新冠肺炎重症监护病房患者无需插管而好转的病例系列

A. Seo, P. Radhakrishnan, T. Flanigan, G. Carino
{"title":"新冠肺炎重症监护病房患者无需插管而好转的病例系列","authors":"A. Seo, P. Radhakrishnan, T. Flanigan, G. Carino","doi":"10.36648/1989-5216.12.4.317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The SARS-CoV-2 virus, more commonly known as coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), is a novel respiratory virus that was first recognized in China and has now spread across the world. The outbreak of the “ Coronavirus Disease 2019” (COVID-19) started in December 2019 and quickly became a sweeping and unprecedented challenge to different stakeholders in mainland China. Although the epidemic of COVID-19 is not yet over, it has already outpaced the previous severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003 and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) in 2012. Approximately 3.2% of patients with COVID-19 required intubation and invasive ventilation at some point in the disease course. Providing best practices regarding intubation and ventilation for an overwhelming number of patients with COVID-19 amid an enhanced risk of cross-infection is a daunting undertaking. By putting patients on ventilators comes with risks, too, including infection and unintentional damage to the lungs. Very often, patients require heavy sedatives to paralyze them so doctors can get the breathing tube into the patients' windpipe. That procedure, called intubation, also carries the risk of infection and lung complications, and can expose health care workers to virus-filled respiratory droplets. This is a case series that explains the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients who have required high amounts of supplemental oxygen, but were able to improve without intubation.","PeriodicalId":92003,"journal":{"name":"Archives of medicine","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Case Series of COVID-19 ICU Patients who Improved without Requiring Intubation\",\"authors\":\"A. Seo, P. Radhakrishnan, T. Flanigan, G. Carino\",\"doi\":\"10.36648/1989-5216.12.4.317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The SARS-CoV-2 virus, more commonly known as coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), is a novel respiratory virus that was first recognized in China and has now spread across the world. The outbreak of the “ Coronavirus Disease 2019” (COVID-19) started in December 2019 and quickly became a sweeping and unprecedented challenge to different stakeholders in mainland China. Although the epidemic of COVID-19 is not yet over, it has already outpaced the previous severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003 and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) in 2012. Approximately 3.2% of patients with COVID-19 required intubation and invasive ventilation at some point in the disease course. Providing best practices regarding intubation and ventilation for an overwhelming number of patients with COVID-19 amid an enhanced risk of cross-infection is a daunting undertaking. By putting patients on ventilators comes with risks, too, including infection and unintentional damage to the lungs. Very often, patients require heavy sedatives to paralyze them so doctors can get the breathing tube into the patients' windpipe. That procedure, called intubation, also carries the risk of infection and lung complications, and can expose health care workers to virus-filled respiratory droplets. This is a case series that explains the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients who have required high amounts of supplemental oxygen, but were able to improve without intubation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of medicine\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36648/1989-5216.12.4.317\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36648/1989-5216.12.4.317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

SARS-CoV-2病毒,通常被称为冠状病毒2019 (COVID-19),是一种新型呼吸道病毒,最初在中国被发现,现在已经蔓延到世界各地。2019年12月爆发的“2019冠状病毒病”(COVID-19)迅速成为中国大陆不同利益相关者面临的全面和前所未有的挑战。虽然COVID-19的流行尚未结束,但它已经超过了2003年的严重急性呼吸系统综合征(SARS)和2012年的中东呼吸综合征(MERS)。大约3.2%的COVID-19患者在病程的某个阶段需要插管和有创通气。在交叉感染风险增加的情况下,为大量COVID-19患者提供插管和通气的最佳做法是一项艰巨的任务。给病人戴上呼吸机也有风险,包括感染和对肺部的意外损伤。通常情况下,病人需要大量的镇静剂来麻痹他们,这样医生才能将呼吸管插入病人的气管。这种被称为插管的手术也有感染和肺部并发症的风险,并可能使医护人员接触到充满病毒的呼吸道飞沫。这是一个病例系列,解释了需要大量补充氧气但无需插管即可改善的COVID-19患者的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Case Series of COVID-19 ICU Patients who Improved without Requiring Intubation
The SARS-CoV-2 virus, more commonly known as coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), is a novel respiratory virus that was first recognized in China and has now spread across the world. The outbreak of the “ Coronavirus Disease 2019” (COVID-19) started in December 2019 and quickly became a sweeping and unprecedented challenge to different stakeholders in mainland China. Although the epidemic of COVID-19 is not yet over, it has already outpaced the previous severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003 and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) in 2012. Approximately 3.2% of patients with COVID-19 required intubation and invasive ventilation at some point in the disease course. Providing best practices regarding intubation and ventilation for an overwhelming number of patients with COVID-19 amid an enhanced risk of cross-infection is a daunting undertaking. By putting patients on ventilators comes with risks, too, including infection and unintentional damage to the lungs. Very often, patients require heavy sedatives to paralyze them so doctors can get the breathing tube into the patients' windpipe. That procedure, called intubation, also carries the risk of infection and lung complications, and can expose health care workers to virus-filled respiratory droplets. This is a case series that explains the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients who have required high amounts of supplemental oxygen, but were able to improve without intubation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信