基于压缩感知的图像融合算法比较分析

Q3 Medicine
M. Gayathri Devi, S. Manjula
{"title":"基于压缩感知的图像融合算法比较分析","authors":"M. Gayathri Devi, S. Manjula","doi":"10.1109/I-SMAC.2018.8653701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is about study of comparative analysis of Spatial and Transform domain fusion techniques under Compressive Sensing or Compressive Sampling principle. The compressive measurements of two source images are obtained using star shaped sampling pattern and fuse the measurements. The output image is reconstructed from 25% of samples using Minimum Total Variation method with equality constraints and with reduced computational time. Finally, for different fusion techniques under Compressive Sensing are performed and compared. Multi focus and Multi modal images are used for simulation and no prior knowledge of source images is required for reconstruction. Based on fusion evaluation metric with reference and without reference image conclude that in spatial domain, simple average & principal component analysis and in transform domain, DCTav and Laplacian Pyramid are performed well.","PeriodicalId":53631,"journal":{"name":"Koomesh","volume":"2012 1","pages":"295-301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Analysis on Image Fusion Algorithms based on Compressive Sensing\",\"authors\":\"M. Gayathri Devi, S. Manjula\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/I-SMAC.2018.8653701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is about study of comparative analysis of Spatial and Transform domain fusion techniques under Compressive Sensing or Compressive Sampling principle. The compressive measurements of two source images are obtained using star shaped sampling pattern and fuse the measurements. The output image is reconstructed from 25% of samples using Minimum Total Variation method with equality constraints and with reduced computational time. Finally, for different fusion techniques under Compressive Sensing are performed and compared. Multi focus and Multi modal images are used for simulation and no prior knowledge of source images is required for reconstruction. Based on fusion evaluation metric with reference and without reference image conclude that in spatial domain, simple average & principal component analysis and in transform domain, DCTav and Laplacian Pyramid are performed well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Koomesh\",\"volume\":\"2012 1\",\"pages\":\"295-301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Koomesh\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/I-SMAC.2018.8653701\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Koomesh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/I-SMAC.2018.8653701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对压缩感知和压缩采样原理下的空间域和变换域融合技术进行了比较分析研究。采用星形采样模式获得两源图像的压缩测量值,并将测量值融合。输出图像采用最小总变分法从25%的样本中重建,该方法具有相等约束,减少了计算时间。最后,对不同的压缩感知融合技术进行了比较。仿真采用多焦点和多模态图像,重构时不需要对源图像有先验知识。基于参考图像和无参考图像的融合评价指标,得出在空间域、简单平均和主成分分析以及在变换域,DCTav和拉普拉斯金字塔具有良好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Analysis on Image Fusion Algorithms based on Compressive Sensing
This paper is about study of comparative analysis of Spatial and Transform domain fusion techniques under Compressive Sensing or Compressive Sampling principle. The compressive measurements of two source images are obtained using star shaped sampling pattern and fuse the measurements. The output image is reconstructed from 25% of samples using Minimum Total Variation method with equality constraints and with reduced computational time. Finally, for different fusion techniques under Compressive Sensing are performed and compared. Multi focus and Multi modal images are used for simulation and no prior knowledge of source images is required for reconstruction. Based on fusion evaluation metric with reference and without reference image conclude that in spatial domain, simple average & principal component analysis and in transform domain, DCTav and Laplacian Pyramid are performed well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Koomesh
Koomesh Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信