Mandy Wang, A. Kirby, E. Gibbs, B. Gidaszewski, M. Khajehei, S. Chua
{"title":"全宫颈扩张剖宫产与中腔辅助分娩后妊娠早产的风险比较","authors":"Mandy Wang, A. Kirby, E. Gibbs, B. Gidaszewski, M. Khajehei, S. Chua","doi":"10.1111/ajo.13058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Expediting delivery in the second stage of labour often involves a choice between a caesarean section at full dilatation or mid‐cavity instrumental delivery. Accumulating evidence suggests that the mode of delivery may influence the risk of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy.","PeriodicalId":8599,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy following caesarean section at full cervical dilatation compared with mid‐cavity instrumental delivery\",\"authors\":\"Mandy Wang, A. Kirby, E. Gibbs, B. Gidaszewski, M. Khajehei, S. Chua\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajo.13058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Expediting delivery in the second stage of labour often involves a choice between a caesarean section at full dilatation or mid‐cavity instrumental delivery. Accumulating evidence suggests that the mode of delivery may influence the risk of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Risk of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy following caesarean section at full cervical dilatation compared with mid‐cavity instrumental delivery
Expediting delivery in the second stage of labour often involves a choice between a caesarean section at full dilatation or mid‐cavity instrumental delivery. Accumulating evidence suggests that the mode of delivery may influence the risk of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy.