悬案杀人和分配优先调查:对现有文献的回顾

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Katrina Nurthen, Luke van der Laan
{"title":"悬案杀人和分配优先调查:对现有文献的回顾","authors":"Katrina Nurthen, Luke van der Laan","doi":"10.1108/pijpsm-12-2021-0170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this scoping literature review was to identify and consolidate all available theories and methods for cold case homicide evaluation, solvability and priority ranking that would serve to guide a broader exploratory study and future research.Design/methodology/approachThe paper presents the findings of a scoping literature review. The review forms part of a broader exploratory study. The scoping literature review sought to identify reported evidence from the extant literature in identifying and defining key concepts relevant to cold prioritisation. It also sought to identify any knowledge gaps relevant to the scoping review question.FindingsThe review suggested that internationally, there is a wide variance and inconsistency in the processes, methods and criteria used by policing agencies to evaluate and prioritise cold cases for investigation. Despite this, there were four themes that could be regarded as [parameters for future cold case research: cold case evaluation and review, prioritisation methods, solvability and prioritisation systems and tools. The review revealed several gaps in the literature. No papers could be found discussing the allocation of individual priority rankings based on any kind of weighted criteria system or model. Further, no information could be found in the available literature on any automated systems, online tools, algorithms, or applications utilised when evaluating or prioritising cases.Research limitations/implicationsThe research results are limited in that it is possible that relevant extant literature exists that was not discoverable using the scoping review search strategy.Practical implicationsThe paper is a part of a broader exploratory study that seeks to develop a framework for cold case prioritisation that, in a time where public scrutiny has increased, has increased transparency with clearly articulated criteria for evaluation and process.Originality/valueThis paper assimilates the extant literature associated with cold case evaluation and prioritisation and presents a summary of themes and gaps in knowledge that informs future research.","PeriodicalId":47881,"journal":{"name":"Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cold case homicides and assigning priority for investigation: a review of available literature\",\"authors\":\"Katrina Nurthen, Luke van der Laan\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/pijpsm-12-2021-0170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe purpose of this scoping literature review was to identify and consolidate all available theories and methods for cold case homicide evaluation, solvability and priority ranking that would serve to guide a broader exploratory study and future research.Design/methodology/approachThe paper presents the findings of a scoping literature review. The review forms part of a broader exploratory study. The scoping literature review sought to identify reported evidence from the extant literature in identifying and defining key concepts relevant to cold prioritisation. It also sought to identify any knowledge gaps relevant to the scoping review question.FindingsThe review suggested that internationally, there is a wide variance and inconsistency in the processes, methods and criteria used by policing agencies to evaluate and prioritise cold cases for investigation. Despite this, there were four themes that could be regarded as [parameters for future cold case research: cold case evaluation and review, prioritisation methods, solvability and prioritisation systems and tools. The review revealed several gaps in the literature. No papers could be found discussing the allocation of individual priority rankings based on any kind of weighted criteria system or model. Further, no information could be found in the available literature on any automated systems, online tools, algorithms, or applications utilised when evaluating or prioritising cases.Research limitations/implicationsThe research results are limited in that it is possible that relevant extant literature exists that was not discoverable using the scoping review search strategy.Practical implicationsThe paper is a part of a broader exploratory study that seeks to develop a framework for cold case prioritisation that, in a time where public scrutiny has increased, has increased transparency with clearly articulated criteria for evaluation and process.Originality/valueThis paper assimilates the extant literature associated with cold case evaluation and prioritisation and presents a summary of themes and gaps in knowledge that informs future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/pijpsm-12-2021-0170\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pijpsm-12-2021-0170","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本文献综述的目的是识别和巩固所有现有的悬案杀人评估、可解性和优先级排序的理论和方法,以指导更广泛的探索性研究和未来的研究。设计/方法/方法这篇论文介绍了一项范围界定文献综述的发现。这篇综述是一项更广泛的探索性研究的一部分。范围文献综述试图从现有文献中识别和定义与冷优先级相关的关键概念的报告证据。它还设法查明与范围审查问题有关的任何知识差距。审查结果表明,在国际上,警察机构用于评估和优先调查悬案的过程、方法和标准存在很大差异和不一致。尽管如此,有四个主题可以被视为未来悬案研究的参数:悬案评估和审查,优先排序方法,可解决性和优先排序系统和工具。这篇综述揭示了文献中的一些空白。在任何一种加权标准体系或模型的基础上,都找不到讨论个人优先级分配的论文。此外,在现有文献中,没有发现任何自动化系统、在线工具、算法或应用程序在评估或优先考虑案例时所使用的信息。研究局限性/意义研究结果的局限性在于,可能存在相关的现有文献,而这些文献是使用范围审查检索策略无法发现的。本文是一项更广泛的探索性研究的一部分,该研究旨在开发一个悬案优先排序框架,在公众监督增加的时代,通过明确阐述的评估和过程标准,提高了透明度。原创性/价值本文吸收了与悬案评估和优先排序相关的现有文献,并概述了为未来研究提供信息的主题和知识空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cold case homicides and assigning priority for investigation: a review of available literature
PurposeThe purpose of this scoping literature review was to identify and consolidate all available theories and methods for cold case homicide evaluation, solvability and priority ranking that would serve to guide a broader exploratory study and future research.Design/methodology/approachThe paper presents the findings of a scoping literature review. The review forms part of a broader exploratory study. The scoping literature review sought to identify reported evidence from the extant literature in identifying and defining key concepts relevant to cold prioritisation. It also sought to identify any knowledge gaps relevant to the scoping review question.FindingsThe review suggested that internationally, there is a wide variance and inconsistency in the processes, methods and criteria used by policing agencies to evaluate and prioritise cold cases for investigation. Despite this, there were four themes that could be regarded as [parameters for future cold case research: cold case evaluation and review, prioritisation methods, solvability and prioritisation systems and tools. The review revealed several gaps in the literature. No papers could be found discussing the allocation of individual priority rankings based on any kind of weighted criteria system or model. Further, no information could be found in the available literature on any automated systems, online tools, algorithms, or applications utilised when evaluating or prioritising cases.Research limitations/implicationsThe research results are limited in that it is possible that relevant extant literature exists that was not discoverable using the scoping review search strategy.Practical implicationsThe paper is a part of a broader exploratory study that seeks to develop a framework for cold case prioritisation that, in a time where public scrutiny has increased, has increased transparency with clearly articulated criteria for evaluation and process.Originality/valueThis paper assimilates the extant literature associated with cold case evaluation and prioritisation and presents a summary of themes and gaps in knowledge that informs future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
15.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: ■Community policing ■Managerial styles and leadership ■Performance measurement and accountability ■Pursuit guidelines ■Crime trends and analysis ■Crisis negotiation ■Civil disorder ■Organized crime ■Victimology ■Crime prevention ■Career development ■High risk police activities ■Routine policing ■Traffic enforcement ■Civil litigation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信