{"title":"青铜时代早期陶瓷的分类和语境分析:菲洛波洛村(菲利库迪群岛)的F小屋","authors":"M. Martinelli, C. Speciale","doi":"10.6092/ISSN.1974-7985/7591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The beginning of the Bronze Age in the Aeolian islands is marked by the Capo Graziano facies. The village of Filo Braccio represents the oldest phase of occupation of the archipelago in the Bronze Age. The settlement of Filo Braccio in Filicudi (Aeolian Islands) was the subject of archaeological investigations since 1959 (Bernabo Brea, Cavalier 1991a) and then resumed in 2009 (Martinelli et alii 2010) and in 2013. Several huts, named A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, L were investigated. They are groups of oval-shaped huts with attached open-air spaces for agricultural and work activities. Three households were identified: A-B-C; F-H; D-G-I-L. The analysis of the hut F represents an analytical study of the nucleus of a household of this complex settlement, inhabited for about five hundred years, during which it can be supposed the succession of at least ten generations. Here the authors decided to edit part of the archaeological excavation on the F hut, to expose pottery chronotypology and deepen the study of the Capo Graziano facies. The four horizons that Bernabo Brea claimed in one of his papers (Bernabo Brea 1982, pp. 12-13) expressed the need for a further scanning within the facies and provided useful ideas for its development. This higher focus on the chronological sequence is today possible thanks to the data that emerged from the recent excavations on the islands. The sequence of Capo Graziano facies in the Aeolian Islands presented by Luigi Bernabo Brea was based mainly on two typological elements: decoration and profile of the bowls. The absence of decoration in the most complex schemes is common in the site of Filo Braccio where, however, some drawings related to the sea, zigzag and boats rarely occur, the latter almost exclusively represented by a unique cup with marine scene. In the other sites of the Aeolian archipelago, the decorative motifs are comparable with each other and fall in the style that will become dominant in the final stage, when the villages shelter on high peaks. The first consideration that has emerged since the resumption of the investigation in the village, is that it was the island of Filicudi the first place to have “landed” the Capo Graziano people. Even considering the other settlements in the archipelago known so far and the distinctive characteristic changes of this facies from an island to another, no other settlement similar to Filo Braccio is known. The location on the coast, the long duration of the occupation (Martinelli et alii 2010; Martinelli 2016) from 2300 to 1700 BC, the absence of decoration in the typical style of pottery, the hut distribution within the site, all of this makes it a settlement in its own right. The hut F, whose internal chronological probably covers a span of about 150 years, is a significant case study: the three stages of life of the structure and pottery types have been compared both vertically in the internal stratigraphy, both horizontally (distribution areas) and with the materials of the structures A, B, C, D, E investigated in 1959. From a historical perspective, Hut F may be located in the early stages of occupation of the village and at an early stage of the culture of Capo Graziano, definitely parallelizable with the phases of the D and E huts, partly with the structures A, B and C and also with the funeral caves of Montagnola. For what to concern the contexts outside of Filicudi, some comparisons are possible with the necropolis of Diana in Lipari, with the village of San Vincenzo in Stromboli and with the Villaggio dei Cipressi in Milazzo. The hut F was inhabited during two main phases: the oldest one (phase 1) and the latest one (phase 2). After the collapse, the area of the structure was still used but no longer as dwelling (phase 3). Between phase 1 and 2 there are differences in the structural elements and in the use of space. For pottery types, there were two main shape indicators: the bowl and the jar. The jars are widespread in all the phases of the hut and in all the Aeolian sites of Capo Graziano facies. Some features indicate the differences between phases: \n- The rounded bowls (type 4) are present at all stages, but both 4A and 4B prevail in the phases 1-2 - The careened bowls (type 5) are present at all stages but it is possible to reconstruct an evolution that leads from the prevalence of type 5A in the phase 1 to the one of the type 5B (pronounced hull and throat) in steps 2-3 \n-The pedestal vase (type 12), although represented in all phases, is present to a lesser extent in the phase 1. \n-The incised decorative motifs are rare and consist of lines in a zigzag pattern somewhat irregular, but the boat depiction appears since the phase 1. \nWe can finally show some correlation elements with other cultural and geographic sites: \n- The presence of the pedestal vase (a local production) is widespread in the Sicilian culture of Malpasso-Chiusazza at the end of the Copper Age. \n- The presence during phase 3 of a “sway-backed” handle, that recalls the Messina-Ricadi facies in the Strait of Messina. \n- The local manufacture of pithoi, exported to Milazzo and Tindari. \nEssential part of the work was the analysis of the pottery materials for areal distribution, integrated as much as possible with the functional analysis linked to the shapes. The results will in future be crossed with the data obtained from the analysis of other classes of materials and with the other