医疗保健服务中基于经验的协同设计:对项目障碍和推动因素的分析

M. Ramos, S. Bowen, Peter C. Wright, M. G. G. Ferreira, F. Forcellini
{"title":"医疗保健服务中基于经验的协同设计:对项目障碍和推动因素的分析","authors":"M. Ramos, S. Bowen, Peter C. Wright, M. G. G. Ferreira, F. Forcellini","doi":"10.1080/24735132.2020.1837508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Experience Based Co-Design (EBCD) has become a popular way of using experience for healthcare service improvement. Despite its popularity, there are few comparative studies on the use of the approach evaluating its enablers and barriers. Here we analyse the barriers and enablers found in literature and of seven projects that used EBCD in the United Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS) and identify scenarios that may contribute to project success. Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with EBCD project facilitators showed that the main project barriers were human and organizational barriers, and main enablers were the project facilitator role, the use of narratives, full organizational support, pre-intervention actions and the relationship between service and patients. We conclude that EBCD improvement projects are likely to be successful when key enablers are in place and that active management participation in the process facilitates implementing changes.","PeriodicalId":92348,"journal":{"name":"Design for health (Abingdon, England)","volume":"75 1","pages":"276 - 295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experience based co-design in healthcare services: an analysis of projects barriers and enablers\",\"authors\":\"M. Ramos, S. Bowen, Peter C. Wright, M. G. G. Ferreira, F. Forcellini\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24735132.2020.1837508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Experience Based Co-Design (EBCD) has become a popular way of using experience for healthcare service improvement. Despite its popularity, there are few comparative studies on the use of the approach evaluating its enablers and barriers. Here we analyse the barriers and enablers found in literature and of seven projects that used EBCD in the United Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS) and identify scenarios that may contribute to project success. Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with EBCD project facilitators showed that the main project barriers were human and organizational barriers, and main enablers were the project facilitator role, the use of narratives, full organizational support, pre-intervention actions and the relationship between service and patients. We conclude that EBCD improvement projects are likely to be successful when key enablers are in place and that active management participation in the process facilitates implementing changes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Design for health (Abingdon, England)\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"276 - 295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Design for health (Abingdon, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24735132.2020.1837508\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design for health (Abingdon, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24735132.2020.1837508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

基于体验的协同设计(EBCD)已成为利用体验改善医疗服务的一种流行方式。尽管它很受欢迎,但很少有关于使用该方法评估其促成因素和障碍的比较研究。在这里,我们分析了文献中发现的障碍和促成因素,以及在英国国家卫生服务(NHS)中使用EBCD的七个项目,并确定了可能有助于项目成功的场景。对EBCD项目促进者的半结构化访谈的专题分析表明,主要的项目障碍是人和组织障碍,主要的促成因素是项目促进者的角色、叙述的使用、组织的全面支持、干预前行动和服务与患者之间的关系。我们得出的结论是,当关键的推动因素到位时,EBCD改进项目可能会成功,并且在过程中积极的管理参与有助于实施变更。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experience based co-design in healthcare services: an analysis of projects barriers and enablers
Abstract Experience Based Co-Design (EBCD) has become a popular way of using experience for healthcare service improvement. Despite its popularity, there are few comparative studies on the use of the approach evaluating its enablers and barriers. Here we analyse the barriers and enablers found in literature and of seven projects that used EBCD in the United Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS) and identify scenarios that may contribute to project success. Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with EBCD project facilitators showed that the main project barriers were human and organizational barriers, and main enablers were the project facilitator role, the use of narratives, full organizational support, pre-intervention actions and the relationship between service and patients. We conclude that EBCD improvement projects are likely to be successful when key enablers are in place and that active management participation in the process facilitates implementing changes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信