管理者的安全态度作为组织因素和压力设备风险预测因子。

IF 2.4 3区工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL

Cognition Technology & Work Pub Date : 2022-05-11 DOI:10.3233/wor-210373

T. Golubović, V. S. Brkic, Martina Perišić

{"title":"管理者的安全态度作为组织因素和压力设备风险预测因子。","authors":"T. Golubović, V. S. Brkic, Martina Perišić","doi":"10.3233/wor-210373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nChange in current approach to develop methodologies for process risk assessment, where it is commenced from the process industry and exclusively hazardous materials are dealt with, into the approach where it will be commenced from pressure equipment within any context and both technical and organizational aspects are considered, can lead to the orientation of a more comprehensive approach to risk assessment, and thereby to better results in this area.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nThe goal of this study implies the creation of a universal measurement instrument that will measure and quantify organizational factors impact on the risk of pressure equipment exploitation.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe research instrument was drawn from previous research and tested by the multivariate statistical methods using the sample size of 253.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe confirmatory factor analysis conducted shows that the most influencing organizational factor is 'subcontractors for works from other enterprises' with maximum value of 104, whereas the factors 'maintenance/inspection', 'safety and health at work' and 'human error' are by 10% to 20% less influencing. There then follow 'training and competence of employees for crisis situations', communication', 'potentially hazardous materials and equipment' and 'organizational change management' and the factor 'conducting investigation after accidents' with the lowest value of 29. Pareto analysis indicates that the factors 'communication', 'subcontractors for works from other enterprises', 'organizational changes management', 'potentially hazardous materials and equipment', and 'training and competence of employees for crisis situations' participate with 80%, and they should be given special attention in practice.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe instrument offered can ensure proactive information on the influence of organizational factors as risk predictors of pressure equipment operation, before given influences lead to accidents with severe consequences.","PeriodicalId":49090,"journal":{"name":"Cognition Technology & Work","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managers safety attitudes as organizational factors and pressure equipment risk predictor.\",\"authors\":\"T. Golubović, V. S. Brkic, Martina Perišić\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/wor-210373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nChange in current approach to develop methodologies for process risk assessment, where it is commenced from the process industry and exclusively hazardous materials are dealt with, into the approach where it will be commenced from pressure equipment within any context and both technical and organizational aspects are considered, can lead to the orientation of a more comprehensive approach to risk assessment, and thereby to better results in this area.\\n\\n\\nOBJECTIVE\\nThe goal of this study implies the creation of a universal measurement instrument that will measure and quantify organizational factors impact on the risk of pressure equipment exploitation.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nThe research instrument was drawn from previous research and tested by the multivariate statistical methods using the sample size of 253.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThe confirmatory factor analysis conducted shows that the most influencing organizational factor is 'subcontractors for works from other enterprises' with maximum value of 104, whereas the factors 'maintenance/inspection', 'safety and health at work' and 'human error' are by 10% to 20% less influencing. There then follow 'training and competence of employees for crisis situations', communication', 'potentially hazardous materials and equipment' and 'organizational change management' and the factor 'conducting investigation after accidents' with the lowest value of 29. Pareto analysis indicates that the factors 'communication', 'subcontractors for works from other enterprises', 'organizational changes management', 'potentially hazardous materials and equipment', and 'training and competence of employees for crisis situations' participate with 80%, and they should be given special attention in practice.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nThe instrument offered can ensure proactive information on the influence of organizational factors as risk predictors of pressure equipment operation, before given influences lead to accidents with severe consequences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognition Technology & Work\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognition Technology & Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-210373\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition Technology & Work","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-210373","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前的过程风险评估方法的发展方法，从过程工业开始，只处理有害物质，转变为在任何环境下从压力设备开始，并考虑技术和组织方面，可以导致更全面的风险评估方法的方向，从而在这一领域取得更好的结果。目的:本研究的目标是创建一种通用的测量仪器，以测量和量化组织因素对压力设备开发风险的影响。方法采用前人研究的方法，采用多元统计方法进行检验，样本量为253例。结果验证性因子分析表明，组织因子中影响最大的是“其他企业的分包商”，其影响最大值为104，而“维修/检查”、“工作安全与健康”和“人为失误”的影响比“其他企业的分包商”小10% ~ 20%。其次是“员工应对危机的培训和能力”、“沟通”、“潜在危险材料和设备”、“组织变革管理”和“事故后调查”，得分最低，为29分。帕累托分析表明，“沟通”、“其他企业工程的分包商”、“组织变革管理”、“潜在危险材料和设备”、“危机情况下员工的培训和能力”等因素参与了80%，在实践中应给予特别关注。结论所提供的仪器可以确保在组织因素作为压力设备运行的风险预测因素的影响下，在给定的影响导致严重后果的事故发生之前，提供前瞻性的信息。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Managers safety attitudes as organizational factors and pressure equipment risk predictor.

BACKGROUND Change in current approach to develop methodologies for process risk assessment, where it is commenced from the process industry and exclusively hazardous materials are dealt with, into the approach where it will be commenced from pressure equipment within any context and both technical and organizational aspects are considered, can lead to the orientation of a more comprehensive approach to risk assessment, and thereby to better results in this area. OBJECTIVE The goal of this study implies the creation of a universal measurement instrument that will measure and quantify organizational factors impact on the risk of pressure equipment exploitation. METHODS The research instrument was drawn from previous research and tested by the multivariate statistical methods using the sample size of 253. RESULTS The confirmatory factor analysis conducted shows that the most influencing organizational factor is 'subcontractors for works from other enterprises' with maximum value of 104, whereas the factors 'maintenance/inspection', 'safety and health at work' and 'human error' are by 10% to 20% less influencing. There then follow 'training and competence of employees for crisis situations', communication', 'potentially hazardous materials and equipment' and 'organizational change management' and the factor 'conducting investigation after accidents' with the lowest value of 29. Pareto analysis indicates that the factors 'communication', 'subcontractors for works from other enterprises', 'organizational changes management', 'potentially hazardous materials and equipment', and 'training and competence of employees for crisis situations' participate with 80%, and they should be given special attention in practice. CONCLUSION The instrument offered can ensure proactive information on the influence of organizational factors as risk predictors of pressure equipment operation, before given influences lead to accidents with severe consequences.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Cognition Technology & Work ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL-

CiteScore

6.90

自引率

7.70%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Cognition, Technology & Work focuses on the practical issues of human interaction with technology within the context of work and, in particular, how human cognition affects, and is affected by, work and working conditions. The aim is to publish research that normally resides on the borderline between people, technology, and organisations. Including how people use information technology, how experience and expertise develop through work, and how incidents and accidents are due to the interaction between individual, technical and organisational factors. The target is thus the study of people at work from a cognitive systems engineering and socio-technical systems perspective. The most relevant working contexts of interest to CTW are those where the impact of modern technologies on people at work is particularly important for the users involved as well as for the effects on the environment and plants. Modern society has come to depend on the safe and efficient functioning of a multitude of technological systems as diverse as industrial production, transportation, communication, supply of energy, information and materials, health and finance.