huts of the village still being studied, for an overall functional reading. It is important to note that throughout the settlement, as in the case of the hut F, there are no traces of violent destruction or sudden abandonment or fire. In addition, the large amount of materials recorded, especially in the US 21, excludes an abandonment of the structures with the removal of vessels. Inside the hut, it was possible to locate pottery distribution that assumes a partial division of space, reserving the conservation function to the South area and near the North wall. The central area must instead be used for consumption and preparation of food. On the West side, near the entrance, there was a space bordered by a vertical slab, used during phase 1 as a hearth and then as space for storage, with different vessels including a big pithos. During this long period of Capo Graziano facies, human communities spread to other islands resulting in an increase of the population. Filicudi probably, despite having been the first cultural focus, will remain the most isolated and linked to the local craft traditions, not fully acquiring the elaborate decorative motifs of Lipari and Milazzo settlements. The volunteer break of the cup (Martinelli et alii 2010; Martinelli 2015), engraved with a marine scene, took place at the end of life of the F hut. Symbolically, it concludes a presumably more peaceful period before the settlement shift on the Montagnola.","PeriodicalId":30393,"journal":{"name":"IpoTESI di Preistoria","volume":"31 1","pages":"1-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classificazione della ceramica e analisi dei contesti all’inizio dell’età del Bronzo: la capanna F del villaggio di Filo Braccio (Filicudi, Isole Eolie)\",\"authors\":\"M. Martinelli, C. Speciale\",\"doi\":\"10.6092/ISSN.1974-7985/7591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The beginning of the Bronze Age in the Aeolian islands is marked by the Capo Graziano facies. The village of Filo Braccio represents the oldest phase of occupation of the archipelago in the Bronze Age. The settlement of Filo Braccio in Filicudi (Aeolian Islands) was the subject of archaeological investigations since 1959 (Bernabo Brea, Cavalier 1991a) and then resumed in 2009 (Martinelli et alii 2010) and in 2013. Several huts, named A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, L were investigated. They are groups of oval-shaped huts with attached open-air spaces for agricultural and work activities. Three households were identified: A-B-C; F-H; D-G-I-L. The analysis of the hut F represents an analytical study of the nucleus of a household of this complex settlement, inhabited for about five hundred years, during which it can be supposed the succession of at least ten generations. Here the authors decided to edit part of the archaeological excavation on the F hut, to expose pottery chronotypology and deepen the study of the Capo Graziano facies. The four horizons that Bernabo Brea claimed in one of his papers (Bernabo Brea 1982, pp. 12-13) expressed the need for a further scanning within the facies and provided useful ideas for its development. This higher focus on the chronological sequence is today possible thanks to the data that emerged from the recent excavations on the islands. The sequence of Capo Graziano facies in the Aeolian Islands presented by Luigi Bernabo Brea was based mainly on two typological elements: decoration and profile of the bowls. The absence of decoration in the most complex schemes is common in the site of Filo Braccio where, however, some drawings related to the sea, zigzag and boats rarely occur, the latter almost exclusively represented by a unique cup with marine scene. In the other sites of the Aeolian archipelago, the decorative motifs are comparable with each other and fall in the style that will become dominant in the final stage, when the villages shelter on high peaks. The first consideration that has emerged since the resumption of the investigation in the village, is that it was the island of Filicudi the first place to have “landed” the Capo Graziano people. Even considering the other settlements in the archipelago known so far and the distinctive characteristic changes of this facies from an island to another, no other settlement similar to Filo Braccio is known. The location on the coast, the long duration of the occupation (Martinelli et alii 2010; Martinelli 2016) from 2300 to 1700 BC, the absence of decoration in the typical style of pottery, the hut distribution within the site, all of this makes it a settlement in its own right. The hut F, whose internal chronological probably covers a span of about 150 years, is a significant case study: the three stages of life of the structure and pottery types have been compared both vertically in the internal stratigraphy, both horizontally (distribution areas) and with the materials of the structures A, B, C, D, E investigated in 1959. From a historical perspective, Hut F may be located in the early stages of occupation of the village and at an early stage of the culture of Capo Graziano, definitely parallelizable with the phases of the D and E huts, partly with the structures A, B and C and also with the funeral caves of Montagnola. For what to concern the contexts outside of Filicudi, some comparisons are possible with the necropolis of Diana in Lipari, with the village of San Vincenzo in Stromboli and with the Villaggio dei Cipressi in Milazzo. The hut F was inhabited during two main phases: the oldest one (phase 1) and the latest one (phase 2). After the collapse, the area of the structure was