斑块地图集:将设计实践和生态知识整合为复杂系统的城市

IF 0.4 4区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE
C. Hindes, J. Raxworthy
{"title":"斑块地图集:将设计实践和生态知识整合为复杂系统的城市","authors":"C. Hindes, J. Raxworthy","doi":"10.1080/18626033.2021.1948199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern urban planning treats cities as orderly composites of homogenous land uses, however, like a rich quilt, the urban landscape is an amalgam of different social, ecological and material areas or ‘patches’, a term used in urban ecology. Urban designers, landscape architects and architects may be familiar with urban and landscape analysis systems such as McHarg’s ‘layer cake’, the figure-ground, typology and urban morphological studies, however Patch Atlas offers a novel way of representing the social and ecological complexity of the urban realm, which is called ‘heterogeneity’ by landscape ecologists. The particular backgrounds of the authors of Patch Atlas_two urban ecologists and two designers_frame the intention of the book: Victoria Marshall is a landscape architect, founder of Till Design and at the National University of Singapore, Mary Cadenasso is a landscape and urban ecologist at the College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences at UC Davis, Steward Pickett is a plant and urban ecologist at the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies at Arizona State University and Brian McGrath is an urban designer at the Parsons School of Design and founder of Urban-Interface. Correspondingly, the Patch Atlas originates from an inquiry that attempts to conceptualize the totality of the urban system from the perspective of ecology, and urban ecology in particular, providing an opportunity for designers to engage with an ecologically rigorous framing of urban heterogeneity as a system for design. This system is where places that were treated as homogeneous by land use are revealed_to varying degrees, which is the subject of the book_as actually heterogeneous when considered in terms of land cover. The book has three parts: the motivation and description of the system, the application in the form of a case study and a conclusion speculating on the nature of the integration of ecology and design. As a book, Patch Atlas is a handsome slim volume of 128 pages with a graphic nature, with brief chapters explaining their system, and maps, graphs and zoomed patches floating in white space, and a single photograph per chapter typifying each. In essence, Patch Atlas consists of two components. First, the Gwynns Falls watershed in Baltimore is extensively mapped as a set of patches (which are delineations of areas based on relative abundance of specific urban cover elements such as buildings, vegetation and surface materials) combined and represented to reveal patterns in their organization. Then these patterns are analysed and interpreted in the text to address a fundamental question the authors identify about cities as ‘complex hybrid socio-ecological systems’ (p. 2): ‘What are the links between the amount and distribution of various elements of urban form and ecological and social processes?’ (p. 2). The authors propose a new land cover classification tool they call HERCULES, which stands for ‘High Ecological Resolution Classification for Urban Landscapes and Environmental Systems’. They argue that HERCULES can be used ‘as a new conceptual approach appropriate for describing and envisioning change in any complex, urban place’ (p. vii). In addition, they specifically propose that the Patch Atlas extends HERCULES into a system for design, a noble claim that we nonetheless question in this review. Four themes for the book are succinctly articulated in the book’s preface, orientating the reader to the book’s central characteristics that underlie the logic that unfolds: • The atlas is co-produced by urban designers and urban ecologists working together. • It contributes to a long engagement with the relationship of nature and culture that is explicit in the built environment. Particularly, ‘Patch Atlas contrasts starkly with the predominant practice of starting urban classification by separating human-constructed covers from covers that emerge from predominantly biological and geological processes’ (p. viii). • It encourages speculative design. • It can be relevant to disciplines and practices beyond those professed by the authors.","PeriodicalId":43606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Landscape Architecture","volume":"74 1","pages":"90 - 91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patch Atlas: Integrating Design Practices and Ecological Knowledge for Cities as Complex Systems\",\"authors\":\"C. Hindes, J. Raxworthy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/18626033.2021.1948199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Modern urban planning treats cities as orderly composites of homogenous land uses, however, like a rich quilt, the urban landscape is an amalgam of different social, ecological and material areas or ‘patches’, a term used in urban ecology. Urban designers, landscape architects and architects may be familiar with urban and landscape analysis systems such as McHarg’s ‘layer cake’, the figure-ground, typology and urban morphological studies, however Patch Atlas offers a novel way of representing the social and