韩国污水浓度限值再评价及比较分析

IF 0.6 Q4 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
W. Hwang, Joeun Lee, Dahye Kwon, Eun Han Kim, Moon-Hee Han
{"title":"韩国污水浓度限值再评价及比较分析","authors":"W. Hwang, Joeun Lee, Dahye Kwon, Eun Han Kim, Moon-Hee Han","doi":"10.14407/JRPR.2018.43.3.124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Results and Discussion: The relative ratios of the re-evaluated ECLs to the currently applied domestic standards differed depending on the radionuclide type, but it was clearly shown that, for tritium (3H) and radiocarbon (14C), which significantly affect radiological dose to the public during the normal operation of nuclear power plants, the re-evaluated ECLs were higher than the domestic standards. This implies that Korean standards are relatively conservative.","PeriodicalId":36088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Protection and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-evaluation of Korean Effluent Concentration Limits and Comparative Analysis\",\"authors\":\"W. Hwang, Joeun Lee, Dahye Kwon, Eun Han Kim, Moon-Hee Han\",\"doi\":\"10.14407/JRPR.2018.43.3.124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Results and Discussion: The relative ratios of the re-evaluated ECLs to the currently applied domestic standards differed depending on the radionuclide type, but it was clearly shown that, for tritium (3H) and radiocarbon (14C), which significantly affect radiological dose to the public during the normal operation of nuclear power plants, the re-evaluated ECLs were higher than the domestic standards. This implies that Korean standards are relatively conservative.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Radiation Protection and Research\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Radiation Protection and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14407/JRPR.2018.43.3.124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Protection and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14407/JRPR.2018.43.3.124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

结果与讨论:不同的放射性核素类型,重评ecl与国内现行标准的相对比值有所不同,但可以清楚地看到,对于核电站正常运行时对公众辐射剂量影响较大的氚(3H)和放射性碳(14C),重评ecl高于国内标准。这意味着韩国的标准相对保守。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Re-evaluation of Korean Effluent Concentration Limits and Comparative Analysis
Results and Discussion: The relative ratios of the re-evaluated ECLs to the currently applied domestic standards differed depending on the radionuclide type, but it was clearly shown that, for tritium (3H) and radiocarbon (14C), which significantly affect radiological dose to the public during the normal operation of nuclear power plants, the re-evaluated ECLs were higher than the domestic standards. This implies that Korean standards are relatively conservative.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
Journal of Radiation Protection and Research Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信