墨西哥的事实核查。公众对verified 2018的看法分析

Galarza Molina, Rocío Araceli
{"title":"墨西哥的事实核查。公众对verified 2018的看法分析","authors":"Galarza Molina, Rocío Araceli","doi":"10.22201/fcpys.24484911e.2020.29.70352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies the fact-checking initiative in Mexico, Verificado 2018, with the goal of assessing the public’s reaction to this project. A thematic analysis of the comments of readers published on the Verificado 2018 web page ( N = 947) was conducted. Results indicate that the public identifies Verificado 2018 as a journalistic project, and contextualizes it in an environment of threats to democracy. Thus, a sector of the public expresses distrust in the initiative, while another celebrates its usefulness. In addition, in its interaction with Verificado 2018, the public became involved as co-creator, suggesting content to verify. This work emphasizes the role of audience interpretation in the credibility and usefulness of a fact-checking project, as well as in the search for solutions to the disinformation phenomenon.","PeriodicalId":101117,"journal":{"name":"Revista Mexicana de Opinión Pública","volume":"70 1","pages":"41-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fact-Checking en México. Análisis de la percepción del público de Verificado 2018\",\"authors\":\"Galarza Molina, Rocío Araceli\",\"doi\":\"10.22201/fcpys.24484911e.2020.29.70352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper studies the fact-checking initiative in Mexico, Verificado 2018, with the goal of assessing the public’s reaction to this project. A thematic analysis of the comments of readers published on the Verificado 2018 web page ( N = 947) was conducted. Results indicate that the public identifies Verificado 2018 as a journalistic project, and contextualizes it in an environment of threats to democracy. Thus, a sector of the public expresses distrust in the initiative, while another celebrates its usefulness. In addition, in its interaction with Verificado 2018, the public became involved as co-creator, suggesting content to verify. This work emphasizes the role of audience interpretation in the credibility and usefulness of a fact-checking project, as well as in the search for solutions to the disinformation phenomenon.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Mexicana de Opinión Pública\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"41-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Mexicana de Opinión Pública\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.24484911e.2020.29.70352\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Mexicana de Opinión Pública","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.24484911e.2020.29.70352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文研究了墨西哥的事实核查倡议Verificado 2018,目的是评估公众对该项目的反应。对Verificado 2018网站(N = 947)上发表的读者评论进行专题分析。结果表明,公众将Verificado 2018视为一个新闻项目,并将其置于民主受到威胁的环境中。因此,一部分公众对这一倡议表示不信任,而另一部分人则称赞它的有用性。此外,在与Verificado 2018的互动中,公众作为共同创作者参与其中,提出需要验证的内容。这项工作强调了受众解释在事实核查项目的可信度和有用性中的作用,以及在寻找虚假信息现象的解决方案中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fact-Checking en México. Análisis de la percepción del público de Verificado 2018
This paper studies the fact-checking initiative in Mexico, Verificado 2018, with the goal of assessing the public’s reaction to this project. A thematic analysis of the comments of readers published on the Verificado 2018 web page ( N = 947) was conducted. Results indicate that the public identifies Verificado 2018 as a journalistic project, and contextualizes it in an environment of threats to democracy. Thus, a sector of the public expresses distrust in the initiative, while another celebrates its usefulness. In addition, in its interaction with Verificado 2018, the public became involved as co-creator, suggesting content to verify. This work emphasizes the role of audience interpretation in the credibility and usefulness of a fact-checking project, as well as in the search for solutions to the disinformation phenomenon.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信