物联网系统中的冲突检测和解决:综述

P. Pradeep, K. Kant
{"title":"物联网系统中的冲突检测和解决:综述","authors":"P. Pradeep, K. Kant","doi":"10.3390/iot3010012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Internet of Things (IoT) systems are becoming ubiquitous in various cyber–physical infrastructures, including buildings, vehicular traffic, goods transport and delivery, manufacturing, health care, urban farming, etc. Often multiple such IoT subsystems are deployed in the same physical area and designed, deployed, maintained, and perhaps even operated by different vendors or organizations (or “parties”). The collective operational behavior of multiple IoT subsystems can be characterized via (1) a set of operational rules and required safety properties and (2) a collection of IoT-based services or applications that interact with one another and share concurrent access to the devices. In both cases, this collective behavior often leads to situations where their operation may conflict, and the conflict resolution becomes complex due to lack of visibility into or understanding of the cross-subsystem interactions and inability to do cross-subsystem actuations. This article addresses the fundamental problem of detecting and resolving safety property violations. We detail the inherent complexities of the problem, survey the work already performed, and layout the future challenges. We also highlight the significance of detecting/resolving conflicts proactively, i.e., dynamically but with a look-ahead into the future based on the context.","PeriodicalId":6745,"journal":{"name":"2019 II Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT (MetroInd4.0&IoT)","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conflict Detection and Resolution in IoT Systems: A Survey\",\"authors\":\"P. Pradeep, K. Kant\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/iot3010012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Internet of Things (IoT) systems are becoming ubiquitous in various cyber–physical infrastructures, including buildings, vehicular traffic, goods transport and delivery, manufacturing, health care, urban farming, etc. Often multiple such IoT subsystems are deployed in the same physical area and designed, deployed, maintained, and perhaps even operated by different vendors or organizations (or “parties”). The collective operational behavior of multiple IoT subsystems can be characterized via (1) a set of operational rules and required safety properties and (2) a collection of IoT-based services or applications that interact with one another and share concurrent access to the devices. In both cases, this collective behavior often leads to situations where their operation may conflict, and the conflict resolution becomes complex due to lack of visibility into or understanding of the cross-subsystem interactions and inability to do cross-subsystem actuations. This article addresses the fundamental problem of detecting and resolving safety property violations. We detail the inherent complexities of the problem, survey the work already performed, and layout the future challenges. We also highlight the significance of detecting/resolving conflicts proactively, i.e., dynamically but with a look-ahead into the future based on the context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 II Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT (MetroInd4.0&IoT)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 II Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT (MetroInd4.0&IoT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/iot3010012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 II Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT (MetroInd4.0&IoT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/iot3010012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

物联网(IoT)系统在各种网络物理基础设施中变得无处不在,包括建筑物,车辆交通,货物运输和交付,制造业,医疗保健,城市农业等。通常,多个这样的物联网子系统部署在相同的物理区域,并由不同的供应商或组织(或“各方”)设计、部署、维护甚至操作。多个物联网子系统的集体操作行为可以通过(1)一组操作规则和所需的安全属性以及(2)基于物联网的服务或应用程序的集合来表征,这些服务或应用程序彼此交互并共享对设备的并发访问。在这两种情况下,这种集体行为经常导致它们的操作可能发生冲突的情况,并且由于缺乏对跨子系统交互的可见性或理解以及无法执行跨子系统驱动,冲突解决变得复杂。本文讨论了检测和解决违反安全属性的基本问题。我们详细说明了问题的内在复杂性,调查了已经完成的工作,并规划了未来的挑战。我们还强调了主动检测/解决冲突的重要性,即动态地但基于上下文展望未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conflict Detection and Resolution in IoT Systems: A Survey
Internet of Things (IoT) systems are becoming ubiquitous in various cyber–physical infrastructures, including buildings, vehicular traffic, goods transport and delivery, manufacturing, health care, urban farming, etc. Often multiple such IoT subsystems are deployed in the same physical area and designed, deployed, maintained, and perhaps even operated by different vendors or organizations (or “parties”). The collective operational behavior of multiple IoT subsystems can be characterized via (1) a set of operational rules and required safety properties and (2) a collection of IoT-based services or applications that interact with one another and share concurrent access to the devices. In both cases, this collective behavior often leads to situations where their operation may conflict, and the conflict resolution becomes complex due to lack of visibility into or understanding of the cross-subsystem interactions and inability to do cross-subsystem actuations. This article addresses the fundamental problem of detecting and resolving safety property violations. We detail the inherent complexities of the problem, survey the work already performed, and layout the future challenges. We also highlight the significance of detecting/resolving conflicts proactively, i.e., dynamically but with a look-ahead into the future based on the context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信