{"title":"用范艾伦探针模拟等离子体环境下磁声波的全球分布","authors":"Kyung‐Chan Kim","doi":"10.5140/jass.2022.39.1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is suggested that magnetosonic waves (also known as equatorial noise) can\n scatter radiation belt electrons in the Earth’s magnetosphere. Therefore, it is\n important to understand the global distribution of these waves between the proton\n cyclotron frequency and the lower hybrid resonance frequency. In this study, we\n developed an empirical model for estimating the global distribution of magnetosonic wave\n amplitudes and wave normal angles. The model is based on the entire mission period\n (approximately 2012–2019) of observations of Van Allen Probes A and B as a function of\n the distance from the Earth (denoted by L*), magnetic local time (MLT), magnetic\n latitude (λ), and geomagnetic activity (denoted by the Kp index). In previous studies\n the wave distribution inside and outside the plasmasphere were separately investigated\n and modeled. Our model, on the other hand, identifies the wave distribution along with\n the ambient plasma environment—defined by the ratio of the plasma frequency (fpe) to the\n electron cyclotron frequency (fce)—without separately determining the wave distribution\n according to the plasmapause location. The model results show that, as Kp increases, the\n dayside wave amplitude in the equatorial region intensifies. It thereby propagates the\n intense region towards the wider MLT and inward to L* < 4. In contrast, the fpe/fce\n ratio decreases with increasing Kp for all regions. Nevertheless, the decreasing aspect\n differs between regions above and below L* = 4. This finding implies that the particle\n energy and pitch angle that magnetosonic waves can effectively scatter vary depending on\n the locations and geomagnetic activity. Our model agrees with the statistically observed\n wave distribution and ambient plasma environment with a coefficient of determination of\n > 0.9. The model is valid in all MLTs, 2 ≤ L* < 6, |λ| < 20°, and Kp ≤ 6.\n","PeriodicalId":44366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical Modeling of the Global Distribution of Magnetosonic Waves with Ambient\\n Plasma Environment using Van Allen Probes\",\"authors\":\"Kyung‐Chan Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.5140/jass.2022.39.1.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is suggested that magnetosonic waves (also known as equatorial noise) can\\n scatter radiation belt electrons in the Earth’s magnetosphere. Therefore, it is\\n important to understand the global distribution of these waves between the proton\\n cyclotron frequency and the lower hybrid resonance frequency. In this study, we\\n developed an empirical model for estimating the global distribution of magnetosonic wave\\n amplitudes and wave normal angles. The model is based on the entire mission period\\n (approximately 2012–2019) of observations of Van Allen Probes A and B as a function of\\n the distance from the Earth (denoted by L*), magnetic local time (MLT), magnetic\\n latitude (λ), and geomagnetic activity (denoted by the Kp index). In previous studies\\n the wave distribution inside and outside the plasmasphere were separately investigated\\n and modeled. Our model, on the other hand, identifies the wave distribution along with\\n the ambient plasma environment—defined by the ratio of the plasma frequency (fpe) to the\\n electron cyclotron frequency (fce)—without separately determining the wave distribution\\n according to the plasmapause location. The model results show that, as Kp increases, the\\n dayside wave amplitude in the equatorial region intensifies. It thereby propagates the\\n intense region towards the wider MLT and inward to L* < 4. In contrast, the fpe/fce\\n ratio decreases with increasing Kp for all regions. Nevertheless, the decreasing aspect\\n differs between regions above and below L* = 4. This finding implies that the particle\\n energy and pitch angle that magnetosonic waves can effectively scatter vary depending on\\n the locations and geomagnetic activity. Our model agrees with the statistically observed\\n wave distribution and ambient plasma environment with a coefficient of determination of\\n > 0.9. The model is valid in all MLTs, 2 ≤ L* < 6, |λ| < 20°, and Kp ≤ 6.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":44366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5140/jass.2022.39.1.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5140/jass.2022.39.1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Empirical Modeling of the Global Distribution of Magnetosonic Waves with Ambient
Plasma Environment using Van Allen Probes
It is suggested that magnetosonic waves (also known as equatorial noise) can
scatter radiation belt electrons in the Earth’s magnetosphere. Therefore, it is
important to understand the global distribution of these waves between the proton
cyclotron frequency and the lower hybrid resonance frequency. In this study, we
developed an empirical model for estimating the global distribution of magnetosonic wave
amplitudes and wave normal angles. The model is based on the entire mission period
(approximately 2012–2019) of observations of Van Allen Probes A and B as a function of
the distance from the Earth (denoted by L*), magnetic local time (MLT), magnetic
latitude (λ), and geomagnetic activity (denoted by the Kp index). In previous studies
the wave distribution inside and outside the plasmasphere were separately investigated
and modeled. Our model, on the other hand, identifies the wave distribution along with
the ambient plasma environment—defined by the ratio of the plasma frequency (fpe) to the
electron cyclotron frequency (fce)—without separately determining the wave distribution
according to the plasmapause location. The model results show that, as Kp increases, the
dayside wave amplitude in the equatorial region intensifies. It thereby propagates the
intense region towards the wider MLT and inward to L* < 4. In contrast, the fpe/fce
ratio decreases with increasing Kp for all regions. Nevertheless, the decreasing aspect
differs between regions above and below L* = 4. This finding implies that the particle
energy and pitch angle that magnetosonic waves can effectively scatter vary depending on
the locations and geomagnetic activity. Our model agrees with the statistically observed
wave distribution and ambient plasma environment with a coefficient of determination of
> 0.9. The model is valid in all MLTs, 2 ≤ L* < 6, |λ| < 20°, and Kp ≤ 6.
期刊介绍:
JASS aims for the promotion of global awareness and understanding of space science and related applications. Unlike other journals that focus either on space science or on space technologies, it intends to bridge the two communities of space science and technologies, by providing opportunities to exchange ideas and viewpoints in a single journal. Topics suitable for publication in JASS include researches in the following fields: space astronomy, solar physics, magnetospheric and ionospheric physics, cosmic ray, space weather, and planetary sciences; space instrumentation, satellite dynamics, geodesy, spacecraft control, and spacecraft navigation. However, the topics covered by JASS are not restricted to those mentioned above as the journal also encourages submission of research results in all other branches related to space science and technologies. Even though JASS was established on the heritage and achievements of the Korean space science community, it is now open to the worldwide community, while maintaining a high standard as a leading international journal. Hence, it solicits papers from the international community with a vision of global collaboration in the fields of space science and technologies.