波利策的测试——但哪一个呢?对耳科术语标准化的请求

A. Mudry, J. Young
{"title":"波利策的测试——但哪一个呢?对耳科术语标准化的请求","authors":"A. Mudry, J. Young","doi":"10.1017/S002221512200130X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Politzer's tuning fork test is a little-known special examination with a chequered history. Objective This paper gives Politzer's original description, and explains how he intended it to be used. Methods The historiographical research in this study is based on primary references. Secondary documentation is only cited when it is necessary to substantiate any historical argument. Results and conclusion After the apparent disappearance of Politzer's tuning fork test from the otological scene in the 1950s, its consequent resurrection was not what it seemed. This story underlines the need for a standardisation of otological nomenclature, particularly when eponyms are used.","PeriodicalId":22757,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Laryngology & Otology","volume":"25 1","pages":"1023 - 1026"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Politzer's test – but which one? A plea for standardisation of terms in otology\",\"authors\":\"A. Mudry, J. Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S002221512200130X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background Politzer's tuning fork test is a little-known special examination with a chequered history. Objective This paper gives Politzer's original description, and explains how he intended it to be used. Methods The historiographical research in this study is based on primary references. Secondary documentation is only cited when it is necessary to substantiate any historical argument. Results and conclusion After the apparent disappearance of Politzer's tuning fork test from the otological scene in the 1950s, its consequent resurrection was not what it seemed. This story underlines the need for a standardisation of otological nomenclature, particularly when eponyms are used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Laryngology & Otology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1023 - 1026\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Laryngology & Otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S002221512200130X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Laryngology & Otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S002221512200130X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

波利茨尔音叉测验是一项鲜为人知的特殊考试,历史曲折。本文给出了Politzer的原始描述,并解释了他打算如何使用它。方法本研究的史学研究以原始文献为基础。二手文献只有在需要证实任何历史论点时才会被引用。结果和结论波利策音叉测试在20世纪50年代从耳科领域消失后,它的复活并不像它看起来的那样。这个故事强调了耳科命名法标准化的必要性,特别是在使用名字的时候。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Politzer's test – but which one? A plea for standardisation of terms in otology
Abstract Background Politzer's tuning fork test is a little-known special examination with a chequered history. Objective This paper gives Politzer's original description, and explains how he intended it to be used. Methods The historiographical research in this study is based on primary references. Secondary documentation is only cited when it is necessary to substantiate any historical argument. Results and conclusion After the apparent disappearance of Politzer's tuning fork test from the otological scene in the 1950s, its consequent resurrection was not what it seemed. This story underlines the need for a standardisation of otological nomenclature, particularly when eponyms are used.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信