“繁简”:从隐喻到概念

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Elena P. Martynenko
{"title":"“繁简”:从隐喻到概念","authors":"Elena P. Martynenko","doi":"10.17223/22220836/47/8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The artistic culture of the 20th century is characterized by complex processes that have affected the aesthetics, philosophy of art and technology of creating works of art. The search for common patterns that unite different types of contemporary art is an urgent problem. The notion of “complex simplicity” is increasingly common in the cultural sphere as a generalized view of various artistic phenomena. The purpose of the article is to determine the conceptual status of “complex simplicity” and the specifics of its manifestations in the artistic culture of the 20th century. In the first half of the 20th century Prokofiev declared “new simplicity” as an alternative to the intentional complication of the musical language. Similar phenomena emerged in foreign musical culture: the anti-romantic orientation “Les Six”, the rational ideas of the “Second Viennese School”, the harmony and simplicity of neoclassicism. The fundamental difference of creative positions has been outlined: the desire for simplicity “in general” (as accessibility, primitivism) - and the desire for simplicity of the new quality, combined with the complexity of internal organization. In the painting the idea of a simple form was elevated to the level of a complex aesthetic concept - a new philosophy of color and form (Rayonism, Suprematism, etc.). The idea of “emptiness and simplicity” and the slogan “Less is more” (Ludwig Mies van der Rohe) dominated in architecture and interior design. The following factors actualized the interest in “complex simplicity”: 1) the complexity of the internal organization was an opportunity for the Creator not to fall into primitivism and simplification. So the masters separate themselves from the amateurism generated by the mass culture of the 20th century; 2) quality of simplicity allowed to protect the person from event and information oversaturation of modern life; 3) socio-cultural situation and artistic ideology of socialist realism has become an important factor in the domestic art. “Complex simplicity” in contemporary art is represented by two options: either an artistic text has a complex idea and content with simplicity of form and perception; or a simple concept is combined with a complex structure. This problem is actively manifested itself in the 20th century due to the increased attention to the communicative functions of culture and its texts. “Complex simplicity” implements the most important principles of postmodernism: it gives the opportunity to speak a professional and complex language in the “era of lost simplicity” (U. Eco), allows the recipient of any level of training to perceive the literary text as far as possible (pluralism of meanings). “Complex simplicity” can be considered as a property of the text of culture that characterizes its communicative functions. Despite the metaphorical nature of “complex simplicity”, it can become a full-fledged concept due to the specificity of the terminological apparatus of cultural science","PeriodicalId":41702,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Kulturologiya i Iskusstvovedenie-Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Complex simplicity”: from metaphor to concept\",\"authors\":\"Elena P. Martynenko\",\"doi\":\"10.17223/22220836/47/8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The artistic culture of the 20th century is characterized by complex processes that have affected the aesthetics, philosophy of art and technology of creating works of art. The search for common patterns that unite different types of contemporary art is an urgent problem. The notion of “complex simplicity” is increasingly common in the cultural sphere as a generalized view of various artistic phenomena. The purpose of the article is to determine the conceptual status of “complex simplicity” and the specifics of its manifestations in the artistic culture of the 20th century. In the first half of the 20th century Prokofiev declared “new simplicity” as an alternative to the intentional complication of the musical language. Similar phenomena emerged in foreign musical culture: the anti-romantic orientation “Les Six”, the rational ideas of the “Second Viennese School”, the harmony and simplicity of neoclassicism. The fundamental difference of creative positions has been outlined: the desire for simplicity “in general” (as accessibility, primitivism) - and the desire for simplicity of the new quality, combined with the complexity of internal organization. In the painting the idea of a simple form was elevated to the level of a complex aesthetic concept - a new philosophy of color and form (Rayonism, Suprematism, etc.). The idea of “emptiness and simplicity” and the slogan “Less is more” (Ludwig Mies van der Rohe) dominated in architecture and interior design. The following factors actualized the interest in “complex simplicity”: 1) the complexity of the internal organization was an opportunity for the Creator not to fall into primitivism and simplification. So the masters separate themselves from the amateurism generated by the mass culture of the 20th century; 2) quality of simplicity allowed to protect the person from event and information oversaturation of modern life; 3) socio-cultural situation and artistic