5G系统中超可靠低延迟通信的信道编码

Michał Sybis, K. Wesołowski, Keeth Jayasinghe, V. Venkatasubramanian, V. Vukadinovic
{"title":"5G系统中超可靠低延迟通信的信道编码","authors":"Michał Sybis, K. Wesołowski, Keeth Jayasinghe, V. Venkatasubramanian, V. Vukadinovic","doi":"10.1109/VTCFall.2016.7880930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates block error rate (BLER) performance and computational complexity of candidate channel coding schemes for ultra-reliable low latency communication (URLLC) in 5G. The considered candidates are the same as those identified in 3GPP: turbo, LDPC, polar, and convolutional codes. Details of code constructions and decoding algorithms are provided with computational complexity analysis. Code construction parameters, number of iterations, and list sizes are selected to provide a fair comparison among candidate coding schemes. Simulation results on BLER are shown for several code rates and small-to-moderate block sizes. The results reveal that polar and LDPC codes outperform turbo codes for short block sizes of 40 bits, while the opposite is true for medium block sizes of 200 bits. None of the schemes is a clear winner at all considered block sizes and coding rates. Other aspects like implementation complexity, latency, and flexibility will also be important when deciding the URLLC coding scheme.","PeriodicalId":6484,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 84th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"139","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Channel Coding for Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication in 5G Systems\",\"authors\":\"Michał Sybis, K. Wesołowski, Keeth Jayasinghe, V. Venkatasubramanian, V. Vukadinovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/VTCFall.2016.7880930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates block error rate (BLER) performance and computational complexity of candidate channel coding schemes for ultra-reliable low latency communication (URLLC) in 5G. The considered candidates are the same as those identified in 3GPP: turbo, LDPC, polar, and convolutional codes. Details of code constructions and decoding algorithms are provided with computational complexity analysis. Code construction parameters, number of iterations, and list sizes are selected to provide a fair comparison among candidate coding schemes. Simulation results on BLER are shown for several code rates and small-to-moderate block sizes. The results reveal that polar and LDPC codes outperform turbo codes for short block sizes of 40 bits, while the opposite is true for medium block sizes of 200 bits. None of the schemes is a clear winner at all considered block sizes and coding rates. Other aspects like implementation complexity, latency, and flexibility will also be important when deciding the URLLC coding scheme.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE 84th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"139\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE 84th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/VTCFall.2016.7880930\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 84th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VTCFall.2016.7880930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 139

摘要

研究了5G超可靠低延迟通信(URLLC)候选信道编码方案的块错误率(BLER)性能和计算复杂度。考虑的候选代码与3GPP中确定的相同:turbo、LDPC、polar和卷积代码。详细的代码结构和解码算法提供了计算复杂度分析。选择代码构造参数、迭代次数和列表大小是为了在候选编码方案之间提供公平的比较。在BLER上显示了几种码率和小到中等块大小的仿真结果。结果表明,极性和LDPC码在40位的短块大小上优于turbo码,而在200位的中等块大小上则相反。考虑到块大小和编码速率,没有一个方案是明显的赢家。在决定URLLC编码方案时,实现复杂性、延迟和灵活性等其他方面也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Channel Coding for Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication in 5G Systems
This paper investigates block error rate (BLER) performance and computational complexity of candidate channel coding schemes for ultra-reliable low latency communication (URLLC) in 5G. The considered candidates are the same as those identified in 3GPP: turbo, LDPC, polar, and convolutional codes. Details of code constructions and decoding algorithms are provided with computational complexity analysis. Code construction parameters, number of iterations, and list sizes are selected to provide a fair comparison among candidate coding schemes. Simulation results on BLER are shown for several code rates and small-to-moderate block sizes. The results reveal that polar and LDPC codes outperform turbo codes for short block sizes of 40 bits, while the opposite is true for medium block sizes of 200 bits. None of the schemes is a clear winner at all considered block sizes and coding rates. Other aspects like implementation complexity, latency, and flexibility will also be important when deciding the URLLC coding scheme.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信