ecological complexity of the urban realm, which is called ‘heterogeneity’ by landscape ecologists. The particular backgrounds of the authors of Patch Atlas_two urban ecologists and two designers_frame the intention of the book: Victoria Marshall is a landscape architect, founder of Till Design and at the National University of Singapore, Mary Cadenasso is a landscape and urban ecologist at the College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences at UC Davis, Steward Pickett is a plant and urban ecologist at the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies at Arizona State University and Brian McGrath is an urban designer at the Parsons School of Design and founder of Urban-Interface. Correspondingly, the Patch Atlas originates from an inquiry that attempts to conceptualize the totality of the urban system from the perspective of ecology, and urban ecology in particular, providing an opportunity for designers to engage with an ecologically rigorous framing of urban heterogeneity as a system for design. This system is where places that were treated as homogeneous by land use are revealed_to varying degrees, which is the subject of the book_as actually heterogeneous when considered in terms of land cover. The book has three parts: the motivation and description of the system, the application in the form of a case study and a conclusion speculating on the nature of the integration of ecology and design. As a book, Patch Atlas is a handsome slim volume of 128 pages with a graphic nature, with brief chapters explaining their system, and maps, graphs and zoomed patches floating in white space, and a single photograph per chapter typifying each. In essence, Patch Atlas consists of two components. First, the Gwynns Falls watershed in Baltimore is extensively mapped as a set of patches (which are delineations of areas based on relative abundance of specific urban cover elements such as buildings, vegetation and surface materials) combined and represented to reveal patterns in their organization. Then these patterns are analysed and interpreted in the text to address a fundamental question the authors identify about cities as ‘complex hybrid socio-ecological systems’ (p. 2): ‘What are the links between the amount and distribution of various elements of urban form and ecological and social processes?’ (p. 2). The authors propose a new land cover classification tool they call HERCULES, which stands for ‘High Ecological Resolution Classification for Urban Landscapes and Environmental Systems’. They argue that HERCULES can be used ‘as a new conceptual approach appropriate for describing and envisioning change in any complex, urban place’ (p. vii). In addition, they specifically propose that the Patch Atlas extends HERCULES into a system for design, a noble claim that we nonetheless question in this review. Four themes for the book are succinctly articulated in the book’s preface, orientating the reader to the book’s central characteristics that underlie the logic that unfolds: • The atlas is co-produced by urban designers and urban ecologists working together. • It contributes to a long engagement with the relationship of nature and culture that is explicit in the built environment. Particularly, ‘Patch Atlas contrasts starkly with the predominant practice of starting urban classification by separating human-constructed covers from covers that emerge from predominantly biological and geological processes’ (p. viii). • It encourages speculative design. • It can be relevant to disciplines and practices beyond those professed by the authors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Landscape Architecture\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"90 - 91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Landscape Architecture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2021.1948199\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Landscape Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2021.1948199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现代城市规划将城市视为同质土地使用的有序组合物,然而,就像一条丰富的被子,城市景观是不同社会、生态和物质区域或“斑块”(城市生态学中的术语)的混合体。城市设计师、景观设计师和建筑师可能熟悉城市和景观分析系统,如McHarg的“分层蛋糕”、图-背景、类型学和城市形态研究,但Patch Atlas提供了一种新颖的方式来表示城市领域的社会和生态复杂性,被景观生态学家称为“异质性”。Patch atlas2位城市生态学家和2位设计师的特殊背景说明了这本书的意图:本文作者维多利亚·马歇尔是景观设计师,蒂尔设计公司创始人,就职于新加坡国立大学;玛丽·卡德纳索是加州大学戴维斯分校农业与环境科学学院的景观与城市生态学家;斯图尔德·皮克特是亚利桑那州立大学卡里生态系统研究所的植物与城市生态学家;布赖恩·麦格拉思是帕森斯设计学院的城市设计师,就职于urban - interface公司。相应地,斑块地图集源于一项调查,该调查试图从生态学的角度概念化城市系统的总体,特别是城市生态学,为设计师提供了一个机会,将城市异质性的生态严格框架作为设计系统。在这一系统中,土地利用方面被视为同质的地方在不同程度上显示出来,这是本书的主题,当考虑到土地覆盖时,实际上是异质的。本书分为三个部分:系统的动机和描述,案例研究形式的应用,以及对生态与设计融合本质的推测结论。作为一本书,《补丁地图集》是一本漂亮的薄薄的卷,有128页,具有图形性质,有简短的章节解释他们的系统,地图,图表和缩放的补丁漂浮在空白区域,每章都有一张照片。本质上,Patch Atlas由两个组件组成。首先,巴尔的摩的格温斯瀑布流域被广泛地绘制为一组斑块(基于特定城市覆盖元素(如建筑物、植被和地表材料)的相对丰富度划定的区域),并将其组合和表示以揭示其组织模式。然后,本文对这些模式进行了分析和解释,以解决作者认为城市是“复杂的混合社会生态系统”的一个基本问题(第2页):“城市形态的各种要素的数量和分布与生态和社会过程之间的联系是什么?”(第2页)。作者提出了一种新的土地覆盖分类工具,他们称之为HERCULES,即“城市景观和环境系统的高生态分辨率分类”。他们认为,HERCULES可以“作为一种新的概念方法,适用于描述和设想任何复杂的城市场所的变化”(第vii页)。此外,他们特别提出,斑块地图集将HERCULES扩展到一个设计系统中,这是一个崇高的主张,但我们在这篇综述中提出了质疑。本书的四个主题在书的序言中简明扼要地阐述,将读者导向本书的核心特征,这些特征构成了展开的逻辑:•地图集是由城市设计师和城市生态学家共同制作的。•它有助于长期参与自然和文化的关系,这在建筑环境中是明确的。特别是,“斑块地图集与将人类建造的覆盖物与主要由生物和地质过程产生的覆盖物分开进行城市分类的主要做法形成鲜明对比”(第viii页)。•它鼓励投机性设计。•它可以与作者所宣称的学科和实践相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patch Atlas: Integrating Design Practices and Ecological Knowledge for Cities as Complex Systems