ideology of socialist realism has become an important factor in the domestic art. “Complex simplicity” in contemporary art is represented by two options: either an artistic text has a complex idea and content with simplicity of form and perception; or a simple concept is combined with a complex structure. This problem is actively manifested itself in the 20th century due to the increased attention to the communicative functions of culture and its texts. “Complex simplicity” implements the most important principles of postmodernism: it gives the opportunity to speak a professional and complex language in the “era of lost simplicity” (U. Eco), allows the recipient of any level of training to perceive the literary text as far as possible (pluralism of meanings). “Complex simplicity” can be considered as a property of the text of culture that characterizes its communicative functions. Despite the metaphorical nature of “complex simplicity”, it can become a full-fledged concept due to the specificity of the terminological apparatus of cultural science\",\"PeriodicalId\":41702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Kulturologiya i Iskusstvovedenie-Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Kulturologiya i Iskusstvovedenie-Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17223/22220836/47/8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Kulturologiya i Iskusstvovedenie-Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/22220836/47/8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

20世纪的艺术文化以复杂的过程为特征,这些过程影响了艺术作品的美学、艺术哲学和创作技术。寻找统一不同类型当代艺术的共同模式是一个紧迫的问题。作为对各种艺术现象的概括观点,“复简”的概念在文化界越来越普遍。本文的目的是确定“复简”在20世纪艺术文化中的概念地位及其具体表现形式。在20世纪上半叶,普罗科菲耶夫宣布“新简单”作为音乐语言故意复杂化的替代方案。在国外音乐文化中也出现了类似的现象:反浪漫主义的“Les Six”,“第二维也纳学派”的理性思想,新古典主义的和谐与简单。创造性立场的根本区别已经被概述:对“一般”的简单的渴望(作为可访问性,原始主义)-和对新品质的简单的渴望,结合内部组织的复杂性。在这幅画中,简单形式的概念被提升到复杂美学概念的层次——一种新的色彩和形式哲学(人造光主义、至上主义等)。“空虚和简单”的理念和“少即是多”的口号(路德维希·密斯·凡·德罗)在建筑和室内设计中占主导地位。以下因素实现了对“复杂的简单性”的兴趣:1)内部组织的复杂性是造物主不陷入原始主义和简化的机会。因此,大师们将自己与20世纪大众文化所产生的业余主义区分开来;2)简单的品质,使人们免受现代生活中事件和信息过度饱和的影响;社会主义现实主义的社会文化情境和艺术意识形态成为国内艺术的重要因素。当代艺术中的“繁简”表现为两种选择:一种是艺术文本的思想和内容复杂,形式和感知简单;或者一个简单的概念与一个复杂的结构相结合。这一问题在20世纪由于对文化及其文本的交际功能的日益重视而积极地表现出来。“复杂的简单”实现了后现代主义最重要的原则:它提供了在“失去简单的时代”(U. Eco)说专业和复杂语言的机会,允许任何水平的训练接受者尽可能地感知文学文本(意义的多元主义)。“繁简”是文化文本的一种属性,是其交际功能的特征。尽管“复杂的简单性”具有隐喻性质,但由于文化科学术语装置的特殊性,它可以成为一个成熟的概念
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Complex simplicity”: from metaphor to concept
The artistic culture of the 20th century is characterized by complex processes that have affected the aesthetics, philosophy of art and technology of creating works of art. The search for common patterns that unite different types of contemporary art is an urgent problem. The notion of “complex simplicity” is increasingly common in the cultural sphere as a generalized view of various artistic phenomena. The purpose of the article is to determine the conceptual status of “complex simplicity” and the specifics of its manifestations in the artistic culture of the 20th century. In the first half of the 20th century Prokofiev declared “new simplicity” as an alternative to the intentional complication of the musical language. Similar phenomena emerged in foreign musical culture: the anti-romantic orientation “Les Six”, the rational ideas of the “Second Viennese School”, the harmony and simplicity of neoclassicism. The fundamental difference of creative positions has been outlined: the desire for simplicity “in general” (as accessibility, primitivism) - and the desire for simplicity of the new quality, combined with the complexity of internal organization. In the painting the idea of a simple form was elevated to the level of a complex aesthetic concept - a new philosophy of color and form (Rayonism, Suprematism, etc.). The idea of “emptiness and simplicity” and the slogan “Less is more” (Ludwig Mies van der Rohe) dominated in architecture and interior design. The following factors actualized the interest in “complex simplicity”: 1) the complexity of the internal organization was an opportunity for the Creator not to fall into primitivism and simplification. So the masters separate themselves from the amateurism generated by the mass culture of the 20th century; 2) quality of simplicity allowed to protect the person from event and information oversaturation of modern life; 3) socio-cultural situation and artistic ideology of socialist realism has become an important factor in the domestic art. “Complex simplicity” in contemporary art is represented by two options: either an artistic text has a complex idea and content with simplicity of form and perception; or a simple concept is combined with a complex structure. This problem is actively manifested itself in the 20th century due to the increased attention to the communicative functions of culture and its texts. “Complex simplicity” implements the most important principles of postmodernism: it gives the opportunity to speak a professional and complex language in the “era of lost simplicity” (U. Eco), allows the recipient of any level of training to perceive the literary text as far as possible (pluralism of meanings). “Complex simplicity” can be considered as a property of the text of culture that characterizes its communicative functions. Despite the metaphorical nature of “complex simplicity”, it can become a full-fledged concept due to the specificity of the terminological apparatus of cultural science
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信