具有有限回滚事件的乐观并行模拟的性能分析

V. Cortellessa, G. Iazeolla
{"title":"具有有限回滚事件的乐观并行模拟的性能分析","authors":"V. Cortellessa,&nbsp;G. Iazeolla","doi":"10.1016/S0928-4869(99)00011-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using the parallel simulation approach is not always the best choice. There are situations in which the sequential approach works better, in terms of simulation effectiveness.</p><p>Indeed, the optimistic parallel simulation time consists of two basic components: the forward execution time, and the rollback mechanism time-overhead. It is convenient to parallelize a simulation until the latter component is not predominant with respect to the former one.</p><p>The breakeven point depends on the nature of the model to simulate, on the characteristics of the simulation platform, and on the choice of tuning parameters such as the number of processors and the checkpoint interval.</p><p>This paper deals with an evaluation of the performances of the sequential and parallel approach, in case the optimistic parallel method is used. An analytical model is introduced to study the sensitivity of the parallel simulation effectiveness to the forward event time, in case each event is rolled back no more than once.</p><p>The model is first experimentally validated and then used to determine the breakeven point between the parallel and sequential approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101162,"journal":{"name":"Simulation Practice and Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0928-4869(99)00011-7","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance analysis of optimistic parallel simulations with limited rolled back events\",\"authors\":\"V. Cortellessa,&nbsp;G. Iazeolla\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0928-4869(99)00011-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Using the parallel simulation approach is not always the best choice. There are situations in which the sequential approach works better, in terms of simulation effectiveness.</p><p>Indeed, the optimistic parallel simulation time consists of two basic components: the forward execution time, and the rollback mechanism time-overhead. It is convenient to parallelize a simulation until the latter component is not predominant with respect to the former one.</p><p>The breakeven point depends on the nature of the model to simulate, on the characteristics of the simulation platform, and on the choice of tuning parameters such as the number of processors and the checkpoint interval.</p><p>This paper deals with an evaluation of the performances of the sequential and parallel approach, in case the optimistic parallel method is used. An analytical model is introduced to study the sensitivity of the parallel simulation effectiveness to the forward event time, in case each event is rolled back no more than once.</p><p>The model is first experimentally validated and then used to determine the breakeven point between the parallel and sequential approach.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Simulation Practice and Theory\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0928-4869(99)00011-7\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Simulation Practice and Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928486999000117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation Practice and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928486999000117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

使用并行仿真方法并不总是最好的选择。在某些情况下,顺序方法在模拟效果方面效果更好。实际上,乐观并行模拟时间由两个基本组件组成:前向执行时间和回滚机制时间开销。在后一个组件相对于前一个组件不占优势之前,将模拟并行化是很方便的。盈亏平衡点取决于要模拟的模型的性质、仿真平台的特性以及调优参数的选择,如处理器数量和检查点间隔。本文讨论了在采用乐观并行方法的情况下,顺序并行方法的性能评价。引入解析模型,研究了在每个事件回滚不超过一次的情况下,并行仿真效果对前向事件时间的敏感性。该模型首先经过实验验证,然后用于确定并行和顺序方法之间的盈亏平衡点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance analysis of optimistic parallel simulations with limited rolled back events

Using the parallel simulation approach is not always the best choice. There are situations in which the sequential approach works better, in terms of simulation effectiveness.

Indeed, the optimistic parallel simulation time consists of two basic components: the forward execution time, and the rollback mechanism time-overhead. It is convenient to parallelize a simulation until the latter component is not predominant with respect to the former one.

The breakeven point depends on the nature of the model to simulate, on the characteristics of the simulation platform, and on the choice of tuning parameters such as the number of processors and the checkpoint interval.

This paper deals with an evaluation of the performances of the sequential and parallel approach, in case the optimistic parallel method is used. An analytical model is introduced to study the sensitivity of the parallel simulation effectiveness to the forward event time, in case each event is rolled back no more than once.

The model is first experimentally validated and then used to determine the breakeven point between the parallel and sequential approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信