跨浏览器不兼容分类布局:不同模型的比较研究

D. Silva, W. Watanabe
{"title":"跨浏览器不兼容分类布局:不同模型的比较研究","authors":"D. Silva, W. Watanabe","doi":"10.1109/CLEI53233.2021.9640171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When the same web application is rendered in different browsers, inconsistencies detected in the layout or behavior of pages are known as (XBIs Cross Browser Incompatibilities). Currently, there are different classification models in the literature for the identification and automatic correction of XBIs. These models have evolved with the aim of reducing false positives and negatives. This paper proposes to compare these different models, focusing on those that use the classification of layout XBIs, through machine learning algorithms. There is still no paper in the literature to compare them, identifying their main advantages and disadvantages. This paper consists of an experiment that compares the results of models and presents metrics that allow to affirm how effective they are, aiming also to bring important information as contributions to propose future works regarding the evolution of the explored models. The result of the experiment is the metric of F-Score. For this metric, the higher values imply greater efficiency in detecting incompatibilities between browsers, and the C5.0 10 iterations - X configuration obtained the best result in the experiment.","PeriodicalId":6803,"journal":{"name":"2021 XLVII Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)","volume":"34 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-Browser Incompatibilities Classification Layout: A comparative study between different models\",\"authors\":\"D. Silva, W. Watanabe\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CLEI53233.2021.9640171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When the same web application is rendered in different browsers, inconsistencies detected in the layout or behavior of pages are known as (XBIs Cross Browser Incompatibilities). Currently, there are different classification models in the literature for the identification and automatic correction of XBIs. These models have evolved with the aim of reducing false positives and negatives. This paper proposes to compare these different models, focusing on those that use the classification of layout XBIs, through machine learning algorithms. There is still no paper in the literature to compare them, identifying their main advantages and disadvantages. This paper consists of an experiment that compares the results of models and presents metrics that allow to affirm how effective they are, aiming also to bring important information as contributions to propose future works regarding the evolution of the explored models. The result of the experiment is the metric of F-Score. For this metric, the higher values imply greater efficiency in detecting incompatibilities between browsers, and the C5.0 10 iterations - X configuration obtained the best result in the experiment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 XLVII Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 XLVII Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI53233.2021.9640171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 XLVII Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI53233.2021.9640171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

当相同的web应用程序在不同的浏览器中呈现时,在页面布局或行为中检测到的不一致被称为(XBIs跨浏览器不兼容)。目前,针对xbi的识别和自动校正,文献中存在不同的分类模型。这些模式的发展是为了减少误报和误报。本文建议通过机器学习算法比较这些不同的模型,重点关注那些使用布局xbi分类的模型。在文献中仍然没有一篇论文对它们进行比较,确定它们的主要优点和缺点。本文由一个实验组成,该实验比较了模型的结果,并提出了可以确认它们的有效性的指标,旨在提供重要的信息作为贡献,以提出有关所探索模型演变的未来工作。实验的结果是F-Score的度量。对于这个指标,更高的值意味着在检测浏览器之间的不兼容性方面效率更高,并且C5.0 10迭代- X配置在实验中获得了最好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-Browser Incompatibilities Classification Layout: A comparative study between different models
When the same web application is rendered in different browsers, inconsistencies detected in the layout or behavior of pages are known as (XBIs Cross Browser Incompatibilities). Currently, there are different classification models in the literature for the identification and automatic correction of XBIs. These models have evolved with the aim of reducing false positives and negatives. This paper proposes to compare these different models, focusing on those that use the classification of layout XBIs, through machine learning algorithms. There is still no paper in the literature to compare them, identifying their main advantages and disadvantages. This paper consists of an experiment that compares the results of models and presents metrics that allow to affirm how effective they are, aiming also to bring important information as contributions to propose future works regarding the evolution of the explored models. The result of the experiment is the metric of F-Score. For this metric, the higher values imply greater efficiency in detecting incompatibilities between browsers, and the C5.0 10 iterations - X configuration obtained the best result in the experiment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信