M. Abouzari, Donald Tan, B. Sarna, Y. Ghavami, K. Goshtasbi, Erica M Parker, Harrison W. Lin, H. Djalilian
{"title":"多模式偏头痛预防治疗对听觉亢进患者的疗效观察","authors":"M. Abouzari, Donald Tan, B. Sarna, Y. Ghavami, K. Goshtasbi, Erica M Parker, Harrison W. Lin, H. Djalilian","doi":"10.1177/0003489419892997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of a multi-modal migraine prophylaxis therapy for patients with hyperacusis. Methods: In a prospective cohort, patients with hyperacusis were treated with a multi-modal step-wise migraine prophylactic regimen (nortriptyline, verapamil, topiramate, or a combination thereof) as well as lifestyle and dietary modifications. Pre- and post-treatment average loudness discomfort level (LDL), hyperacusis discomfort level measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS), and scores on the modified Khalfa questionnaire for severity of hyperacusis were compared. Results: Twenty-two of the 25 patients (88%) reported subjective resolution of their symptoms following treatment. Post-treatment audiograms showed significant improvement in average LDL from 81.3 ± 3.2 dB to 86.4 ± 2.6 dB (P < .001), indicating increased sound tolerability. The VAS discomfort level also showed significant improvement from a pre-treatment average of 7.7 ± 1.1 to 3.7 ± 1.6 post-treatment (P < .001). There was also significant improvement in the average total score on modified Khalfa questionnaire (32.2 ± 3.6 vs 22.0 ± 5.7, P < .001). Conclusions: The majority of patients with hyperacusis demonstrated symptomatic improvement from migraine prophylaxis therapy, as indicated by self-reported and audiometric measures. Our findings indicate that, for some patients, hyperacusis may share a pathophysiologic basis with migraine disorder and may be successfully managed with multimodal migraine prophylaxis therapy.","PeriodicalId":8361,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology","volume":"23 1","pages":"421 - 427"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Multi-Modal Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy on Hyperacusis Patients\",\"authors\":\"M. Abouzari, Donald Tan, B. Sarna, Y. Ghavami, K. Goshtasbi, Erica M Parker, Harrison W. Lin, H. Djalilian\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0003489419892997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of a multi-modal migraine prophylaxis therapy for patients with hyperacusis. Methods: In a prospective cohort, patients with hyperacusis were treated with a multi-modal step-wise migraine prophylactic regimen (nortriptyline, verapamil, topiramate, or a combination thereof) as well as lifestyle and dietary modifications. Pre- and post-treatment average loudness discomfort level (LDL), hyperacusis discomfort level measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS), and scores on the modified Khalfa questionnaire for severity of hyperacusis were compared. Results: Twenty-two of the 25 patients (88%) reported subjective resolution of their symptoms following treatment. Post-treatment audiograms showed significant improvement in average LDL from 81.3 ± 3.2 dB to 86.4 ± 2.6 dB (P < .001), indicating increased sound tolerability. The VAS discomfort level also showed significant improvement from a pre-treatment average of 7.7 ± 1.1 to 3.7 ± 1.6 post-treatment (P < .001). There was also significant improvement in the average total score on modified Khalfa questionnaire (32.2 ± 3.6 vs 22.0 ± 5.7, P < .001). Conclusions: The majority of patients with hyperacusis demonstrated symptomatic improvement from migraine prophylaxis therapy, as indicated by self-reported and audiometric measures. Our findings indicate that, for some patients, hyperacusis may share a pathophysiologic basis with migraine disorder and may be successfully managed with multimodal migraine prophylaxis therapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"421 - 427\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489419892997\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489419892997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
摘要
目的:评价多模式偏头痛预防治疗对听觉亢进患者的疗效。方法:在一项前瞻性队列研究中,使用多模式循序渐进的偏头痛预防方案(去甲替林、维拉帕米、托吡酯或其组合)以及改变生活方式和饮食习惯来治疗耳聋患者。比较治疗前和治疗后的平均响度不适水平(LDL)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量的听觉亢进不适水平和改进的Khalfa听力亢进严重程度问卷得分。结果:25例患者中有22例(88%)在治疗后主观症状得到缓解。治疗后的听音图显示,平均LDL从81.3±3.2 dB显著改善到86.4±2.6 dB (P < 0.001),表明声音耐受性增加。VAS不适感评分也由治疗前平均7.7±1.1分显著改善至治疗后平均3.7±1.6分(P < 0.001)。改良Khalfa问卷的平均总分(32.2±3.6 vs 22.0±5.7,P < 0.001)也有显著改善。结论:正如自我报告和听力测量所表明的那样,大多数偏头痛预防治疗的患者表现出症状改善。我们的研究结果表明,对于一些患者来说,耳鸣可能与偏头痛有共同的病理生理基础,可以通过多模式偏头痛预防治疗成功地控制。
Efficacy of Multi-Modal Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy on Hyperacusis Patients
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of a multi-modal migraine prophylaxis therapy for patients with hyperacusis. Methods: In a prospective cohort, patients with hyperacusis were treated with a multi-modal step-wise migraine prophylactic regimen (nortriptyline, verapamil, topiramate, or a combination thereof) as well as lifestyle and dietary modifications. Pre- and post-treatment average loudness discomfort level (LDL), hyperacusis discomfort level measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS), and scores on the modified Khalfa questionnaire for severity of hyperacusis were compared. Results: Twenty-two of the 25 patients (88%) reported subjective resolution of their symptoms following treatment. Post-treatment audiograms showed significant improvement in average LDL from 81.3 ± 3.2 dB to 86.4 ± 2.6 dB (P < .001), indicating increased sound tolerability. The VAS discomfort level also showed significant improvement from a pre-treatment average of 7.7 ± 1.1 to 3.7 ± 1.6 post-treatment (P < .001). There was also significant improvement in the average total score on modified Khalfa questionnaire (32.2 ± 3.6 vs 22.0 ± 5.7, P < .001). Conclusions: The majority of patients with hyperacusis demonstrated symptomatic improvement from migraine prophylaxis therapy, as indicated by self-reported and audiometric measures. Our findings indicate that, for some patients, hyperacusis may share a pathophysiologic basis with migraine disorder and may be successfully managed with multimodal migraine prophylaxis therapy.