非洲疫苗监管论坛(AVAREF)在西非大流行期间加速埃博拉候选疫苗临床评估中的作用

Bartholomew Dicky Akanmori, David Mukanga, Ahmed Bellah, Tieble Traore, Michael Ward, Richard Mihigo
{"title":"非洲疫苗监管论坛(AVAREF)在西非大流行期间加速埃博拉候选疫苗临床评估中的作用","authors":"Bartholomew Dicky Akanmori, David Mukanga, Ahmed Bellah, Tieble Traore, Michael Ward, Richard Mihigo","doi":"10.29245/2578-3009/2018/si.1111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In emergency situations, clinical trials of new vaccines and therapies in resource-constrained settings place an additional burden on the limited resources of low and middle-income countries. The clinical trials of vaccines against Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) in Africa presented challenges on how to ensure there was enough capacity for ethics and regulatory reviews and oversight while still allowing for accelerating the clinical evaluations. Using the African Vaccine Regulatory Forum (AVAREF) platform WHO supported African countries to provide ethics and regulatory reviews and oversight, ensuring that these trials were completed in unprecedented shorter timelines than normal, that is, months instead of years. Pathways were defined, external expertise provided and appropriate review models implemented in the countries which hosted these critical studies. This paper discusses the work around the clinical trials, the models of reviews and timelines for clinical trials and highlights the important lessons revealed. More investments are required to monitor safety during clinical trials, strengthen systems for licensure of new products and implement robust post-marketing surveillance, among other components for effective clinical trials before the next pandemic surfaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":73785,"journal":{"name":"Journal of immunological sciences","volume":"2016 1","pages":"75-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7617095/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of The African Vaccine Regulatory Forum (AVAREF) in The Accelerated Clinical Evaluation of Ebola Vaccine Candidates During the Large West Africa Epidemic.\",\"authors\":\"Bartholomew Dicky Akanmori, David Mukanga, Ahmed Bellah, Tieble Traore, Michael Ward, Richard Mihigo\",\"doi\":\"10.29245/2578-3009/2018/si.1111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In emergency situations, clinical trials of new vaccines and therapies in resource-constrained settings place an additional burden on the limited resources of low and middle-income countries. The clinical trials of vaccines against Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) in Africa presented challenges on how to ensure there was enough capacity for ethics and regulatory reviews and oversight while still allowing for accelerating the clinical evaluations. Using the African Vaccine Regulatory Forum (AVAREF) platform WHO supported African countries to provide ethics and regulatory reviews and oversight, ensuring that these trials were completed in unprecedented shorter timelines than normal, that is, months instead of years. Pathways were defined, external expertise provided and appropriate review models implemented in the countries which hosted these critical studies. This paper discusses the work around the clinical trials, the models of reviews and timelines for clinical trials and highlights the important lessons revealed. More investments are required to monitor safety during clinical trials, strengthen systems for licensure of new products and implement robust post-marketing surveillance, among other components for effective clinical trials before the next pandemic surfaces.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of immunological sciences\",\"volume\":\"2016 1\",\"pages\":\"75-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7617095/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of immunological sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29245/2578-3009/2018/si.1111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of immunological sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29245/2578-3009/2018/si.1111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在紧急情况下,在资源有限的情况下对新疫苗和疗法进行临床试验,给低收入和中等收入国家有限的资源增加了额外负担。在非洲对埃博拉病毒病疫苗进行的临床试验提出了挑战,即如何确保有足够的能力进行伦理和监管审查和监督,同时仍然允许加速临床评价。世卫组织利用非洲疫苗监管论坛(AVAREF)平台,支持非洲国家提供伦理和监管审查和监督,确保在比正常情况更短的时间内(即几个月而不是几年)完成这些试验。确定了途径,提供了外部专门知识,并在主办这些重要研究的国家实施了适当的审查模式。本文讨论了围绕临床试验的工作、临床试验的评审模式和时间表,并强调了从中得到的重要教训。需要更多的投资来监测临床试验期间的安全性,加强新产品的许可制度,实施强有力的上市后监测,以及在下一次大流行出现之前进行有效临床试验的其他内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of The African Vaccine Regulatory Forum (AVAREF) in The Accelerated Clinical Evaluation of Ebola Vaccine Candidates During the Large West Africa Epidemic.

In emergency situations, clinical trials of new vaccines and therapies in resource-constrained settings place an additional burden on the limited resources of low and middle-income countries. The clinical trials of vaccines against Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) in Africa presented challenges on how to ensure there was enough capacity for ethics and regulatory reviews and oversight while still allowing for accelerating the clinical evaluations. Using the African Vaccine Regulatory Forum (AVAREF) platform WHO supported African countries to provide ethics and regulatory reviews and oversight, ensuring that these trials were completed in unprecedented shorter timelines than normal, that is, months instead of years. Pathways were defined, external expertise provided and appropriate review models implemented in the countries which hosted these critical studies. This paper discusses the work around the clinical trials, the models of reviews and timelines for clinical trials and highlights the important lessons revealed. More investments are required to monitor safety during clinical trials, strengthen systems for licensure of new products and implement robust post-marketing surveillance, among other components for effective clinical trials before the next pandemic surfaces.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信