Modern urban planning treats cities as orderly composites of homogenous land uses, however, like a rich quilt, the urban landscape is an amalgam of different social, ecological and material areas or ‘patches’, a term used in urban ecology. Urban designers, landscape architects and architects may be familiar with urban and landscape analysis systems such as McHarg’s ‘layer cake’, the figure-ground, typology and urban morphological studies, however Patch Atlas offers a novel way of representing the social and ecological complexity of the urban realm, which is called ‘heterogeneity’ by landscape ecologists. The particular backgrounds of the authors of Patch Atlas_two urban ecologists and two designers_frame the intention of the book: Victoria Marshall is a landscape architect, founder of Till Design and at the National University of Singapore, Mary Cadenasso is a landscape and urban ecologist at the College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences at UC Davis, Steward Pickett is a plant and urban ecologist at the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies at Arizona State University and Brian McGrath is an urban designer at the Parsons School of Design and founder of Urban-Interface. Correspondingly, the Patch Atlas originates from an inquiry that attempts to conceptualize the totality of the urban system from the perspective of ecology, and urban ecology in particular, providing an opportunity for designers to engage with an ecologically rigorous framing of urban heterogeneity as a system for design. This system is where places that were treated as homogeneous by land use are revealed_to varying degrees, which is the subject of the book_as actually heterogeneous when considered in terms of land cover. The book has three parts: the motivation and description of the system, the application in the form of a case study and a conclusion speculating on the nature of the integration of ecology and design. As a book, Patch Atlas is a handsome slim volume of 128 pages with a graphic nature, with brief chapters explaining their system, and maps, graphs and zoomed patches floating in white space, and a single photograph per chapter typifying each. In essence, Patch Atlas consists of two components. First, the Gwynns Falls watershed in Baltimore is extensively mapped as a set of patches (which are delineations of areas based on relative abundance of specific urban cover elements such as buildings, vegetation and surface materials) combined and represented to reveal patterns in their organization. Then these patterns are analysed and interpreted in the text to address a fundamental question the authors identify about cities as ‘complex hybrid socio-ecological systems’ (p. 2): ‘What are the links between the amount and distribution of various elements of urban form and ecological and social processes?’ (p. 2). The authors propose a new land cover classification tool they call HERCULES, which stands for ‘High Ecological Resolution Classification for Urban Landscapes and Environmental Systems’. They argue that HERCULES can be used ‘as a new conceptual approach appropriate for describing and envisioning change in any complex, urban place’ (p. vii). In addition, they specifically propose that the Patch Atlas extends HERCULES into a system for design, a noble claim that we nonetheless question in this review. Four themes for the book are succinctly articulated in the book’s preface, orientating the reader to the book’s central characteristics that underlie the logic that unfolds: • The atlas is co-produced by urban designers and urban ecologists working together. • It contributes to a long engagement with the relationship of nature and culture that is explicit in the built environment. Particularly, ‘Patch Atlas contrasts starkly with the predominant practice of starting urban classification by separating human-constructed covers from covers that emerge from predominantly biological and geological processes’ (p. viii). • It encourages speculative design. • It can be relevant to disciplines and practices beyond those professed by the authors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: JoLA is the academic Journal of the European Council of Landscape Architecture Schools (ECLAS), established in 2006. It is published three times a year. JoLA aims to support, stimulate, and extend scholarly debate in Landscape Architecture and related fields. It also gives space to the reflective practitioner and to design research. The journal welcomes articles addressing any aspect of Landscape Architecture, to cultivate the diverse identity of the discipline. JoLA is internationally oriented and seeks to both draw in and contribute to global perspectives through its four key sections: the ‘Articles’ section features both academic scholarship and research related to professional practice; the ‘Under the Sky’ section fosters research based on critical analysis and interpretation of built projects; the ‘Thinking Eye’ section presents research based on thoughtful experimentation in visual methodologies and media; the ‘Review’ section presents critical reflection on recent literature, conferences and/or exhibitions relevant to Landscape Architecture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信