以槽型万古霉素治疗血液透析患者曲线下靶面积的评价。

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
F. Keshavarzi, Vithyah Nadaraja, Aliza Alias, M. Farrukh, C. S. Yap
{"title":"以槽型万古霉素治疗血液透析患者曲线下靶面积的评价。","authors":"F. Keshavarzi, Vithyah Nadaraja, Aliza Alias, M. Farrukh, C. S. Yap","doi":"10.22146/ijp.4433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Objectives: Recently published IDSA guidelines on vancomycin dosing no longer advocates the use of trough concentrations as surrogate markers for clinical efficacy.  Protocols developed prior to revised targets may not reflect to the true efficacy marker for vancomycin that is AUC/MIC 400-600. This study aimed to evaluate the local vancomycin dosing protocol in achieving the target trough concentration and extrapolated AUC/MIC of 400-600 in patients with haemodialysis. \nMethods: A retrospective analysis of therapeutic drug monitoring forms and individual medical records of haemodialysis patients was conducted. Vancomycin AUC of each individual was extrapolated via the use of a pharmacokinetic modelling software, PrecisePK®. Chi-square test of independence was used to determine the association of factors affecting AUC/MIC. A p value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. \nResults: A total number of 80 haemodialysis-dependent cases who were on vancomycin were recruited. More than 62% of haemodialysis patients showed AUC/MIC > 800. AUC/MIC was heavily influenced by minimum inhibitory concentration of the infecting microorganism. Interpretation & Conclusions: Exclusive trough-guided dosing may not translate well in achieving clinical efficacy of vancomycin in haemodialysis patients. Other contributing factors, especially MIC should be factored, as small MIC values account for greater reciprocal AUC/MIC values that increase the risk of loss of residual kidney function; a factor which is associated with overall mortality of HD patients.","PeriodicalId":13520,"journal":{"name":"INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of trough-based vancomycin therapy in achieving targeted area under the curve in haemodialysis cases.\",\"authors\":\"F. Keshavarzi, Vithyah Nadaraja, Aliza Alias, M. Farrukh, C. S. Yap\",\"doi\":\"10.22146/ijp.4433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background & Objectives: Recently published IDSA guidelines on vancomycin dosing no longer advocates the use of trough concentrations as surrogate markers for clinical efficacy.  Protocols developed prior to revised targets may not reflect to the true efficacy marker for vancomycin that is AUC/MIC 400-600. This study aimed to evaluate the local vancomycin dosing protocol in achieving the target trough concentration and extrapolated AUC/MIC of 400-600 in patients with haemodialysis. \\nMethods: A retrospective analysis of therapeutic drug monitoring forms and individual medical records of haemodialysis patients was conducted. Vancomycin AUC of each individual was extrapolated via the use of a pharmacokinetic modelling software, PrecisePK®. Chi-square test of independence was used to determine the association of factors affecting AUC/MIC. A p value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. \\nResults: A total number of 80 haemodialysis-dependent cases who were on vancomycin were recruited. More than 62% of haemodialysis patients showed AUC/MIC > 800. AUC/MIC was heavily influenced by minimum inhibitory concentration of the infecting microorganism. Interpretation & Conclusions: Exclusive trough-guided dosing may not translate well in achieving clinical efficacy of vancomycin in haemodialysis patients. Other contributing factors, especially MIC should be factored, as small MIC values account for greater reciprocal AUC/MIC values that increase the risk of loss of residual kidney function; a factor which is associated with overall mortality of HD patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22146/ijp.4433\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/ijp.4433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:最近出版的IDSA万古霉素剂量指南不再提倡使用谷浓度作为临床疗效的替代指标。在修订目标之前制定的方案可能不能反映万古霉素的真实疗效指标,即AUC/MIC 400-600。本研究旨在评估万古霉素局部给药方案在血液透析患者中实现目标谷浓度和外推的AUC/MIC为400-600的效果。方法:对血液透析患者治疗药物监测表及个人病历进行回顾性分析。通过使用药代动力学建模软件PrecisePK®推断每个个体的万古霉素AUC。采用独立性卡方检验确定影响AUC/MIC因素的相关性。p值为0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:共纳入血液透析依赖万古霉素患者80例。超过62%的血液透析患者AUC/MIC > 800。感染微生物的最小抑菌浓度对AUC/MIC影响较大。解释与结论:万古霉素在血液透析患者中单独采用通道引导给药可能不能很好地转化为临床疗效。其他影响因素,尤其是MIC也应考虑在内,因为较小的MIC值会导致更大的AUC/MIC值的倒数,从而增加剩余肾功能丧失的风险;这一因素与HD患者的总死亡率有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of trough-based vancomycin therapy in achieving targeted area under the curve in haemodialysis cases.
Background & Objectives: Recently published IDSA guidelines on vancomycin dosing no longer advocates the use of trough concentrations as surrogate markers for clinical efficacy.  Protocols developed prior to revised targets may not reflect to the true efficacy marker for vancomycin that is AUC/MIC 400-600. This study aimed to evaluate the local vancomycin dosing protocol in achieving the target trough concentration and extrapolated AUC/MIC of 400-600 in patients with haemodialysis. Methods: A retrospective analysis of therapeutic drug monitoring forms and individual medical records of haemodialysis patients was conducted. Vancomycin AUC of each individual was extrapolated via the use of a pharmacokinetic modelling software, PrecisePK®. Chi-square test of independence was used to determine the association of factors affecting AUC/MIC. A p value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total number of 80 haemodialysis-dependent cases who were on vancomycin were recruited. More than 62% of haemodialysis patients showed AUC/MIC > 800. AUC/MIC was heavily influenced by minimum inhibitory concentration of the infecting microorganism. Interpretation & Conclusions: Exclusive trough-guided dosing may not translate well in achieving clinical efficacy of vancomycin in haemodialysis patients. Other contributing factors, especially MIC should be factored, as small MIC values account for greater reciprocal AUC/MIC values that increase the risk of loss of residual kidney function; a factor which is associated with overall mortality of HD patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY
INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal had been established in 1972, and online publication was begun in 2008. Since 2012, the journal has been published in English by Faculty of Pharmacy Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM) Yogyakarta Indonesia in collaboration with IAI (Ikatan Apoteker Indonesia or Indonesian Pharmacist Association) and only receives manuscripts in English. Indonesian Journal of Pharmacy is Accredited by Directorate General of Higher Education. The journal includes various fields of pharmaceuticals sciences such as: -Pharmacology and Toxicology -Pharmacokinetics -Community and Clinical Pharmacy -Pharmaceutical Chemistry -Pharmaceutical Biology -Pharmaceutics -Pharmaceutical Technology -Biopharmaceutics -Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Biotechnology -Alternative medicines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信