{"title":"墨西哥的事实核查。公众对verified 2018的看法分析","authors":"Galarza Molina, Rocío Araceli","doi":"10.22201/fcpys.24484911e.2020.29.70352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies the fact-checking initiative in Mexico, Verificado 2018, with the goal of assessing the public’s reaction to this project. A thematic analysis of the comments of readers published on the Verificado 2018 web page ( N = 947) was conducted. Results indicate that the public identifies Verificado 2018 as a journalistic project, and contextualizes it in an environment of threats to democracy. Thus, a sector of the public expresses distrust in the initiative, while another celebrates its usefulness. In addition, in its interaction with Verificado 2018, the public became involved as co-creator, suggesting content to verify. This work emphasizes the role of audience interpretation in the credibility and usefulness of a fact-checking project, as well as in the search for solutions to the disinformation phenomenon.","PeriodicalId":101117,"journal":{"name":"Revista Mexicana de Opinión Pública","volume":"70 1","pages":"41-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fact-Checking en México. Análisis de la percepción del público de Verificado 2018\",\"authors\":\"Galarza Molina, Rocío Araceli\",\"doi\":\"10.22201/fcpys.24484911e.2020.29.70352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper studies the fact-checking initiative in Mexico, Verificado 2018, with the goal of assessing the public’s reaction to this project. A thematic analysis of the comments of readers published on the Verificado 2018 web page ( N = 947) was conducted. Results indicate that the public identifies Verificado 2018 as a journalistic project, and contextualizes it in an environment of threats to democracy. Thus, a sector of the public expresses distrust in the initiative, while another celebrates its usefulness. In addition, in its interaction with Verificado 2018, the public became involved as co-creator, suggesting content to verify. This work emphasizes the role of audience interpretation in the credibility and usefulness of a fact-checking project, as well as in the search for solutions to the disinformation phenomenon.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Mexicana de Opinión Pública\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"41-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Mexicana de Opinión Pública\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.24484911e.2020.29.70352\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Mexicana de Opinión Pública","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.24484911e.2020.29.70352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fact-Checking en México. Análisis de la percepción del público de Verificado 2018
This paper studies the fact-checking initiative in Mexico, Verificado 2018, with the goal of assessing the public’s reaction to this project. A thematic analysis of the comments of readers published on the Verificado 2018 web page ( N = 947) was conducted. Results indicate that the public identifies Verificado 2018 as a journalistic project, and contextualizes it in an environment of threats to democracy. Thus, a sector of the public expresses distrust in the initiative, while another celebrates its usefulness. In addition, in its interaction with Verificado 2018, the public became involved as co-creator, suggesting content to verify. This work emphasizes the role of audience interpretation in the credibility and usefulness of a fact-checking project, as well as in the search for solutions to the disinformation phenomenon.