头晕和人格解体

W.D Fewtrell , K.P O'Connor
{"title":"头晕和人格解体","authors":"W.D Fewtrell ,&nbsp;K.P O'Connor","doi":"10.1016/0146-6402(88)90015-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Complaints of dizziness and depersonalisation are frequently associated with anxiety and/or medical problems. However, neither experience can be tied exclusively to one medical or psychosomatic disorder. Although both experiences have been reported during anxiety, neither can be related directly to anxiety level and it seems probable that both arise in the wake of psychological concomitants to <em>change</em> in arousal rather than to high arousal itself.</p><p>The importance of cognitive processes is a neglected element in both dizziness and depersonalisation. Both experiences are amenable to cognitive intervention as a therapeutic measure. Cognitive and in particular cognitive-perceptual conflict can provoke both experiences. Cognitive attributions about the meaning of an attack form major distress-defining constituents of each experience</p><p>Two models are discussed: one, that dizziness and depersonalisation are the same experience described differently; the other, a bipolar hypothesis, proposes that the two experiences form opposite ends of a dimension describing disturbed self-world relations. This type of disturbance is not easily described in everyday vocabulary and attention to the precise phenomenology of both complaints would help further psychological understanding.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100041,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"10 4","pages":"Pages 201-218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(88)90015-X","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dizziness and depersonalisation\",\"authors\":\"W.D Fewtrell ,&nbsp;K.P O'Connor\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0146-6402(88)90015-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Complaints of dizziness and depersonalisation are frequently associated with anxiety and/or medical problems. However, neither experience can be tied exclusively to one medical or psychosomatic disorder. Although both experiences have been reported during anxiety, neither can be related directly to anxiety level and it seems probable that both arise in the wake of psychological concomitants to <em>change</em> in arousal rather than to high arousal itself.</p><p>The importance of cognitive processes is a neglected element in both dizziness and depersonalisation. Both experiences are amenable to cognitive intervention as a therapeutic measure. Cognitive and in particular cognitive-perceptual conflict can provoke both experiences. Cognitive attributions about the meaning of an attack form major distress-defining constituents of each experience</p><p>Two models are discussed: one, that dizziness and depersonalisation are the same experience described differently; the other, a bipolar hypothesis, proposes that the two experiences form opposite ends of a dimension describing disturbed self-world relations. This type of disturbance is not easily described in everyday vocabulary and attention to the precise phenomenology of both complaints would help further psychological understanding.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 201-218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(88)90015-X\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014664028890015X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014664028890015X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

头晕和人格解体的主诉通常与焦虑和/或医疗问题有关。然而,这两种经历都不能完全与一种医学或身心障碍联系在一起。尽管这两种经历都在焦虑期间被报道过,但它们都不能与焦虑水平直接相关,而且似乎两者都是在觉醒改变的心理伴随物之后出现的,而不是高觉醒本身。认知过程的重要性在头晕和人格解体中都被忽视了。这两种经历都可以作为一种治疗措施进行认知干预。认知冲突,特别是认知-知觉冲突会引发这两种体验。关于攻击意义的认知归因形成了每种经历的主要痛苦定义成分。讨论了两种模型:一种,头晕和人格解体是同一种经历,但描述不同;另一种是两极假说,认为这两种经历形成了一个维度的两端,描述了被干扰的自我世界关系。这种类型的干扰不容易在日常词汇中描述,注意这两种抱怨的精确现象学将有助于进一步的心理学理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dizziness and depersonalisation

Complaints of dizziness and depersonalisation are frequently associated with anxiety and/or medical problems. However, neither experience can be tied exclusively to one medical or psychosomatic disorder. Although both experiences have been reported during anxiety, neither can be related directly to anxiety level and it seems probable that both arise in the wake of psychological concomitants to change in arousal rather than to high arousal itself.

The importance of cognitive processes is a neglected element in both dizziness and depersonalisation. Both experiences are amenable to cognitive intervention as a therapeutic measure. Cognitive and in particular cognitive-perceptual conflict can provoke both experiences. Cognitive attributions about the meaning of an attack form major distress-defining constituents of each experience

Two models are discussed: one, that dizziness and depersonalisation are the same experience described differently; the other, a bipolar hypothesis, proposes that the two experiences form opposite ends of a dimension describing disturbed self-world relations. This type of disturbance is not easily described in everyday vocabulary and attention to the precise phenomenology of both complaints would help further psychological understanding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信