斯里兰卡的无名宪法和权力分享

Indian Law Review Pub Date : 2022-03-28 DOI:10.1080/24730580.2022.2057107

Sanjayan Rajasingham

{"title":"斯里兰卡的无名宪法和权力分享","authors":"Sanjayan Rajasingham","doi":"10.1080/24730580.2022.2057107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT If a constitution with a federal label is politically impossible in Sri Lanka, might an innominate constitution be the next-best alternative? This article draws on comparative experience in India, South Africa and Spain to argue in favour of an innominate constitution for Sri Lanka. The experience of these states suggests pathways that can both federalize an innominate constitution and build the constitutional culture necessary for a future, explicitly federal, Sri Lankan constitution.","PeriodicalId":13511,"journal":{"name":"Indian Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innominate constitutions and power-sharing in Sri Lanka\",\"authors\":\"Sanjayan Rajasingham\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24730580.2022.2057107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT If a constitution with a federal label is politically impossible in Sri Lanka, might an innominate constitution be the next-best alternative? This article draws on comparative experience in India, South Africa and Spain to argue in favour of an innominate constitution for Sri Lanka. The experience of these states suggests pathways that can both federalize an innominate constitution and build the constitutional culture necessary for a future, explicitly federal, Sri Lankan constitution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2022.2057107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2022.2057107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

如果一部带有联邦标签的宪法在斯里兰卡在政治上是不可能的，那么一部未提名的宪法可能是次佳选择吗?这篇文章借鉴了印度、南非和西班牙的比较经验，以支持斯里兰卡的无记名宪法。这些邦的经验为我们提供了一条道路，既可以使一部没有提名的宪法联邦化，又可以为未来明确的联邦制斯里兰卡宪法建立必要的宪法文化。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Innominate constitutions and power-sharing in Sri Lanka

ABSTRACT If a constitution with a federal label is politically impossible in Sri Lanka, might an innominate constitution be the next-best alternative? This article draws on comparative experience in India, South Africa and Spain to argue in favour of an innominate constitution for Sri Lanka. The experience of these states suggests pathways that can both federalize an innominate constitution and build the constitutional culture necessary for a future, explicitly federal, Sri Lankan constitution.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Indian Law Review

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量