基于statolite的巨蝮科物种鉴定方法

Z. Fang, Xinjun Chen
{"title":"基于statolite的巨蝮科物种鉴定方法","authors":"Z. Fang, Xinjun Chen","doi":"10.1109/CISP-BMEI.2017.8302015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statoliths are a pair of calcareous structures which can provide biological and ecological information for cephalopods. Understanding their shape will help us know the taxonomy of cephalopods, even to the species level. Ommastrephes bartramii, Dosidicus gigas and Illex argentinus are chosen to compare the shape of their statolith as a means of species identification because of their ecological importance to the marine ecosystems. The results show that D. gigas has a relatively large sized statolith and I. argentinus has the smallest. The four main parts of the statolith (dorsal dome, lateral dome, rostrum and wing) in the different species were diverse and distinguishable. The traditional method effectively separated the three species of statolith with high classification rates (92.0%–100%) by six morphology variables. The outline method produced a relatively low classification rate (73.4%–94.2%) using six harmonic numbers and stepwise discriminant analysis (SDA). The result in this study demonstrates that traditional method would achieve a better performance when the species are not so closely related phylogenetically, and outline method is more suitable for the statolith identification at the genus level. It is necessary to compare other cephalopod statoliths by different methods and find a suitable one.","PeriodicalId":6474,"journal":{"name":"2017 10th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI)","volume":"34 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statolith-based species identification methods for ommastrephidae species\",\"authors\":\"Z. Fang, Xinjun Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CISP-BMEI.2017.8302015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Statoliths are a pair of calcareous structures which can provide biological and ecological information for cephalopods. Understanding their shape will help us know the taxonomy of cephalopods, even to the species level. Ommastrephes bartramii, Dosidicus gigas and Illex argentinus are chosen to compare the shape of their statolith as a means of species identification because of their ecological importance to the marine ecosystems. The results show that D. gigas has a relatively large sized statolith and I. argentinus has the smallest. The four main parts of the statolith (dorsal dome, lateral dome, rostrum and wing) in the different species were diverse and distinguishable. The traditional method effectively separated the three species of statolith with high classification rates (92.0%–100%) by six morphology variables. The outline method produced a relatively low classification rate (73.4%–94.2%) using six harmonic numbers and stepwise discriminant analysis (SDA). The result in this study demonstrates that traditional method would achieve a better performance when the species are not so closely related phylogenetically, and outline method is more suitable for the statolith identification at the genus level. It is necessary to compare other cephalopod statoliths by different methods and find a suitable one.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 10th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI)\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 10th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CISP-BMEI.2017.8302015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 10th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CISP-BMEI.2017.8302015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

静纹石是一对钙质结构,可为头足类动物提供生物学和生态学信息。了解它们的形状将有助于我们了解头足类动物的分类,甚至是物种的分类。由于它们对海洋生态系统的生态重要性,选择了Ommastrephes bartramii, Dosidicus gigas和Illex argentinus来比较它们的statstatite形状作为物种鉴定的手段。结果表明,巨蛙的石纹较大,阿根廷石纹最小。不同种属的静石岩的4个主要部分(背穹窿、侧穹窿、喙部和翼部)具有多样性和可区分性。传统方法通过6个形态变量有效地分离出3种statolite,分类率高达92.0% ~ 100%。轮廓法采用6次谐波数和逐步判别分析(SDA),分类率较低(73.4% ~ 94.2%)。本研究结果表明,当物种系统亲缘关系不密切时,传统方法能获得更好的鉴定效果,而轮廓法更适合于属水平的statolite鉴定。有必要用不同的方法比较其他头足类的静态石,找到合适的一种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Statolith-based species identification methods for ommastrephidae species
Statoliths are a pair of calcareous structures which can provide biological and ecological information for cephalopods. Understanding their shape will help us know the taxonomy of cephalopods, even to the species level. Ommastrephes bartramii, Dosidicus gigas and Illex argentinus are chosen to compare the shape of their statolith as a means of species identification because of their ecological importance to the marine ecosystems. The results show that D. gigas has a relatively large sized statolith and I. argentinus has the smallest. The four main parts of the statolith (dorsal dome, lateral dome, rostrum and wing) in the different species were diverse and distinguishable. The traditional method effectively separated the three species of statolith with high classification rates (92.0%–100%) by six morphology variables. The outline method produced a relatively low classification rate (73.4%–94.2%) using six harmonic numbers and stepwise discriminant analysis (SDA). The result in this study demonstrates that traditional method would achieve a better performance when the species are not so closely related phylogenetically, and outline method is more suitable for the statolith identification at the genus level. It is necessary to compare other cephalopod statoliths by different methods and find a suitable one.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信