赫拉克利特在尼采的《巴塞尔演讲:历史哲学的重建》中

Q3 Arts and Humanities
G. V. Biserov
{"title":"赫拉克利特在尼采的《巴塞尔演讲:历史哲学的重建》中","authors":"G. V. Biserov","doi":"10.21146/2074-5869-2022-27-1-47-53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents a brief reconstruction of the genesis of Nietzsche’s Basel lecture on Heraclitus and an analysis of its key features in comparison to other Nietzsche’s early texts that dedicated to Heraclitus. Hermeneutical and historical approach used in the paper allows to raise the question about the foundations of Nietzsche’s interpretation of Heraclitus. I review Nietzsche’s contemporary sources and interpretations of Heraclitean philosophy in many cases significantly different from those on which contemporary researchers of Heraclitus rely. I show that the Basel lectures rather than Nietzsche’s minor writings on the Greeks appear to be the key element in forming Nietzsche’s views on Heraclitus.","PeriodicalId":53558,"journal":{"name":"History of Philosophy Quarterly","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heraclitus in Nietzsche’s Basel Lectures: A Historical-Philosophical Reconstruction\",\"authors\":\"G. V. Biserov\",\"doi\":\"10.21146/2074-5869-2022-27-1-47-53\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper presents a brief reconstruction of the genesis of Nietzsche’s Basel lecture on Heraclitus and an analysis of its key features in comparison to other Nietzsche’s early texts that dedicated to Heraclitus. Hermeneutical and historical approach used in the paper allows to raise the question about the foundations of Nietzsche’s interpretation of Heraclitus. I review Nietzsche’s contemporary sources and interpretations of Heraclitean philosophy in many cases significantly different from those on which contemporary researchers of Heraclitus rely. I show that the Basel lectures rather than Nietzsche’s minor writings on the Greeks appear to be the key element in forming Nietzsche’s views on Heraclitus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Philosophy Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Philosophy Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-5869-2022-27-1-47-53\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Philosophy Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-5869-2022-27-1-47-53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文简要地重建了尼采关于赫拉克利特的巴塞尔演讲的起源,并分析了其与尼采早期致力于赫拉克利特的其他文本相比的关键特征。本文使用的解释学和历史方法可以提出尼采对赫拉克利特解释的基础问题。我回顾了尼采对赫拉克利特哲学的当代来源和解释,在许多情况下,与当代赫拉克利特研究者所依赖的有很大不同。我指出,形成尼采对赫拉克利特观点的关键因素,似乎是巴塞尔讲座,而不是尼采关于希腊人的次要著作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Heraclitus in Nietzsche’s Basel Lectures: A Historical-Philosophical Reconstruction
The paper presents a brief reconstruction of the genesis of Nietzsche’s Basel lecture on Heraclitus and an analysis of its key features in comparison to other Nietzsche’s early texts that dedicated to Heraclitus. Hermeneutical and historical approach used in the paper allows to raise the question about the foundations of Nietzsche’s interpretation of Heraclitus. I review Nietzsche’s contemporary sources and interpretations of Heraclitean philosophy in many cases significantly different from those on which contemporary researchers of Heraclitus rely. I show that the Basel lectures rather than Nietzsche’s minor writings on the Greeks appear to be the key element in forming Nietzsche’s views on Heraclitus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
History of Philosophy Quarterly
History of Philosophy Quarterly Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信