捷克共和国和斯洛伐克共和国确定森林林分轮作期方法的比较

IF 1.1 Q3 FORESTRY
Michaela Korená Hillayová, K. Holušová, Klára Báliková, J. Holécy
{"title":"捷克共和国和斯洛伐克共和国确定森林林分轮作期方法的比较","authors":"Michaela Korená Hillayová, K. Holušová, Klára Báliková, J. Holécy","doi":"10.17221/107/2022-jfs","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The exact determination of the rotation period is still a current and important essential issue of forestry. It attracts the attention of forest economists, managers and owners worldwide, not only of forest economists but also of forest managers. The rotation period is defined by physical, technical or financial parameters of forest management. Therefore, it is necessary to distinguish between the biological and the economic optimal rotation period. A fundamental challenge in forest management is the need for appropriate determination of the rotation period. The primary interest of our research was to compare the effective legislation for the determination of the rotation period in the Czech Republic and in the Slovak Republic. Scientific methods such as document analysis and questionnaire survey were applied. The results of the legislation analysis and other related documents were compared with the expert opinions of the relevant stakeholders. Those who affect the decision process related to the problem and those where are “affected” by the problem were involved in the study. Results show that respondents do not agree with the regulation of rotation period according to effective law. Moreover, they consider it as not usable as the conditions in forest ecosystems have changed recently, which is not considered in the legislation.","PeriodicalId":16011,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forest science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the approach to determination of the rotation period of forest stands in the Czech Republic and in the Slovak Republic\",\"authors\":\"Michaela Korená Hillayová, K. Holušová, Klára Báliková, J. Holécy\",\"doi\":\"10.17221/107/2022-jfs\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The exact determination of the rotation period is still a current and important essential issue of forestry. It attracts the attention of forest economists, managers and owners worldwide, not only of forest economists but also of forest managers. The rotation period is defined by physical, technical or financial parameters of forest management. Therefore, it is necessary to distinguish between the biological and the economic optimal rotation period. A fundamental challenge in forest management is the need for appropriate determination of the rotation period. The primary interest of our research was to compare the effective legislation for the determination of the rotation period in the Czech Republic and in the Slovak Republic. Scientific methods such as document analysis and questionnaire survey were applied. The results of the legislation analysis and other related documents were compared with the expert opinions of the relevant stakeholders. Those who affect the decision process related to the problem and those where are “affected” by the problem were involved in the study. Results show that respondents do not agree with the regulation of rotation period according to effective law. Moreover, they consider it as not usable as the conditions in forest ecosystems have changed recently, which is not considered in the legislation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of forest science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of forest science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17221/107/2022-jfs\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forest science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17221/107/2022-jfs","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

轮作期的确切确定仍然是当前林业的一个重要的基本问题。它引起了全世界森林经济学家、管理者和所有者的注意,不仅是森林经济学家,而且是森林管理者。轮调期由森林管理的物理、技术或财务参数确定。因此,有必要区分生物和经济最优轮作期。森林管理的一个基本挑战是需要适当地确定轮作期。我们研究的主要兴趣是比较捷克共和国和斯洛伐克共和国确定轮换期的有效立法。采用文献分析、问卷调查等科学方法。将立法分析和其他相关文件的结果与相关利益相关者的专家意见进行比较。那些影响与问题相关的决策过程的人和那些被问题“影响”的人都参与了这项研究。结果显示,受访者不同意根据有效法律规定轮换期。此外,他们认为,由于森林生态系统的条件最近发生了变化,因此无法使用,这一点在立法中没有考虑到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the approach to determination of the rotation period of forest stands in the Czech Republic and in the Slovak Republic
The exact determination of the rotation period is still a current and important essential issue of forestry. It attracts the attention of forest economists, managers and owners worldwide, not only of forest economists but also of forest managers. The rotation period is defined by physical, technical or financial parameters of forest management. Therefore, it is necessary to distinguish between the biological and the economic optimal rotation period. A fundamental challenge in forest management is the need for appropriate determination of the rotation period. The primary interest of our research was to compare the effective legislation for the determination of the rotation period in the Czech Republic and in the Slovak Republic. Scientific methods such as document analysis and questionnaire survey were applied. The results of the legislation analysis and other related documents were compared with the expert opinions of the relevant stakeholders. Those who affect the decision process related to the problem and those where are “affected” by the problem were involved in the study. Results show that respondents do not agree with the regulation of rotation period according to effective law. Moreover, they consider it as not usable as the conditions in forest ecosystems have changed recently, which is not considered in the legislation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
48
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Original results of basic and applied research from all fields of forestry related to European forest ecosystems and their functions including those in the landscape and wood production chain are published in original scientific papers, short communications and review articles. Papers are published in English
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信