探索将编程纳入K-12课程的令人信服的理由

Iman H. Aljameel
{"title":"探索将编程纳入K-12课程的令人信服的理由","authors":"Iman H. Aljameel","doi":"10.18844/ijire.v9i2.8460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to conduct a literature review to explore the justification for including programming and coding in K–12 curricula. Additionally, it considers the value of teaching computational thinking and programming principles, pedagogical strategies, and the advantages and drawbacks of teaching programming to young students. Most studies acknowledge that programming courses effectively motivate and engage students and achieve learning objectives. However, research reveals that teachers lack the skills to teach programming, and even seasoned educators may find it challenging to develop and implement the necessary pedagogical strategies. Researchers recommend using frameworks based on sociocultural theories of learning, increased resources and training, student-centered instruction, and lowering teacher workload, which has led various nations to re-evaluate their curricula. Finally, the review concludes by suggesting the need for more research on how teaching and learning programming affects learning in other academic disciplines.\nKeywords: Computer education, computational thinking, pedagogical strategies, programming, K–12 curricula;","PeriodicalId":13793,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the compelling rationale to include programming in the K-12 curriculum\",\"authors\":\"Iman H. Aljameel\",\"doi\":\"10.18844/ijire.v9i2.8460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to conduct a literature review to explore the justification for including programming and coding in K–12 curricula. Additionally, it considers the value of teaching computational thinking and programming principles, pedagogical strategies, and the advantages and drawbacks of teaching programming to young students. Most studies acknowledge that programming courses effectively motivate and engage students and achieve learning objectives. However, research reveals that teachers lack the skills to teach programming, and even seasoned educators may find it challenging to develop and implement the necessary pedagogical strategies. Researchers recommend using frameworks based on sociocultural theories of learning, increased resources and training, student-centered instruction, and lowering teacher workload, which has led various nations to re-evaluate their curricula. Finally, the review concludes by suggesting the need for more research on how teaching and learning programming affects learning in other academic disciplines.\\nKeywords: Computer education, computational thinking, pedagogical strategies, programming, K–12 curricula;\",\"PeriodicalId\":13793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18844/ijire.v9i2.8460\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18844/ijire.v9i2.8460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在进行文献综述,探讨在K-12课程中加入编程和编码的理由。此外,它还考虑了教授计算思维和编程原理的价值,教学策略,以及向年轻学生教授编程的优点和缺点。大多数研究承认编程课程有效地激励和吸引学生并实现学习目标。然而,研究表明,教师缺乏教授编程的技能,即使是经验丰富的教育工作者也可能发现开发和实施必要的教学策略是一项挑战。研究人员建议使用基于社会文化学习理论的框架,增加资源和培训,以学生为中心的教学,降低教师的工作量,这导致许多国家重新评估他们的课程。最后,本文总结了教学和学习编程如何影响其他学科学习的研究需求。关键词:计算机教育,计算思维,教学策略,编程,K-12课程;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the compelling rationale to include programming in the K-12 curriculum
This study aims to conduct a literature review to explore the justification for including programming and coding in K–12 curricula. Additionally, it considers the value of teaching computational thinking and programming principles, pedagogical strategies, and the advantages and drawbacks of teaching programming to young students. Most studies acknowledge that programming courses effectively motivate and engage students and achieve learning objectives. However, research reveals that teachers lack the skills to teach programming, and even seasoned educators may find it challenging to develop and implement the necessary pedagogical strategies. Researchers recommend using frameworks based on sociocultural theories of learning, increased resources and training, student-centered instruction, and lowering teacher workload, which has led various nations to re-evaluate their curricula. Finally, the review concludes by suggesting the need for more research on how teaching and learning programming affects learning in other academic disciplines. Keywords: Computer education, computational thinking, pedagogical strategies, programming, K–12 curricula;
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信