愈合时间(p=0.01)。13例患者肘关节功能满意(65%,13/20)。11例患者(55%,11/20)有孤立或多发神经损伤。桡神经损伤最为常见(40%,8/20)。62.5%的桡神经损伤病例和100%的孤立性桡神经损伤患者可自行恢复。在单因素分析(Mann-Whitney U检验)中,发现开放性骨折、血管损伤、骨不连和深部感染与肘关节功能不理想显著相关。根据Kruskal Wallis试验,与无神经损伤和一过性神经麻痹相比,BPI或多发性神经损伤的手术结果明显较差(p=0.01)。结论:A - FEI治疗困难,只有65%的患者肘关节功能达到满意。预后不理想可能与开放性骨折、BPI或多发性神经损伤、血管损伤、骨不连和深部感染有关。桡神经损伤最为常见(40%,8/20)。62.5%的桡神经损伤病例和100%的孤立性桡神经损伤患者可自行恢复。肱骨骨折可能比桡骨或尺骨骨折愈合得快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment of Floating Elbow Injury
Background: A floating elbow injury (FEI, concomitant ipsilateral fractures of the humerus, ulna, and radius shafts) is rare and difficult to treat. The optimal methods for treating this complex injury have not been well defined. Materials and methods: Twenty-six adult patients with a FEI were treated between 2004 and 2010. Twenty patients were followed for at least one year and were included in this study. Each forearm fracture was treated with open reduction and plate fixation. Humeral fractures were treated with internal fixation using a plate or intramedullary nail. 6 patients received one stage operation and 14 patients were staged operation. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score was used to evaluate elbow function. Prognostic factors were studied according to injury severity and treatment methods. Results: Twenty patients (77%, 20/26) were followed for at least one year (average, 25.8 ± 10.2 month) and were included in this study. The rate of open forearm fractures (45%, 9/20) was higher than that of humeral fractures (30%, 6/20); moreover, 66.7% (10/15) of these open fractures were Gustilo type III open fractures. The union rates of the humerus, radius, and ulna were 95%, 90% and 85%, respectively. The average union times of the humerus, radius, and ulna were 17.7 ± 8.6, 25.9 ± 10, and 25.1 ± 10.8 weeks, respectively. The union time of the humerus was significantly shorter than that of the radius (p=0.008) and ulna (p=0.01). Satisfactory elbow function was observed in 13 patients (65%, 13/20). Eleven patients (55%, 11/20) had isolated or multiple nerve injuries. Radial nerve injury was most common (40%, 8/20). Recovery may be spontaneous in 62.5% of all radial nerve injury cases and 100% in patient with isolated radial nerve injury. In univariate analysis (Mann-Whitney U test), open fractures, vascular injury, nonunion, and deep infection were found to significantly associated with unsatisfactory elbow functions. Based on a Kruskal Wallis test, BPI or multiple nerve injuries was associated with significantly poorer surgical outcomes than no nerve injury and transient nerve palsy (p=0.01). Conclusions: A FEI is difficult to treat and only 65% of patients may achieve satisfactory elbow function. An unsatisfactory prognosis may be related to open fractures, BPI or multiple nerve injuries, vascular injury, nonunion, and deep infection. Radial nerve injury was most common (40%, 8/20). Recovery may be spontaneous in 62.5% of all radial nerve injury cases and 100% in patient with isolated radial nerve injury. Humeral fractures may heal faster than radial or ulnar fractures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信