still used but no longer as dwelling (phase 3). Between phase 1 and 2 there are differences in the structural elements and in the use of space. For pottery types, there were two main shape indicators: the bowl and the jar. The jars are widespread in all the phases of the hut and in all the Aeolian sites of Capo Graziano facies. Some features indicate the differences between phases: \\n- The rounded bowls (type 4) are present at all stages, but both 4A and 4B prevail in the phases 1-2 - The careened bowls (type 5) are present at all stages but it is possible to reconstruct an evolution that leads from the prevalence of type 5A in the phase 1 to the one of the type 5B (pronounced hull and throat) in steps 2-3 \\n-The pedestal vase (type 12), although represented in all phases, is present to a lesser extent in the phase 1. \\n-The incised decorative motifs are rare and consist of lines in a zigzag pattern somewhat irregular, but the boat depiction appears since the phase 1. \\nWe can finally show some correlation elements with other cultural and geographic sites: \\n- The presence of the pedestal vase (a local production) is widespread in the Sicilian culture of Malpasso-Chiusazza at the end of the Copper Age. \\n- The presence during phase 3 of a “sway-backed” handle, that recalls the Messina-Ricadi facies in the Strait of Messina. \\n- The local manufacture of pithoi, exported to Milazzo and Tindari. \\nEssential part of the work was the analysis of the pottery materials for areal distribution, integrated as much as possible with the functional analysis linked to the shapes. The results will in future be crossed with the data obtained from the analysis of other classes of materials and with the other huts of the village still being studied, for an overall functional reading. It is important to note that throughout the settlement, as in the case of the hut F, there are no traces of violent destruction or sudden abandonment or fire. In addition, the large amount of materials recorded, especially in the US 21, excludes an abandonment of the structures with the removal of vessels. Inside the hut, it was possible to locate pottery distribution that assumes a partial division of space, reserving the conservation function to the South area and near the North wall. The central area must instead be used for consumption and preparation of food. On the West side, near the entrance, there was a space bordered by a vertical slab, used during phase 1 as a hearth and then as space for storage, with different vessels including a big pithos. During this long period of Capo Graziano facies, human communities spread to other islands resulting in an increase of the population. Filicudi probably, despite having been the first cultural focus, will remain the most isolated and linked to the local craft traditions, not fully acquiring the elaborate decorative motifs of Lipari and Milazzo settlements. The volunteer break of the cup (Martinelli et alii 2010; Martinelli 2015), engraved with a marine scene, took place at the end of life of the F hut. Symbolically, it concludes a presumably more peaceful period before the settlement shift on the Montagnola.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IpoTESI di Preistoria\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"1-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IpoTESI di Preistoria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.1974-7985/7591\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IpoTESI di Preistoria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.1974-7985/7591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
-在墨西拿海峡的墨西拿-里卡迪相阶段,出现了一个“摇摆”把手。-本地生产pithoi,出口到Milazzo和Tindari。这项工作的关键部分是对陶器材料的区域分布进行分析,并尽可能地将其与形状相关的功能分析结合起来。这些结果将来将与从其他材料类别的分析中获得的数据以及仍在研究中的该村其他茅屋相结合,以获得总体功能读数。值得注意的是,在整个定居点,如小屋F的情况下,没有暴力破坏或突然遗弃或火灾的痕迹。此外,记录的大量材料,特别是在US 21,排除了因拆除容器而放弃结构的可能性。在小屋内,可以找到陶器的分布,它承担了部分空间划分,保留了南部区域和北墙附近的保护功能。中心区域必须用来消费和准备食物。在西侧,靠近入口的地方,有一个由垂直板隔开的空间,在第一阶段用作壁炉,然后用作存储空间,有不同的容器,包括一个大的祭坛。在这个漫长的格拉齐亚诺角相时期,人类社区扩散到其他岛屿,导致人口增加。尽管Filicudi是第一个文化中心,但它可能仍然是最孤立的,与当地的工艺传统联系在一起,不会完全获得Lipari和Milazzo定居点的精心装饰图案。志愿者打破杯子(Martinelli et alii 2010;Martinelli 2015),雕刻了一个海洋场景,发生在F小屋生命的最后阶段。象征性地,它结束了在蒙塔尼奥拉定居转移之前一段可能比较和平的时期。
Classificazione della ceramica e analisi dei contesti all’inizio dell’età del Bronzo: la capanna F del villaggio di Filo Braccio (Filicudi, Isole Eolie)
The beginning of the Bronze Age in the Aeolian islands is marked by the Capo Graziano facies. The village of Filo Braccio represents the oldest phase of occupation of the archipelago in the Bronze Age. The settlement of Filo Braccio in Filicudi (Aeolian Islands) was the subject of archaeological investigations since 1959 (Bernabo Brea, Cavalier 1991a) and then resumed in 2009 (Martinelli et alii 2010) and in 2013. Several huts, named A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, L were investigated. They are groups of oval-shaped huts with attached open-air spaces for agricultural and work activities. Three households were identified: A-B-C; F-H; D-G-I-L. The analysis of the hut F represents an analytical study of the nucleus of a household of this complex settlement, inhabited for about five hundred years, during which it can be supposed the succession of at least ten generations. Here the authors decided to edit part of the archaeological excavation on the F hut, to expose pottery chronotypology and deepen the study of the Capo Graziano facies. The four horizons that Bernabo Brea claimed in one of his papers (Bernabo Brea 1982, pp. 12-13) expressed the need for a further scanning within the facies and provided useful ideas for its