腰椎皮质下螺钉放置的个性化导航模板

R. A. Kovalenko, V. A. Kashin, V. Cherebillo
{"title":"腰椎皮质下螺钉放置的个性化导航模板","authors":"R. A. Kovalenko, V. A. Kashin, V. Cherebillo","doi":"10.17691/stm2021.13.5.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Subcortical screw placement is currently performed using frontal view fluoroscopy or intraoperative O-arm navigation system. The emergence of a novel technique for spinal navigation based on individual navigation templates created using 3D printing technology determines the need to study their safety and effectiveness in subcortical implantation. The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of subcortical implantation of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine using individual navigation templates versus intraoperative fluoroscopy. Materials and Methods The study was based on the analysis of treatment results in 39 patients who underwent surgery with subcortical implantation of 130 screws using the MidLIF technique. In group 1, navigation templates were used, in group 2 — intraoperative fluoroscopic control. Comparative analysis of implantation correctness and time, the total operation time, and radiation load was performed. Results The mean distance between the screw and the cortical plate recorded in the groups ranged within 1.20–3.97 mm, without statistically significant difference (p>0.05). The mean time of pedicle screw implantation was 137.0 [115.25; 161.50] s in group 1 and 314.0 [183.50; 403.25] s in group 2. The total operation time was reduced from 173.0 [155.0; 192.25] min in group 2 to 119.0 [108.0; 128.75] min in group 1. The average of 1.0 [1.0; 2.0] X-ray image was performed to place one screw in group 1, while it was 12.0 [10.0; 13.25] in group 2. The differences between the groups in terms of implantation time and radiation load were statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion Compared with intraoperative fluoroscopy, the use of individual navigation templates for subcortical implantation of pedicle screws provides their correct positioning with a significant reduction in both operation time and radiation load at similar safety.","PeriodicalId":18710,"journal":{"name":"Modern Technologies in Medicine","volume":"72 1","pages":"41 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual Navigation Templates for Subcortical Screw Placement in Lumbar Spine\",\"authors\":\"R. A. Kovalenko, V. A. Kashin, V. Cherebillo\",\"doi\":\"10.17691/stm2021.13.5.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Subcortical screw placement is currently performed using frontal view fluoroscopy or intraoperative O-arm navigation system. The emergence of a novel technique for spinal navigation based on individual navigation templates created using 3D printing technology determines the need to study their safety and effectiveness in subcortical implantation. The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of subcortical implantation of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine using individual navigation templates versus intraoperative fluoroscopy. Materials and Methods The study was based on the analysis of treatment results in 39 patients who underwent surgery with subcortical implantation of 130 screws using the MidLIF technique. In group 1, navigation templates were used, in group 2 — intraoperative fluoroscopic control. Comparative analysis of implantation correctness and time, the total operation time, and radiation load was performed. Results The mean distance between the screw and the cortical plate recorded in the groups ranged within 1.20–3.97 mm, without statistically significant difference (p>0.05). The mean time of pedicle screw implantation was 137.0 [115.25; 161.50] s in group 1 and 314.0 [183.50; 403.25] s in group 2. The total operation time was reduced from 173.0 [155.0; 192.25] min in group 2 to 119.0 [108.0; 128.75] min in group 1. The average of 1.0 [1.0; 2.0] X-ray image was performed to place one screw in group 1, while it was 12.0 [10.0; 13.25] in group 2. The differences between the groups in terms of implantation time and radiation load were statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion Compared with intraoperative fluoroscopy, the use of individual navigation templates for subcortical implantation of pedicle screws provides their correct positioning with a significant reduction in both operation time and radiation load at similar safety.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modern Technologies in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"41 - 46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modern Technologies in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2021.13.5.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Technologies in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2021.13.5.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

皮质下螺钉置入目前使用正面透视或术中o型臂导航系统。基于使用3D打印技术创建的单个导航模板的脊柱导航新技术的出现决定了研究其在皮质下植入中的安全性和有效性的必要性。本研究的目的是评估和比较皮质下腰椎椎弓根螺钉植入使用单个导航模板与术中透视的效果。材料与方法本研究基于39例采用MidLIF技术皮质下植入130枚螺钉的患者的治疗结果分析。组1采用导航模板,组2采用术中透视控制。对比分析了植入的正确性、时间、总手术时间和辐射负荷。结果各组螺钉与皮质板的平均距离在1.20 ~ 3.97 mm之间,差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。椎弓根螺钉植入平均时间为137.0 [115.25];[161.50] 1组和314.0组[183.50;[40.25]在第二组。总手术时间由173.0缩短至155.0;[192.25]组2 ~ 119.0 [108.0]min;12.75] 1组min。平均值为1.0 [1.0;组1 x线影像,放置1颗螺钉,组1为12.0 [10.0;13.25]在第二组。组间种植时间、辐射负荷差异均有统计学意义(p<0.05)。结论与术中透视检查相比,皮质下椎弓根螺钉植入使用单独的导航模板定位正确,可显著减少手术时间和辐射负荷,安全性相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Individual Navigation Templates for Subcortical Screw Placement in Lumbar Spine
Subcortical screw placement is currently performed using frontal view fluoroscopy or intraoperative O-arm navigation system. The emergence of a novel technique for spinal navigation based on individual navigation templates created using 3D printing technology determines the need to study their safety and effectiveness in subcortical implantation. The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of subcortical implantation of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine using individual navigation templates versus intraoperative fluoroscopy. Materials and Methods The study was based on the analysis of treatment results in 39 patients who underwent surgery with subcortical implantation of 130 screws using the MidLIF technique. In group 1, navigation templates were used, in group 2 — intraoperative fluoroscopic control. Comparative analysis of implantation correctness and time, the total operation time, and radiation load was performed. Results The mean distance between the screw and the cortical plate recorded in the groups ranged within 1.20–3.97 mm, without statistically significant difference (p>0.05). The mean time of pedicle screw implantation was 137.0 [115.25; 161.50] s in group 1 and 314.0 [183.50; 403.25] s in group 2. The total operation time was reduced from 173.0 [155.0; 192.25] min in group 2 to 119.0 [108.0; 128.75] min in group 1. The average of 1.0 [1.0; 2.0] X-ray image was performed to place one screw in group 1, while it was 12.0 [10.0; 13.25] in group 2. The differences between the groups in terms of implantation time and radiation load were statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion Compared with intraoperative fluoroscopy, the use of individual navigation templates for subcortical implantation of pedicle screws provides their correct positioning with a significant reduction in both operation time and radiation load at similar safety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信