development. This higher focus on the chronological sequence is today possible thanks to the data that emerged from the recent excavations on the islands. The sequence of Capo Graziano facies in the Aeolian Islands presented by Luigi Bernabo Brea was based mainly on two typological elements: decoration and profile of the bowls. The absence of decoration in the most complex schemes is common in the site of Filo Braccio where, however, some drawings related to the sea, zigzag and boats rarely occur, the latter almost exclusively represented by a unique cup with marine scene. In the other sites of the Aeolian archipelago, the decorative motifs are comparable with each other and fall in the style that will become dominant in the final stage, when the villages shelter on high peaks. The first consideration that has emerged since the resumption of the investigation in the village, is that it was the island of Filicudi the first place to have “landed” the Capo Graziano people. Even considering the other settlements in the archipelago known so far and the distinctive characteristic changes of this facies from an island to another, no other settlement similar to Filo Braccio is known. The location on the coast, the long duration of the occupation (Martinelli et alii 2010; Martinelli 2016) from 2300 to 1700 BC, the absence of decoration in the typical style of pottery, the hut distribution within the site, all of this makes it a settlement in its own right. The hut F, whose internal chronological probably covers a span of about 150 years, is a significant case study: the three stages of life of the structure and pottery types have been compared both vertically in the internal stratigraphy, both horizontally (distribution areas) and with the materials of the structures A, B, C, D, E investigated in 1959. From a historical perspective, Hut F may be located in the early stages of occupation of the village and at an early stage of the culture of Capo Graziano, definitely parallelizable with the phases of the D and E huts, partly with the structures A, B and C and also with the funeral caves of Montagnola. For what to concern the contexts outside of Filicudi, some comparisons are possible with the necropolis of Diana in Lipari, with the village of San Vincenzo in Stromboli and with the Villaggio dei Cipressi in Milazzo. The hut F was inhabited during two main phases: the oldest one (phase 1) and the latest one (phase 2). After the collapse, the area of the structure was still used but no longer as dwelling (phase 3). Between phase 1 and 2 there are differences in the structural elements and in the use of space. For pottery types, there were two main shape indicators: the bowl and the jar. The jars are widespread in all the phases of the hut and in all the Aeolian sites of Capo Graziano facies. Some features indicate the differences between phases:
- The rounded bowls (type 4) are present at all stages, but both 4A and 4B prevail in the phases 1-2 - The careened bowls (type 5) are present at all stages but it is possible to reconstruct an evolution that leads from the prevalence of type 5A in the phase 1 to the one of the type 5B (pronounced hull and throat) in steps 2-3
-The pedestal vase (type 12), although represented in all phases, is present to a lesser extent in the phase 1.
-The incised decorative motifs are rare and consist of lines in a zigzag pattern somewhat irregular, but the boat depiction appears since the phase 1.
We can finally show some correlation elements with other cultural and geographic sites:
- The presence of the pedestal vase (a local production) is widespread in the Sicilian culture of Malpasso-Chiusazza at the end of the Copper Age.
- The presence during phase 3 of a “sway-backed” handle, that recalls the Messina-Ricadi facies in the Strait of Messina.
- The local manufacture of pithoi, exported to Milazzo and Tindari.
Essential part of the work was the analysis of the pottery materials for areal distribution, integrated as much as possible with the functional analysis linked to the shapes. The results will in future be crossed with the data obtained from the analysis of other classes of materials and with the other huts of the village still being studied, for an overall functional reading. It is important to note that throughout the settlement, as in the case of the hut F, there are no traces of violent destruction or sudden abandonment or fire. In addition, the large amount of materials recorded, especially in the US 21, excludes an abandonment of the structures with the removal of vessels. Inside the hut, it was possible to locate pottery distribution that assumes a partial division of space, reserving the conservation function to the South area and near the North wall. The central area must instead be used for consumption and preparation of food. On the West side, near the entrance, there was a space bordered by a vertical slab, used during phase 1 as a hearth and then as space for storage, with different vessels including a big pithos. During this long period of Capo Graziano facies, human communities spread to other islands resulting in an increase of the population. Filicudi probably, despite having been the first cultural focus, will remain the most isolated and linked to the local craft traditions, not fully acquiring the elaborate decorative motifs of Lipari and Milazzo settlements. The volunteer break of the cup (Martinelli et alii 2010; Martinelli 2015), engraved with a marine scene, took place at the end of life of the F hut. Symbolically, it concludes a presumably more peaceful period before the settlement shift on the Montagnola.